![]() |
Dreamweaver.. ARGH!!
I was editting functions.php while trying to install a hack and dreamweaver autocorrected (and totally fouled up) another line elsewhere in the code. This is the first time I've ever seen it do this - anyone know how to prevent it in the future?
|
I don't use dreamweaver and other similar programs due to their interface which are mostly designed for newbie coders imho, I feel like the program trys to do to much for me.
If you are looking for a good php editor I recomend editplus, the free trail is unlimited, I bought a copy of it not to long ago because I liked the software so much. If you decide to keep using dreamweaver im sure someone has the solution for you, but I highly recomend looking at other programs. :) |
Quote:
|
Dreamweaver is an extrmemly powerful tool. It's used by all major professional web builders. However, if all your'e doing is inserting a query or altering a single line or two of code.. use a text editor. Dreamweaver is OUTSTANDING at creating sites. It's not always the best tool to use when editing sites created elsewhere.
And by the rational above.. I guess Photoshop is for new image creators that really don't know how to create the image with code..... open a photoshop file with a text editor.. can you write that? There's no harm in using software designed to make your job easier. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I use Jext for all my programming, it's a basic text editor that colourizes text. All you need :)
I can stand auto correctors, wizards and all that jazz. They never work properly and never let you do what you want. And I agree with you Tigga, it's a very powerful tool and you can create some very professional pages with it, but not many professional developers use it. |
Dreamweaver itself is an awswome tool, as long as you dont do a few things, i never had a problem using it as long as i never setup a virtual test site, thats when it adds funky code. :)
However ive moved away from using DW to notepad++ or just a notepad :D for when im lazy. |
Yeah.. at 23 years old Brian (Tigga) you really have a world of experience don't you?
There are many, many, many professionals using Dreamweaver. Obviously you're just not exposed to the high-end coding that takes place at some corporations. |
Quote:
|
wordpad all da way ^.^
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
And either way, that's just my opinion about the program and nothing more. I've never had a need for it and always thought it better to just do the code the good ol' fashoned way with a simple text editor and Photoshop. If it helps you out then great, take advantage of the tool. For me though, the few times I've used it, or been given a site to work on that used it, it took me more time to clean up the coding that the program put out than it would have for me just to write everything myself. A site may look good in the end result, but I still consider it crap if the coding is not done well. |
Quote:
Kier, from vB Team, also likes a lot the DW software, beside TextPad. :) I guess is all related to what you are used to... I personally like TextPad. Regards, Floren. |
I've been in the design industry for more than 15 years. And Web development end of that for at least 5, More often than not a professional company will rely on Dreamweaver in conjuction with a good text editor. It's a rare business anymroe that is willing to pay an employee to hand code everything when it can be done in 10 minutes via Dreamweaver.
In fact I just got back from the Digital Design World Conference in Seattle where Dreamweaver is a staple of the conference as it is all major industry gatherings. |
Quote:
|
IMHO Dreamweaver is great, especially for "prototyping".
But as the focus of vB.org is mainly programming and not design I think there are better tools for this: (Simple) Editors with syntax-highlighting. |
Quote:
PhpEDIT is a great program that I am using, it is great for testing for errors while coding. |
I think you'll find many people can also code as quickly by hand as they can within dreamweaver ((X)HTML that is) :)
|
Quote:
|
At the end of the day all that matters is getting the job done, if dreamweaver helps you shave a few hours off total development time then defentaly use it. But as far as merly modifying a php file, who needs all that extra overhead?
As far as coding by hand vr. dreamweaver gose, I can see a advanage to begin able to preview on the fly, I just can't stand de-bugging the code that programs like that output. At the end of the day, for me at least, I can code quicker by just doing it by hand, saving to my dev box, then de-bugging my own code. |
Quote:
|
He's saying that HE hardcodes and that the developers he's seen in action also do so.
I've been developing only a few years (maybe 5) and I can see a use for Dreamweaver (just don't mention the "f" word!) - but I also find that I can code up a site in about half the time by hand than it would take to gen up a layout in DW then tidy it up so it validates ... This war has been fought before ... let's let it be said - NEVER try to modify vB code files in DW unless you are very good at debugging screwups. |
In the interest of getting my thread back from being a debate about the merits of Dreamweaver I'll reiterate my question - HOW DO I TURN OFF THE AUTOCORRECTOR??
