[Paul M]

Originally Posted by cheat-master30

1. Because otherwise you have a load of unused tables taking up space, especially for things that get replaced by better features.
2. Because pretty much everything can be done with default features... prefixes... tags... And because save your panicking about not upgrading, just drop the smaller modifications that I hear have been made all round this site..
3. True.
4. Darn it... redundancy.
5. It'd be nice though. And they promise they'll overhaul this, or at least did once in the past.
6. Because it looks more like the standard style and makes more sense than an edited postbit template.
7. Not sure. Maybe it'll help the staff, I don't know. Best to set an example, otherwise no one use the suite features on their own forums either.
8. Awesome.
9. Good idea though, it's been requested dozens of times now.
10. It's merely a saying. Basically... follow this and you get success.

1. We dont have loads of unused tables, nor would we. Im pretty sure space is not an issue with IB either
2. Prefixes yes, tagging .. maybe. Neither of those would replace some of the basic features like install tracking.
3. -
4. -
5. I cant comment on what plans IB have (cause they dont tell me ....).
6. The same layout for mods, articles etc does not make sense, each has their own requirement.
7. This seems to be a common misconception, vb.org is a place to get/discuss modifications, its purpose is not a vb showcase.
8. I guess it depends on what happens to PT, and peoples time.
9. See 5
10. Not a saying ive come across.