vb.org Archive

vb.org Archive (https://vborg.vbsupport.ru/index.php)
-   Community Lounge (https://vborg.vbsupport.ru/forumdisplay.php?f=13)
-   -   Satan's Version (https://vborg.vbsupport.ru/showthread.php?t=91830)

m0nde 07-08-2005 02:47 PM

Satan's Version
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by hellsatan
Satan

Um, just curious...It says in your profile that you're using v4.07. Is this a joke, or am I missing something?

Revan 07-08-2005 02:54 PM

As you know, satan has time-travelling powers. He skipped forward in time and brought this version back with him. Now naturally, Jelsoft doesn't want other people to see what they haven't even created yet, so he isn't allowed to use it on his live forum or mention it in any form beyond the version number here on vBorg.
;)

m0nde 07-08-2005 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Revan
As you know, satan has time-travelling powers. He skipped forward in time and brought this version back with him. Now naturally, Jelsoft doesn't want other people to see what they haven't even created yet, so he isn't allowed to use it on his live forum or mention it in any form beyond the version number here on vBorg.
;)

I guess he's like doctor who...

- Sid

Chris M 07-08-2005 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by m0nde
I guess he's like doctor who...

- Sid

I had to restrict it to 4.0.7 - After 4.0.7 it switches from version numbers to names, and as Revan said, it's supposed to be a secret ;)

Satan

Corriewf 07-08-2005 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by m0nde
Um, just curious...It says in your profile that you're using v4.07. Is this a joke, or am I missing something?

To be more accurate hes actually not using the most up to future date version of VB. However in the future we dont call it "VB", just V as Jelsoft buys out Microsoft.

Than Walmart buys Jelsoft and removes the B as they think it could be offensive .

You can read more about it here:
https://vborg.vbsupport.ru/showthrea...7&page=3&pp=15

Revan 07-08-2005 08:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by corriewf
To be more accurate hes actually not using the most up to future date version of VB. However in the future we dont call it "VB", just V as Jelsoft buys out Microsoft.

Than Walmart buys Jelsoft and removes the B as they think it could be offensive .

What part of "secret" didn't you understand!?

Corriewf 07-08-2005 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Revan
What part of "secret" didn't you understand!?

When you can travel into the future the defintion of the word has no meaning.

Chris M 07-08-2005 09:21 PM

In the year 2345 the word "secret" actually means something entirely different;)

Satan

Guest190829 07-08-2005 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by m0nde
Um, just curious...It says in your profile that you're using v4.07. Is this a joke, or am I missing something?

There's a v4.0.7 !?! Why wasn't this officially announced?! And WHERE CAN I GET GAMES FOR v3 ARCADE!?!?! And WHERE CAN I GET THE CHAT HACK THAT THEY USE HERE?! I want answers :mad:

Marco van Herwaarden 07-08-2005 09:55 PM

4.0.7, what a joke

Chris M 07-08-2005 10:22 PM

It's ironic that now people notice when I've had that as my vB version for at least 6 months :p

Satan

twoseven 07-08-2005 11:41 PM

i noticed it just thought it was a small type-0 but anyhow congrats on 4.07 i guess the ajax works nicely and they put admincp hooks in i just wonder what else is in store for the 4.x series... oh not to mention multi-db support

Andreas 07-08-2005 11:56 PM

Time-Travels are, even theoretically, impossible - at least within one universe.

Zachery 07-09-2005 12:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KirbyDE
Time-Travels are, even theoretically, impossible - at least within one universe.

Guess you arn't up to date on your time travle theroy then.

Andreas 07-09-2005 12:15 AM

Hmm ... might be. Cou you give me an update? :)

Situation: I am bored of Life, therefor I decide to travel back in Time to kill my Parents, so I won't be alive now (which is the future for Time X to which I went back).
But if I am not alive now, how would I then be able to travel back to kill my Parents?
By changing the Past, I open a totally different timeline/reality - that's why I said it's not possible within one Universe. If there are parallel Universes that share the same space it might be possible.

