[kall]

Originally Posted by Paul M

I would love a system where you click on the vb version field and it displays a page of all the vb versions for a mod - and the status for each version (i.e. Does not Work, Assumed to Work, Tested as Working). When a new (higher) vb version comes out, it would be marked as "Assumed to Work" until the author edits the properties and marks it as "Tested as Working" (or "Does not Work").

I'll second that one.

Anthony's initial idea is, IMO, a mighty fine one. This expansion of it is even finer.

It could even be as simple as a 'Multiple-Selection Dropdown Menu' containing all possible versions of vB for the Forum (3.0.x, 3.5.x, 3.6.x) that the thread is being posted in.

As Anthony says, what possible reason could someone logically have to select a version that hasn't been released yet? It's not like people would believe it, and it would mark that person as either a loon or a liar... how could they have tested it on a version that isn't available?

Going by the logic presented by Marco against the idea, theres no need for ANY of the selection boxes we currently have, as the author could just edit the hack description and add "Supported", "is in Beta stage" etc.