Advanced Memberlist Search
 

Advanced Memberlist Searching

Description
This Hack adds the criteria "Profile Picture" (Only Users with/Only users without/Don't care) and "Age" (From/To) for memberlist searching.
Of course it does take care of birthday privacy settings: Only users who do allow their age to be displayed will be found if you search for age.

Details
1 Product XML (2 Plugins, 3 Phrases)

Important
This Hack requires at least vBulletin 3.5.2

This Hack is unsupported! All support requests except proven bugs will be ignored

Thanks.. good feature to have

Seems good, I reckon my members would like to be able to only search fro profiles with a picture. Brings us one step closer to a myspace style profiled site. ;)

Nice one Kirby/Andreas, why change to your real name anyway?

Jelsoft staff policy :)

good hack

Yeah great little addition. Must admit 3.5.2 is news to me though... Back to the upgrade!

Nice to see that some people realise a forum is not only about threads and forums but members and community also! :)

*INSTALLED*



[EDIT] Can you please check this: It seems, the search for members with profilepicture is not working. Searching for members without picture is working correct. (I have installed your profile-pic-icon-hack) [/EDIT]


[EDIT2] uninstalled [/EDIT2]

I've been looking for something like this for ages.

One question though ... what is in it that makes 3.5.2 important?

I've just tested it on 3.5.0 and have found that it doesn't work ... But due to serious lack of time I would rather not upgrade just yet

Search for Members with/without Profile Picture doesn't work correctly. No I don't have "profile picture icon hack", which is mentioned on the plugin. Age works fine though, but I guess I won't click on Install until the code is fixed :)

p.s. in my site, when clicking on members with profile picture enabled, it returns all of them, but in addition some others, who don't have a profile picture. Amongs 55.000 members, it returns about 292, while the correct number should be ~212 (based on the related entries on the table).

I told Anreas already exactly the same, but he says, the hack works for him fine (which I really doubt), and the hack is not supported, so he is not willed to look at this.

There is definitely a bug in the hack, because after changing some statements in the code it works correct.


Jörg