I didn't mean to touch off a merits of Dreamweaver and other editors. :( |
Quote:
|
In terms of design, if I owned a web development firm I would never hire somebody who's never (or rarely) coded out of a WYSIWYG editor. I work currently at a programming job for a company, with 3 others, and deal with MySQL/PHP/design stuff. I've been web designing for about 4 years now, and have always used a text editor of somesort (last 2 years in textpad). Two of my coworkers, who are master students in Computer Science, have always used dreamweaver, and while their code in terms of functionality is ok, in terms of complying with standards or readability, it isn't. I've never known a good web designer who makes extremely code-clean, standard-complying, and visually appealing web pages in a WYSIWYG editors.
As far as doing server side programming, it's not bad with all the tag and function references, but seems too cluttered for my taste. Textpad is simple, extremely effective, and makes the work flow fast. Dreamweaver seems most popular among older web developers, perhaps because it's of a well known and accomplished company. There are other lesser known companies though that make good editors. ;) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I'm a Mac person who has authored and kept up my own minor league web site since January 1996. I'm not a 'professional'.
Originally I 'hard' (hand) coded the entire site. Currently I use Dreamweaver a lot and use BBEdit for cleanup and for files where I 'can't afford a mistake' such as server config files which aren't in my Dreamweaver site files anyway. Dreamweaver has not, however, ever caused me a problem with a web site edit whether php file or simple html or xhtml files were concerned. My powerbook is also my testbed. When it's OK here it's an upload to my site. Yes - this 'battle' has been fought many times and I am sure will continue to attract controversy. If one doesn't understand what a program like Dreamweaver can and does do, I'm not convinced that a straight ASCI editor will profit them. They have some learning to do. I agree that an asci editor is the best way for someone to really 'get in there' and understand every space, every line, in a file and understand what it is doing. None the less - Dreamweaver and other 'User Friendly' editors have their place. In fact, using Dreamweaver has taught me a lot. Have several tools at ready and use the one that best suits the job at hand. But remember - If you have a tool but don't know how to use it or the concepts involved it is useless... |
"My balls better than your ball"
I hate these arguements, When will people realise that the basketball good for basketball but not that great for football. Dreamweaver has it's place in the design side of thing and I use it for that along with Photoshop but when it comes to php coding I use Homesites because I prefer it. Each to their own but don't slate a product because some people can't use it or don't know how to turn off the auto correct features ;) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
All of this discussion makes me wanna check out Allaire Homesite - I use EmEditor as a weopon of choice, mainly cos I like climbing mountains with toothpicks and kitchen string :D
|
You're all amatuers
*chips zeros and ones into a big stone tablet* :p |
Quote:
Also, I would be a little cautious with the whole age bashing thing. I believe that if you are good enough you are old enough. All major corporates have their own philosophy and "way" of doing things. Two equally successful companies may have radically different approaches and nether are wrong. It is just a case of finding what works best for you. However I would add that I love aspects of dreamweaver, it has saved me a lot of time, and programs like contribute allow me to focus on important things rather than being bogged down with minor text updates. But beware of the WYSIWYG auto correct facilities. Just like the grammar check in a lot of typing programs like Microsoft Word? just because the computer tells you it is so doesn?t mean it is. Think with your head and not your software. |
Quote:
On a Norwegian keyboard, the / key is either Shift+7 or above the NumPad 8, and < and > are one key just above the Windows key. So its tons easier to just type '<br>' and then see them automatically converted to '<br />'. Also I use the 'XHTML convert' function to make sure I remembered to end all <input>'s correctly, etc. If this IYO makes me a shide coder, then I quite frankly don't give a furret's anus :p Quote:
Either uncheck it all, or exclude .php and .php3 files from such rewriting :) |
Quote:
|
Hah well see thats work to be done in the aftermath of the coding, ye?
And <br> to <br /> is just one of many examples. Dya think Notepad saves you time if you have to convert: * <br> to <br /> * <input> to <input /> * <img> to <img alt="" /> et cetera ;) |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:24 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by vBS
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
X vBulletin 3.8.12 by vBS Debug Information | |
---|---|
|
|
![]() |
|
Template Usage:
Phrase Groups Available:
|
Included Files:
Hooks Called:
|