Quote:
Originally Posted by h2ojunkie
Regex is one thing I've never come close to comprehending, so I may be talking out my wazoo here.
But I thought the photobucket video embed code they provide for forums always has the action=view parameter.
[url=http://s266.photobucket.com/albums/ii245/mixedtape1394/?action=view¤t=100_0102.flv][IMG]http://i266.photobucket.com/albums/ii245/mixedtape1394/th_100_0102.jpg[/IMG][/url]
When comparing it to the HTML link they provide to render the video player, I wouldn't think there wouldn't be conflicts when the users post the embed code as long as the replacement only happened if the action=view was present in the code
HTML Code:
<a href="http://media.photobucket.com/video/test/mixedtape1394/100_0102.flv?o=3" target="_blank"><embed width="448" height="361" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" src="http://i266.photobucket.com/player.swf?file=http://vid266.photobucket.com/albums/ii245/mixedtape1394/100_0102.flv&sr=1"></a>
But like I already said, regex mind as well be talking Greek to me, so any chance of me figuring out how to write a replacement to test the theory is out the window.
|
The conflict I was referring to, (if there is a conflict, admitedly, I haven't had a chance to test this yet) would come, not from the video, but from the image embed code. You had asked if we could use this to embed images. The problem I see is people grabbing the image forum code with the [img]https://vborg.vbsupport.ru/[/img] tags and either getting an image with the IMG tags on either side, or no picture at all. Like I said, though, I will have to test this to be sure.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonkYZ
Still no fullscreen definition update for YouTube ? We really miss that...
|
You know, I kind of forgot. They changed the fullscreen code, didn't they? I'll have to do some research on this to get in the next definition update I do.
Quote:
Originally Posted by xoclanes
this work with the new widescreen youtube and the option for high dif in youtube?
|
I was only recently turned me on to this, so it will be part of the next definition update, but you'll have to get that from one of my Add-On threads.