vb.org Archive

vb.org Archive (https://vborg.vbsupport.ru/index.php)
-   vBulletin.org Site Feedback (https://vborg.vbsupport.ru/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   Question - Any reason vb.org hasn't upgraded? (https://vborg.vbsupport.ru/showthread.php?t=322620)

John Diver 05-12-2016 09:29 PM

Question - Any reason vb.org hasn't upgraded?
 
Hey,

I haven't upgraded my sites - I like 3.8 - But because of spam Im thinking maybe upgrading would *hopefully* help.

Is there any reason vb.org hasnt upgraded?

Dave 05-12-2016 10:07 PM

They use a bunch of custom plugins which will have to be ported over to vBulletin 4.
Also I guess "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" is valid in this scenario.

Dr.CustUmz 05-12-2016 11:16 PM

vb.org actually in fact did just upgrade, they ran 3.6.x for the longest time and a couple weeks ago updated to 3.8.10, they stay with vb3 because it's the best (duh).

upgrading plugins... that is not the reason... they had to upgrade all sorts of plugins just to do the upgrade they just did. But I guess you'd have to hear that from an admin.

But IMO they stick with vb3 because its not bloated how vb4+ is, it's simple, its perfect. Regarding your spam issue install the plugin I linked to in your other thread, I was having the same issue, that product will block almost all spam =)

Max Taxable 05-13-2016 01:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John Diver (Post 2570647)
Hey,

I haven't upgraded my sites - I like 3.8 - But because of spam Im thinking maybe upgrading would *hopefully* help.

Is there any reason vb.org hasnt upgraded?

"Upgrading" doesn't improve spam problems.

cabinweb 05-13-2016 08:16 AM

Great forum for discussions.

steviewonder44 05-13-2016 02:57 PM

I just went back to vb 3.8.10 Beta 1 and its so much better than the bloated newer versions. Besides I save alot of bandwidth with it

Dave 05-13-2016 03:17 PM

The main reason why I use vB4 is because vB3 makes extensively use of tables, which makes it harder to customize the template and to give it a unique look. I can usually tell if a forum is using vB3 by one quick look.

MarkFL 05-13-2016 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 2570692)
The main reason why I use vB4 is because vB3 makes extensively use of tables, which makes it harder to customize the template and to give it a unique look. I can usually tell if a forum is using vB3 by one quick look.

Yes, and with vB 4 you have elements with CSS classes which also makes customization much easier, whether you are adding CSS or adding a template hook you need on the fly. vB 4 stores more data in arrays, while vB 3 will return a wall of table related HTML...I much prefer the arrays.

Both version have their merits of course, but as a coder, I find vB 4.2.x to be easier to work with in many ways.

Dave, I think you are also correct about the reason vBorg has not upgrade to vB 4...porting the products/styles would be a nightmare. :)

TheLastSuperman 05-13-2016 05:30 PM

https://vborg.vbsupport.ru/showthread.php?t=234458

#8.

Big ole' sticky thread too, it's right at the top of the forum in bold red font "Sticky" plus not to mention the title includes Read First.

Don't mind me, my wife always "gets me good" more so than me pointing out sticky threads so laugh AT me not with me on that one eh? ;) :cool:

Paul M 05-13-2016 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John Diver (Post 2570647)
Is there any reason vb.org hasnt upgraded?

We upgraded to 3.8.10 (from 3.6.12) not long ago. That is the latest (vB3) version.

We have no plan or requirement to change from vB3.
It would be a massive task, not worth it when the site runs just fine on vB3.


(JFYI, it would make no difference to spam.)


The advice for upgrading is the same as its always been, only do it if there is a *real* need, not just for the sake of it.

rinkrat 05-30-2016 09:33 PM

Exactly now I feel about staying with VB 4.

CarpCharacin 07-06-2016 01:53 AM

you should upgrade to 5 and make it look like 3

Replicant 07-06-2016 02:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CarpCharacin (Post 2572863)
you should upgrade to 5 and make it look like 3

HAHAHAHAHA!...

CarpCharacin 07-06-2016 08:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Replicant (Post 2572864)
HAHAHAHAHA!...

what is so funny?