Chris M 07-09-2005 12:22 AM

It is possible ;)

You simply have to ignore the temporal issues associated with such an event, and it all works out :)

Satan

Corriewf 07-09-2005 03:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by twoseven
i noticed it just thought it was a small type-0 but anyhow congrats on 4.07 i guess the ajax works nicely and they put admincp hooks in i just wonder what else is in store for the 4.x series... oh not to mention multi-db support


There are no hooks because in the future we write the code using our brain and transfer via the tsb cord that replaces the bsb cord that replaced the usb.... Dont even ask what happens when it crashes!

Oh and we dont use wireless because in future they ban wireless to get rid of people with cell phones in movie theaters...

Quote:

Originally Posted by KirbyDE
Hmm ... might be. Cou you give me an update? :)

Situation: I am bored of Life, therefor I decide to travel back in Time to kill my Parents, so I won't be alive now (which is the future for Time X to which I went back).
But if I am not alive now, how would I then be able to travel back to kill my Parents?
By changing the Past, I open a totally different timeline/reality - that's why I said it's not possible within one Universe. If there are parallel Universes that share the same space it might be possible.

In the future we figure out that reality is just a word created to explain what is happening currently and doesnt actually represent the levels of our current time and space.

Zachery 07-09-2005 03:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KirbyDE
Hmm ... might be. Cou you give me an update? :)

Situation: I am bored of Life, therefor I decide to travel back in Time to kill my Parents, so I won't be alive now (which is the future for Time X to which I went back).
But if I am not alive now, how would I then be able to travel back to kill my Parents?
By changing the Past, I open a totally different timeline/reality - that's why I said it's not possible within one Universe. If there are parallel Universes that share the same space it might be possible.

It all depends on which is possible, even without paralelle deminisions, you've basicly undone a part of history, and whipe yourself out. You were alive to kill him but after he died you are no longer possible, and snuffed out. But, its really best not to wrap your head around such things, it causes massive pain :D

m0nde 07-09-2005 07:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KirbyDE
Time-Travels are, even theoretically, impossible - at least within one universe.

Kirby, everyone seems to agree that time travel into the future is quite possible because of the "arrow of time" concept. This is an integral part of the general theory of relativity. However, time travel into the past is another issue. Anything is possible, but it's much less probable that time travel into the past could be accomplished.

We travel into the future every day. When you travel in a plane time passes a bit faster for you than when you travel around on the surface of the earth. This has been proven with atomic clocks on board aircraft and spacecraft.

There's another interesting thing about simply viewing future events which again people think is possible.

Here are some things to read about actual time travel:

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/time/
http://science.howstuffworks.com/time-travel.htm
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/time-travel-phys/

- Sid

Revan 07-09-2005 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by corriewf
There are no hooks because in the future we write the code using our brain and transfer via the tsb cord that replaces the bsb cord that replaced the usb.... Dont even ask what happens when it crashes!

Parse errors are fatal to us ;)

Erwin 07-09-2005 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KirbyDE
Hmm ... might be. Cou you give me an update? :)

Situation: I am bored of Life, therefor I decide to travel back in Time to kill my Parents, so I won't be alive now (which is the future for Time X to which I went back).
But if I am not alive now, how would I then be able to travel back to kill my Parents?
By changing the Past, I open a totally different timeline/reality - that's why I said it's not possible within one Universe. If there are parallel Universes that share the same space it might be possible.

Killing your parents by going back in time doesn't affect you as you already exist. So YOUR timeline still exists in you. You can go back to the future and continue YOUR timeline.

Xenon 07-09-2005 12:01 PM

you won't be there to check that out anymore and everyone else thinks everything's ok ;)

Chris M 07-09-2005 01:22 PM

In theory if you murdered them before you existed you can't have murdered them because you didn't exist ;)

Therefore go back in time and kill loads of people you hate from the past then return to the future and have gotten away with murder :D

Satan

Corriewf 07-09-2005 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Revan
Parse errors are fatal to us ;)

Yes and sql database errors will make your genitals fall off.... True in the future they can be put back on using the nano bots but still, it hurts.

