[Tungsten]

Originally posted by Velocd
Screenshots, demo's, anything to show us why this hack is different than so many of the other security hacks?

Not to seem antagonistic here, but why should the burden of proof fall squarely on the shoulders of MT_100 ? I see this sort of post here all the time -- someone makes a hack and releases it and invariably someone else comes along and "challenges the legitimacy" of that hack.

Variety is the spice of life. Maybe MT_100's code is just cleaner than the rest ... maybe his/hers is the one that works best with Microsoft web servers ... maybe it was created without harming any laboratory animals. Who knows!