[Marco van Herwaarden]

We (both staff and members) already spend a lot of time educating users (including coders), and that is what we can do.

There are too many modifications released or updated each month to inspect them all. Also staff is here to moderate the site, not to inspect modifications. But if a (larger) group members with coding experience would commit for a longer time to taking part in a Quality Assurance team, then we might consider giving it a go again, but i doubt it will work as history has proven that either not enough members want to spend their time on inspecting other peoples work and or interest faded after some time and the whole project collapses.

It will also not be easy to have objective guidelines on when to accept a submission and when not.

PS Yes i have my personal list of "good" modifications. But my criterium (being a coder myself) is simply: If i didn't write it myself, i don't trust it. So hardly worthwhile to post such a list.

PS There is an older thread on the same topic: https://vborg.vbsupport.ru/showthrea...hlight=quality