Quote:

Originally Posted by hellsatan
In theory if you murdered them before you existed you can't have murdered them because you didn't exist ;)

Therefore go back in time and kill loads of people you hate from the past then return to the future and have gotten away with murder :D

Satan


Hey, you know what would be better? Go back in time with like a $1,000.00 and buy stock in microsoft or just create microsoft before Bill Gates does.

Chris M 07-10-2005 10:27 AM

I'd buy $1,000.00 in stock because I have no idea how to, or cannot be bothered to code stuff like Windows, MSDOS etc :p

Satan

m0nde 07-10-2005 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hellsatan
I'd buy $1,000.00 in stock because I have no idea how to, or cannot be bothered to code stuff like Windows, MSDOS etc :p

Satan

but i thought MSDOS & Windows W E R E coded by satan!!

- Sid

Chris M 07-10-2005 01:03 PM

No... Just one of my underlings ;)

I could probably code it if I actually bothered to try, but since I can't be bothered, I simply assume that I can't at all :p

Satan

Corriewf 07-11-2005 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hellsatan
No... Just one of my underlings ;)

I could probably code it if I actually bothered to try, but since I can't be bothered, I simply assume that I can't at all :p

Satan


Well since bill gates is one of your minions, I guess theres no need huh.

Chris M 07-11-2005 02:06 PM

Exactly ;)

Satan

Corriewf 07-11-2005 02:31 PM

Too bad your vb version isnt as leet as mine.

Chris M 07-11-2005 02:45 PM

As I said, after 4.0.7 it becomes names - 5.1.0 GOLD is not vB ;)

Satan

Corriewf 07-11-2005 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hellsatan
As I said, after 4.0.7 it becomes names - 5.1.0 GOLD is not vB ;)

Satan

I know its actually V.1.0 , but people here would not be able to comprehend that version so I put it in terms they can deal with at this time.


Dude 4.0.7 was back when you had to actually click something to ban a member, all I have to do is think or say it and they are banned.

Oh and by the way Geek is still around doing hacks in the future but in the future he is known as Geek v 4.5 as his brain was transplanted into a computer to farm for hacks.

Chris M 07-11-2005 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by corriewf
I know its actually V.1.0 , but people here would not be able to comprehend that version so I put it in terms they can deal with at this time.


Dude 4.0.7 was back when you had to actually click something to ban a member, all I have to do is think or say it and they are banned.

Oh and by the way Geek is still around doing hacks in the future but in the future he is known as Geek v 4.5 as his brain was transplanted into a computer to farm for hacks.

I have been forbidden to reveal the depths of the future of vB ;)

The version you are talking about is a mere blip on the scales of what is to come...

The reason I only run 4.0.7 is because I have to give the present day vB'ers some hope of actually achieving the version I run ;)

It's like teasing them really...

Unfortunately after 85 years of development I cannot run any of these versions on these pre-reformation computers - The language and letters alter too significantly for a current day ASCII system to recognise, therefore the numbering and naming becomes obselete...

But in about 80 years time a server with the post-reformation requirements may run early versions of the new software ;)

Satan

Corriewf 07-11-2005 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hellsatan
I have been forbidden to reveal the depths of the future of vB ;)

The version you are talking about is a mere blip on the scales of what is to come...

The reason I only run 4.0.7 is because I have to give the present day vB'ers some hope of actually achieving the version I run ;)

It's like teasing them really...

Unfortunately after 85 years of development I cannot run any of these versions on these pre-reformation computers - The language and letters alter too significantly for a current day ASCII system to recognise, therefore the numbering and naming becomes obselete...

But in about 80 years time a server with the post-reformation requirements may run early versions of the new software ;)

Satan



You could always convert it from ASCIII to ASCII using the built in tools in Windows operating system 2085.

Chris M 07-11-2005 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by corriewf
You could always convert it from ASCIII to ASCII using the built in tools in Windows operating system 2085.

