[thincom2000]

Originally Posted by mrghostno1

shouldn't the second image be shown under the other? Since it's over width.
In may case i have small thumbs. I'm confuse

Okay, I think I am done with the updates to the mod and should be uploading it relatively soon. What will happen now is that all images remain on the same line if they were entered on the same line (that is, original line breaks are maintained).

This would be a bad thing if multiple images in a line were oversized, because even after resize, leaving them together would probably still be too big. This was the original reason for forcing the images to separate lines.

Now, however, the mod will treat ALL images on a line together as a single image, and resize them accordingly. Basically this means they will all have to share the maximum width, and each will be smaller than if they were the only image. I think this is the best solution without getting invasive on post layout again.

The code structure has changed. In order to accomplish the "width sharing" all widths have to be calculated first (otherwise the ones resized first would mess up the calculations). Once that is complete the images are finally resized. A new plugin had to be added to avoid the onload() bug. This is the bug (or feature?) where Javascript will only run 1 onload command in an entire page. This was partially your issue if sometimes the images weren't clickable. Although the real thing to blame is the session hash vBulletin hides in every URL. Somehow this prevents Javascript functions from running more than once. It must be the session hash because clicking a vBulletin link doesn't work as expected, yet directly typing the URL does work (and this is the only difference I can tell between the URLs). Anyone (staff?) care to comment?

All resize commands have been moved to the $onload variable in the body tag. In addition, a second new plugin had to be added to insert a regex to prevent each image from breaking the intended layout and eventually style (this is the line break fix).

To address the [url][img]https://vborg.vbsupport.ru/[/img][/url] reported bug, where the link opens the image and not the address in the url bb-code: this is actually not a bug, but intended functionality. For now, if you want to link resized images elsewhere, use captions. Or right click and open the link that way. I will add a feature so that the link to the original image moves to the disclaimer if wrapped in a URL tag. If the disclaimer is disabled and this is the case, the link to the original image will disappear.