[Gio~Logist]

Originally Posted by Danny.VBT

Okay before this topic goes out of control....

User suggestions have two components:

1.) They identify a problem.

2.) They offer a solution to the problem.

A perfect suggestion would identify a problem and offer the best solution to address the issue. When a suggestion doesn't do this, however, it's the staff's job to evaluate the problem and come up with the optimal solution.

Mostly all the suggestions here always identify a valid problem within the community, however, a lot of the bigger issues need to be fleshed out more in order to find the correct solution. The worst scenario I can imagine is implementing something that does not fix the problem it was meant too. ($700 Billion bail out anyone??)

That's why we are "not ready" to announce our plans, things still need to be finalize. If you don't like that answer, than I'm sorry...but it's the plan truth. We are not going to rush anything, that leads to bad decisions.

Hopefully this answers both Gio and Shelley.

----------------------------
--- Your Version --
User suggestions have two components:

1.) They identify a problem.

2.) They offer a solution to the problem.

--- Our Version --
User suggestions have three components:

1.) They identify a problem.

2.) They offer a solution to the problem.

3.) They deal with the problem (and some have to work around it) for years

----------------------------

Originally Posted by Dannt.VBT

That's why we are "not ready" to announce our plans, things still need to be finalize. If you don't like that answer, than I'm sorry...but it's the plan truth. We are not going to rush anything, that leads to bad decisions.

I don't know how plan truth your plan is, but i have no doubt that it's plain. And at what point of your solution does the response time pass the "rushed" state and enter the "reasonable" state? "Our version" is that we've been well passed the rushed state. And at what point in your plan does the truth stop being "plain" and start being a reality?

Anyways, it's starting to get pointless arguing with you guys, seriously. Not to be blunt about the situation but like i said before, I don't blame you guys... I blame the structure. Maybe we're expecting too much from a group of volunteers as oppose to a group of professionals. As a vb.org coordinator, does Marco have anything else valid to say about this or are the admins the only ones giving the information here?