[VFTB]

Originally Posted by Wayne Luke

If he was working at Wal-mart than 95% of his salary should go to advocacy against animal cruelty. That should be his only purpose in life right now and should have been part of his original sentence. And yes, if Wal-mart hired him and used it for publicity than I wouldn't shop there anymore or anywhere else for that matter. He can actually make a decent living in advocacy work and it would improve his image. I am not saying his entire life but for 5 years.

If he was simply caught at a dog fight, than he more than served his time. However he funded them and killed animals violently because "they didn't perform to expectations". I bet he doesn't have to worry about being electrocuted or drowned if he doesn't perform up to expectations.

95%?! I'm sorry but if 95% of a Wal-Mart salary went to someone else, the guy wouldn't even have the money to get to work. The fact is, the legal system has run it's course. If you disagree, then fault the system, not the man. Vick isn't the only person to have done this, and even got stiffer sentences than the other guys that were involved with him. Trust me you don't want to sound like some of the outrageous PETA people that lose all credibility for the rest of the group trying to do some good, and by claiming that one man should suffer MORE just because of publicity is absurd and makes it sound like one of the aforementioned people. As far as it being used for publicity, trust me, the Eagles were trying to get better by signing the guy. You don't give a guy a 2 year contract just for negative publicity and attention.