But then I would have to bring back components and other bits of software from the future...

And several power converters :(

Too much hassle:p

Satan

Corriewf 07-11-2005 03:17 PM

The current bus speeds on the processors couldnt handle it nor could our present day memory .

Chris M 07-11-2005 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by corriewf
The current bus speeds on the processors couldnt handle it nor could our present day memory .

Exactly - I may as well bring back several servers and terminals - The problem then is converting the forum layout and content to a non-reformation format for present day visitors :ermm:

Satan

Corriewf 07-11-2005 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hellsatan
Exactly - I may as well bring back several servers and terminals - The problem then is converting the forum layout and content to a non-reformation format for present day visitors :ermm:

Satan

Yeah but then you have the problem with people only have 4 mps tops. I mean in the future we have a transfer rate of 2.5 terabytes per second. I dont think the site would ever load for these " normal " people.

Chris M 07-11-2005 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by corriewf
Yeah but then you have the problem with people only have 4 mps tops. I mean in the future we have a transfer rate of 2.5 terabytes per second. I dont think the site would ever load for these " normal " people.

I had thought about that...

Multiple OC-48 connections connected to a pre-reformation bandwidth converter connected to a post-reformation bandwidth convert might provide enough power for the server to deliver high-end broadband level packet sizes :)

But this is highly theoretical ;)

Remember - To power a server for a minute, even with the most efficient pre-to-post reformation power converters, it would take 3 trillion trillion KW of energy :ermm:

Satan

Corriewf 07-11-2005 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hellsatan
I had thought about that...

Multiple OC-48 connections connected to a pre-reformation bandwidth converter connected to a post-reformation bandwidth convert might provide enough power for the server to deliver high-end broadband level packet sizes :)

But this is highly theoretical ;)

Remember - To power a server for a minute, even with the most efficient pre-to-post reformation power converters, it would take 3 trillion trillion KW of energy :ermm:

Satan


Yes and this isnt even factoring in the small tcp/ip receive windows that " normal " people have. Even if they seen the site it would look more like the matrix then what they are used to. They would need the decryption chip that Jelsoft releases in 2074 just to convert the header.

3.5 BETA HA!


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by vBS
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

X vBulletin 3.8.12 by vBS Debug Information
  • Page Generation 0.01490 seconds
  • Memory Usage 1,848KB
  • Queries Executed 10 (?)
More Information
Template Usage:
  • (1)ad_footer_end
  • (1)ad_footer_start
  • (1)ad_header_end
  • (1)ad_header_logo
  • (1)ad_navbar_below
  • (26)bbcode_quote_printable
  • (1)footer
  • (1)gobutton
  • (1)header
  • (1)headinclude
  • (6)option
  • (1)pagenav
  • (1)pagenav_curpage
  • (1)pagenav_pagelink
  • (1)post_thanks_navbar_search
  • (1)printthread
  • (40)printthreadbit
  • (1)spacer_close
  • (1)spacer_open 

Phrase Groups Available:
  • global
  • postbit
  • showthread
Included Files:
  • ./printthread.php
  • ./global.php
  • ./includes/init.php
  • ./includes/class_core.php
  • ./includes/config.php
  • ./includes/functions.php
  • ./includes/class_hook.php
  • ./includes/modsystem_functions.php
  • ./includes/class_bbcode_alt.php
  • ./includes/class_bbcode.php
  • ./includes/functions_bigthree.php 

Hooks Called:
  • init_startup
  • init_startup_session_setup_start
  • init_startup_session_setup_complete
  • cache_permissions
  • fetch_threadinfo_query
  • fetch_threadinfo
  • fetch_foruminfo
  • style_fetch
  • cache_templates
  • global_start
  • parse_templates
  • global_setup_complete
  • printthread_start
  • pagenav_page
  • pagenav_complete
  • bbcode_fetch_tags
  • bbcode_create
  • bbcode_parse_start
  • bbcode_parse_complete_precache
  • bbcode_parse_complete
  • printthread_post
  • printthread_complete