Quote:
Originally Posted by KTBleeding
I don't know, maybe it's just me, but I don't think it's very fair to argue this article with something that very very few have actually laid their eyes, let alone their hands on. And perhaps you weren't necessarily arguing the article, more so comments to the article.. I still feel it's a little irrelevant.
|
I don't see how making the software easier to use and update in future versions is irrelevant to the discussion at hand. The comments were it was too difficult to upgrade and the style was archaic. Both of which are being changed in the upcoming version. Asking us to go back and retrofit these changes in previous versions or assuming that each version exists in a vacuum and the software isn't malleable is what should be considered irrelevant.