New VBSEO thread *Child Proof*
 

My response to joey in that thread. (I promise, I wont be the one getting this thread closed by saying one word)

just wondering if i can get input on this..
btw i think i asked good in the last thread :rolleyes:
anyways this is what i had psoted b4 it was closed

Apologies accepted.

Yes - actually it was a private message. Therefore, (since my comment needs to be considered in context) I would prefer that you post the entire PM here.

I don't know and I really don't care (not being smart, I just do not have any use for that feautre, nor do I see any use for anyone using other than to duplicate content which google frowns upon) so the product does exactly what I want.

If it doesn't work then I guess it doesn't work. I can't see many people buying VBSEO to remove duplicate content only to turn around and duplicate their content via parked domains.

I think many misunderstand what consitiutes duplicate content and the (assumed) penalty from google.

Oh really?

Well then please explain Google's penalty for duplicate content, especially when you have two different domain names that have the exact same content.

Please explain why Google would find this acceptable.

I didnt say that - I only said I think many misunderstand what consitiutes duplicate content and the (assumed) penalty from google.

Clarification: there is a real duplicate content penalty for content that is duplicated with minor or no variation across the pages of a single site. There is also a "mirror" penalty for a site that is more or less substantially duplicating another single site. What I'm talking about here is the reprint of pages of content individually, rather than in a mass, on multiple sites.

• PageRank. Many thousands of high-PageRank sites reprint content and provide content for reprint. The most obvious case is the news wires such as Reuters (PR 8) and the Associated Press (PR 9) that reprint to sites such as www.nytimes.com (PR 10).
• The proliferation of content reprint sites. There are now hundreds of websites devoted to reprint content because it's a cheap, easy magnet for web traffic, especially search engine traffic.
• Experience. I've seen significant search engine traffic both from distributing content to be reprinted and from reprinting content on the site.

Just a tidbit from HERE

Aaaand... the 'PM that contradicts the notice on the site' doesn't do anything of the sort.

Juan, in the PM, states "I have to say I agree with you %100 in the fact that mod_rewrite is not necessary to get pages indexed.".

The site states: .
Where is the contradiction? Nowhere in the list does it say that "vBSEO is necessary if you want your pages indexed". Nor does it even state that mod_rewrite is.

That's all good but we are talking about parked domains here with the same content as another domain.

thank you for trying to answer this.

i don't really have any need for parking more url's but this was a concern that i had with the vbseo script, because of my understanding ( and I could be wrong ) you must tell vbseo your site that the script is running on, and unless they " activate it " it wont work.
this is why I asked, because if you only have one of your sites activated, then would the park url's only show the normal links /showthread=9202 ect ?