Paul M 07-06-2016 11:34 AM

Why on earth would we do something like that, it would be completely poinless.

CarpCharacin 07-06-2016 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul M (Post 2572875)
Why on earth would we do something like that, it would be completely poinless.

Because the style is good.

Paul M 07-06-2016 04:11 PM

So we would spend hundreds of hours converting all the modifications and tweaks to vB5 (not sure we could even do that) ..... hundeds of hours creating a style that looked like this, and numerous hours actually upgrading ... all for somthing that looks the same, and works [almost] the same, but likely runs slower.

I dont think anyone here is that insane. :erm:

CarpCharacin 07-07-2016 04:15 AM

vb5 is quick when it runs good.

MarkFL 07-07-2016 04:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CarpCharacin (Post 2572929)
vb5 is quick when it runs good.

For the sake of argument, let's assume speed isn't a factor...there are still these very important points:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul M (Post 2572889)
So we would spend hundreds of hours converting all the modifications and tweaks to vB5 (not sure we could even do that) ..... hundreds of hours creating a style that looked like this, and numerous hours actually upgrading ... all for something that looks the same, and works [almost] the same...


CarpCharacin 07-07-2016 05:18 PM

sites need upgrades. You can let a site run for 57 million years just because it would take work to upgrade, but that site is outdated and needs to be upgraded.

Max Taxable 07-07-2016 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CarpCharacin (Post 2572964)
sites need upgrades. You can let a site run for 57 million years just because it would take work to upgrade, but that site is outdated and needs to be upgraded.

Sites don't need "upgrades" just for sake of upgrading, either.

CarpCharacin 07-07-2016 08:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Max Taxable (Post 2572968)
Sites don't need "upgrades" just for sake of upgrading, either.

they need upgrades to keep up with the times

Paul M 07-07-2016 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CarpCharacin (Post 2572972)
they need upgrades to keep up with the times

No they dont. Upgrading for the sake of it is a terrible plan.

Max Taxable 07-08-2016 01:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CarpCharacin (Post 2572972)
they need upgrades to keep up with the times

That's a matter of subjective opinion. I'll stick to facts - I can name you many vBulletin boards - big ones - that are still running version 3.x and one that's even still on version 2.6!

It's silly to assume one must "upgrade" just for the sake of upgrading, and like Paul said it's also poor planning and strategy.

RichieBoy67 07-08-2016 07:31 AM

If the site is running smoothly and there are no compatibility issues with newer browsers and no security issues then I see no reason to upgrade.

CarpCharacin 07-08-2016 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Max Taxable (Post 2572979)
That's a matter of subjective opinion. I'll stick to facts - I can name you many vBulletin boards - big ones - that are still running version 3.x and one that's even still on version 2.6!

It's silly to assume one must "upgrade" just for the sake of upgrading, and like Paul said it's also poor planning and strategy.

What one is still running 2.6?

Max Taxable 07-08-2016 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CarpCharacin (Post 2573003)
What one is still running 2.6?

It's actually 2.2.9

http://forums.somethingawful.com/


You don't know that you don't know, is all.

6,229 Users Logged In
5,888 registered users logged in.
195,624 users total. 2,628,812 total threads.
63,237,156 total posts. 3,358,965 archived threads.
177,503,398 archived posts.

Replicant 07-08-2016 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Max Taxable (Post 2573007)
It's actually 2.2.9


6,229 Users Logged In
5,888 registered users logged in.
195,624 users total. 2,628,812 total threads.
63,237,156 total posts. 3,358,965 archived threads.
177,503,398 archived posts.

Those stats are impressive. The site runs fast too.

Max Taxable 07-08-2016 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Replicant (Post 2573010)
Those stats are impressive. The site runs fast too.

Greasy fast like vBulletin used to be.

Paul M 07-08-2016 05:10 PM

It might be labelled 2.2.9, but I would image the code is heavily modified by now.

Replicant 07-08-2016 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul M (Post 2573015)
It might be labelled 2.2.9, but I would image the code is heavily modified by now.

