Quote:
Originally Posted by ozzy47
|
Specifically, I'm referring to how the 3.x series continued for a short time after 4.0 was released. I don't recall anyone foreseeing that eventuality in order to announce it. I didn't see this particular announcement, but I went ahead and assumed it was the case just based on precedent. I didn't even realize it was under question that 3.x users with an active license might not get in on the 4.x series. I had just assumed it would happen the way it happened, sans the simultaneous development.
I do get the distinct feeling that people think I'm complaining about something I'm not.