[KW802]

Originally Posted by katie hunter

That is not logically right as we know the amount of work and features put into Vbulletin isn't equal to the amount of work and features XF is currently dealing with. Not even the number of developers Vbulletin has is equal to the number of developers XF has (which are two dev, Mike & Kier)

If i logged in to my Vbulletin 4.x , i find this list

Engineering Alan Orduno, Brett Morriss, Danco Dimovski, David Grove, Edwin Brown, Fernando Varesi, Freddie Bingham, Glenn Vergara, Jay Quiambao, Jorge Tiznado, Kevin Sours, Kyle Furlong, Michael Lavaveshkul, Olga Mandrosov, Paul Marsden, Xiaoyu Huang, Zoltan Szalay

Why are we running in this bad circle? You want to tell me that XF is better VB 4.x?

Wait, we're talking about vB4 now? Wasn't your argument that vB5 is going to improve in the next two years and everybody was going to come back to it? Now you are back on vB4, which does not have Sphinx compatibility so I guess that it really is an "inferior" as well.

But, either way, are you trying to say that vBulletin has less or more "work and features" than what "XF is currently dealing with"? And what does the number of people with credits in the the vB ACP have to do with anything? More hands in a product development does not mean by default it is a better product than others.

Just to sum this up.... people should pay more for vB5 because there is a chance it'll be improved in the next two years and, in the interim, they should use the older vB4 version with its inferior search since, after all, they have more people assigned to the project?