Hmmmm, kind of like vbulletin.org?

Max Taxable 07-08-2016 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul M (Post 2573015)
It might be labelled 2.2.9, but I would image the code is heavily modified by now.

Not nearly as much as one might assume. It's not just a label.

CarpCharacin 07-09-2016 02:57 AM

Is the future of vbulletin bright or dark?

MarkFL 07-09-2016 03:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CarpCharacin (Post 2573036)
Is the future of vbulletin bright or dark?

Start developing and uploading them killer must have products, and it can only get brighter. :eek::D:up:

CarpCharacin 07-09-2016 05:11 AM

It should be upgraded.

Paul M 07-09-2016 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Replicant (Post 2573020)
Hmmmm, kind of like vbulletin.org?

Actually, no, there are only three actual php file edits, and one js file edit (which can be got rid of, I just havent done so).
All the customisations are via the custom style (i.e. templates), plugins and three additional vb.org specific files


Quote:

Originally Posted by CarpCharacin (Post 2573038)
It should be upgraded.

It ?

If you are talking about vb.org then no, it should not.
The only upgrade in the next 12 months is likely to be a switch to vB 3.8.11.

CarpCharacin 07-10-2016 04:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul M (Post 2573053)
Actually, no, there are only three actual php file edits, and one js file edit (which can be got rid of, I just havent done so).
All the customisations are via the custom style (i.e. templates), plugins and three additional vb.org specific files



It ?

If you are talking about vb.org then no, it should not.
The only upgrade in the next 12 months is likely to be a switch to vB 3.8.11.

why were you running 3.6 and how did you get a 3.6 style to work on 3.8? Why didn't you upgrade to 3.7?

Paul M 07-10-2016 11:24 AM

1. Read the forums and you will find the answer to your first question.

2. Why would we bother upgrading to 3.7 and not 3.8, that would be pointless.

TBH, Im not really sure why you seem so fixated on what version we run here.

blind-eddie 07-10-2016 12:54 PM

Sorry, I had to....


http://northamericancarclub.com/imag.../two/horse.gif

Max Taxable 07-10-2016 09:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CarpCharacin (Post 2573067)
how did you get a 3.6 style to work on 3.8?

Umm, that's not really very hard to do at all.


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:27 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by vBS
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

X vBulletin 3.8.12 by vBS Debug Information
  • Page Generation 0.03018 seconds
  • Memory Usage 1,825KB
  • Queries Executed 10 (?)
More Information
Template Usage:
  • (1)ad_footer_end
  • (1)ad_footer_start
  • (1)ad_header_end
  • (1)ad_header_logo
  • (1)ad_navbar_below
  • (23)bbcode_quote_printable
  • (1)footer
  • (1)gobutton
  • (1)header
  • (1)headinclude
  • (6)option
  • (1)pagenav
  • (1)pagenav_curpage
  • (1)pagenav_pagelink
  • (1)post_thanks_navbar_search
  • (1)printthread
  • (40)printthreadbit
  • (1)spacer_close
  • (1)spacer_open 

Phrase Groups Available:
  • global
  • postbit
  • showthread
Included Files:
  • ./printthread.php
  • ./global.php
  • ./includes/init.php
  • ./includes/class_core.php
  • ./includes/config.php
  • ./includes/functions.php
  • ./includes/class_hook.php
  • ./includes/modsystem_functions.php
  • ./includes/class_bbcode_alt.php
  • ./includes/class_bbcode.php
  • ./includes/functions_bigthree.php 

Hooks Called:
  • init_startup
  • init_startup_session_setup_start
  • init_startup_session_setup_complete
  • cache_permissions
  • fetch_threadinfo_query
  • fetch_threadinfo
  • fetch_foruminfo
  • style_fetch
  • cache_templates
  • global_start
  • parse_templates
  • global_setup_complete
  • printthread_start
  • pagenav_page
  • pagenav_complete
  • bbcode_fetch_tags
  • bbcode_create
  • bbcode_parse_start
  • bbcode_parse_complete_precache
  • bbcode_parse_complete
  • printthread_post
  • printthread_complete