[Max Taxable]

Originally Posted by final kaoss

Nope, it doesn't appear to be from AME. Just checked it's 6 files & 7 folders.

Yep i just renamed it "youtube_old" and it had no effect, and uploaded the new one. Installing the call for it now.



UPDATE: This had no effect at all, apparently AME overrides the call.

ANOTHER UPDATE: "Hey dummy, change the "site.com" in the call, to your actual domain where the js file is located!"

Seems to have made it faster in threads with a bunch of videos, otherwise no change. All embeds are still there and everything still works right, can't see any harm done.

I have the call installed on the footer of only one style, so i will test that and a style without, on webpagetest and see if there's a change in the kb loaded.

--------------- Added [DATE]1383711077[/DATE] at [TIME]1383711077[/TIME] ---------------

FINAL UPDATE...

NO difference at all on kb loaded or pageload speed with and without this addition, while using AME.

--------------- Added [DATE]1383716246[/DATE] at [TIME]1383716246[/TIME] ---------------

Here's two identical tests at webpagetest dot org, with same browser, same location, same connection and only minutes apart. The first one is with this addition:




The second one, without:





I am using AME, and all this did was add six requests... and three bytes.