vb.org Archive

vb.org Archive (https://vborg.vbsupport.ru/index.php)
-   Community Lounge (https://vborg.vbsupport.ru/forumdisplay.php?f=13)
-   -   Good host with large bandwidth? (2 Terabytes+) (https://vborg.vbsupport.ru/showthread.php?t=71316)

Gutspiller 11-03-2004 03:48 PM

Good host with large bandwidth? (2 Terabytes+)
 
Right now I'm looking at theplanet.com's P2800 plan. I was wondering if anybody has something that beats it for a better price, but is still a decent hosting company?

$200 a month
Dual 2.8GHz Xeon Processors
1GB RAM
2 x 80GB HDD
IP Addresses 11
Bandwidth 2000GB

Anybody know of something better for the same or lower price? I would be interested in hearing from you.

Thanks!

Zachery 11-03-2004 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gutspiller
Right now I'm looking at theplanet.com's P2800 plan. I was wondering if anybody has something that beats it for a better price, but is still a decent hosting company?

$200 a month
Dual 2.8GHz Xeon Processors
1GB RAM
2 x 80GB HDD
IP Addresses 11
Bandwidth 2000GB

Anybody know of something better for the same or lower price? I would be interested in hearing from you.

Thanks!

If you have massive bandwidth concenrs i would recomend getting the SCSI system as I am guessing you are using alot of your diskspace for static downloads. :)

Gutspiller 11-03-2004 06:07 PM

Is there a big performance differnence between IDE, SATA and SCSI as far as downloads and serving pages are concerned? I thought that the bottleneck would be more of what type of connection the server is connected to the Internet backbone?

Erwin 11-05-2004 10:41 PM

SCSI is fastest. Some newer SATA drives come close, but SCSI has it's own processor and will tend to reduce CPU stress as well.

For static content, IDE drives would do really. IO congestion usually happens with database servers as database queries require fast read access. This is where SCSI, and especially SCSI RAID0 shines.

SaN-DeeP 11-06-2004 08:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gutspiller
Is there a big performance differnence between IDE, SATA and SCSI as far as downloads and serving pages are concerned? I thought that the bottleneck would be more of what type of connection the server is connected to the Internet backbone?

YEAH scsi gives you best performace :) it wont reduce the cpu stress anyway but performace wise output it very well handled


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:02 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by vBS
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

X vBulletin 3.8.12 by vBS Debug Information
  • Page Generation 0.01086 seconds
  • Memory Usage 1,717KB
  • Queries Executed 10 (?)
More Information
Template Usage:
  • (1)ad_footer_end
  • (1)ad_footer_start
  • (1)ad_header_end
  • (1)ad_header_logo
  • (1)ad_navbar_below
  • (2)bbcode_quote_printable
  • (1)footer
  • (1)gobutton
  • (1)header
  • (1)headinclude
  • (6)option
  • (1)post_thanks_navbar_search
  • (1)printthread
  • (5)printthreadbit
  • (1)spacer_close
  • (1)spacer_open 

Phrase Groups Available:
  • global
  • postbit
  • showthread
Included Files:
  • ./printthread.php
  • ./global.php
  • ./includes/init.php
  • ./includes/class_core.php
  • ./includes/config.php
  • ./includes/functions.php
  • ./includes/class_hook.php
  • ./includes/modsystem_functions.php
  • ./includes/class_bbcode_alt.php
  • ./includes/class_bbcode.php
  • ./includes/functions_bigthree.php 

Hooks Called:
  • init_startup
  • init_startup_session_setup_start
  • init_startup_session_setup_complete
  • cache_permissions
  • fetch_threadinfo_query
  • fetch_threadinfo
  • fetch_foruminfo
  • style_fetch
  • cache_templates
  • global_start
  • parse_templates
  • global_setup_complete
  • printthread_start
  • bbcode_fetch_tags
  • bbcode_create
  • bbcode_parse_start
  • bbcode_parse_complete_precache
  • bbcode_parse_complete
  • printthread_post
  • printthread_complete