[Edward S]

Originally Posted by legionofangels

Seems like a cheap way to outdo someone that has a bad day at the game.

While that is the Boxing type system of defending your title, anyone could simply just not play the game anymore and avoid risking losing there high score.

Even if you allowed challenges, in Boxing its about who wins, not how you played the game, so even if it was a close match with a lower high score if the champ still wins he still wins. So really, what's the point?



Why wouldn't you go by User Ratings and have a function that orders the games in a list of highest rated. Therefore each community will determine what are the best games based upon the rating they give them.

Cheese and Rice!..
Y'know, this message 'asked' for suggestions.. I gave a few.. and then someone 'ARGUES' down the suggestion?

Maybe, that's why there's no suggestions..

Hey Legions!.. imagine this... Yeah, someone could just 'not play' - someone comes up behind them and plays with a HIGHER score.. they take the lead.. duh!..

Keeps those 'players' (for lack of a better word) from just sitting on a high score.. And who cares if someone has a 'bad day' in the games? Losing their seat in the game serves them right for Playing when they have a bad day. Like the top score 'belongs' to them or something..

Again though, if you're going to ASK for suggestions.. Lets not ARGUE them down..

It was a viable suggestion.. I've seen it in play elsewhere.. and if you really want to get technical.. "If someone risks playing the game after having a high score" and does worse.. So what?!!..

IT's A GAME!.. Just a GAME!.. yeesh!