vb.org Archive

vb.org Archive (https://vborg.vbsupport.ru/index.php)
-   vB4 General Discussions (https://vborg.vbsupport.ru/forumdisplay.php?f=251)
-   -   Does CDN work with vbulletin? (https://vborg.vbsupport.ru/showthread.php?t=313948)

Sharingan_Okami 08-27-2014 12:14 AM

Does CDN work with vbulletin?
 
I was just recently told that my site could use some optimization.

I now started looking into a CDN for the site.

If i got cdn from http://www.maxcdn.com/ , would that work with vbulletin or would it cause issues?

I am willing try anything to make my forum speed increase.

ozzy47 08-27-2014 12:17 AM

Sure, if it set up correctly. This article may help you, https://vborg.vbsupport.ru/showthread.php?t=257127

Max Taxable 08-27-2014 12:19 AM

All it does in theory is deliver static content based on the users location, hoping it is closer.

The only optimization work you need is image compression. A CDN won't do that.

Here's your performance: http://www.webpagetest.org/result/140827_XR_1D9/

Load items 20-24 are killing you. Example:
HTML Code:

20:        http://forbiddenjutsu.com/WP/wp-content/uploads/Forbidden+Jutsu+5.0.jpg
1,231.3 KB image/jpeg
Quality 85 optimized size: 342.0 KB (889.3 KB smaller)

It can be almost 1mb smaller and not lose any visible quality: Optimize images


This test is only valid if that's your site in your signature there.


Who told you you need optimization? Someone who is selling such services? They are either woefully uninformed, or straight up lying to you.

Fix the bloated images and you're set.

If your site is optimized you don't really need a CDN. If your site is not optimized, a CDN really doesn't do squat for you.

ozzy47 08-27-2014 12:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Max Taxable (Post 2512789)
All it does in theory is deliver static content based on the users location, hoping it is closer.

The only optimization work you need is image compression. A CDN won't do that.

Here's your performance: http://www.webpagetest.org/result/140827_XR_1D9/

Load items 20-24 are killing you. Example:
HTML Code:

20:    http://forbiddenjutsu.com/WP/wp-content/uploads/Forbidden+Jutsu+5.0.jpg
1,231.3 KB image/jpeg
Quality 85 optimized size: 342.0 KB (889.3 KB smaller)

It can be almost 1mb smaller and not lose any visible quality: Optimize images


This test is only valid if that's your site in your signature there.


Who told you you need optimization? Someone who is selling such services? They are either woefully uninformed, or straight up lying to you.

Fix the bloated images and you're set.



It was me in this thread, https://vborg.vbsupport.ru/showthread.php?t=313943

Max Taxable 08-27-2014 12:23 AM

Other then the bloated images he is golden.

ozzy47 08-27-2014 12:23 AM

Now he is, before he was not, till he added the htaccess stuff. :)

Max Taxable 08-27-2014 12:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ozzy47 (Post 2512792)
Now he is, before he was not, till he added the htaccess stuff. :)

Sweet. Nice job.

He doesn't need a CDN, he needs to take 4mb off his page load by optimizing those massive images.

ozzy47 08-27-2014 12:26 AM

Correct. :)

Sharingan_Okami 08-27-2014 12:30 AM

Yes, thanks for the info @ozzy47 & @Max Taxable.

I will reduce the file size of those images & i hope that reduces a couple millisoconds of load time :D

ozzy47 08-27-2014 12:32 AM

It most certainly should shave some time off the load time. :)

Max Taxable 08-27-2014 12:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sharingan_Okami (Post 2512795)
Yes, thanks for the info @ozzy47 & @Max Taxable.

I will reduce the file size of those images & i hope that reduces a couple millisoconds of load time :D

If you do all of them as the link I gave you does for you, I predict we're talking seconds, not milliseconds.

Probably at least four seconds.

Sharingan_Okami 08-27-2014 12:35 AM

What site or program could reduce the file size ? but keep the same lenght & width of the images?

ozzy47 08-27-2014 12:37 AM

Grab the optimized images right from this page, http://www.webpagetest.org/pageimage...run=1&cached=0

Sharingan_Okami 08-27-2014 12:39 AM

Oh nice, i didnt know those were optimized.

Do i just click save as on every image? or do i have to do something else?

Max Taxable 08-27-2014 12:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ozzy47 (Post 2512799)
Grab the optimized images right from this page, http://www.webpagetest.org/pageimage...run=1&cached=0

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sharingan_Okami (Post 2512800)
Oh nice, i didnt know those were optimized.

Do i just click save as on every image? or do i have to do something else?

Yes and for each image, click "analyze jpeg" then select the smallest one out of the three that will come up.

Example:

Call #20 Optimized


Do this for each one you see in the first link.

ozzy47 08-27-2014 12:41 AM

Yep, that's the beauty of that site. :)

Max Taxable 08-27-2014 12:42 AM

It will usually be the third image they show after you click "analyze jpeg" but pay attention to the file sizes, take the smallest one.

After you get them, just re-name them to match what's on the server, then upload to overwrite.

Sharingan_Okami 08-27-2014 12:44 AM

Excellent! I will begin doing this to every image. Thanks for this, i really do appreciate it.

ozzy47 08-27-2014 12:45 AM

Not a problem, glad to help. :)

Max Taxable 08-27-2014 12:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sharingan_Okami (Post 2512804)
Excellent! I will begin doing this to every image. Thanks for this, i really do appreciate it.

It will make your site at least twice as fast as it is now.

Sharingan_Okami 08-27-2014 01:12 AM

:D
It worked, now the speed results have improved once again.
From this:
http://www.webpagetest.org/result/140826_9D_12W8/

to this:
http://www.webpagetest.org/result/140827_CQ_29P/

What is left for me to optimize so that i can also get a good grade on the First Byte Time.

ozzy47 08-27-2014 01:16 AM

Excellent, that is the best that you can hope for, good job on implementing everything. :)

Max Taxable 08-27-2014 01:45 AM

Yeah congratulations. Alot of people don't take all the advice and just try to half-ass it. Or they want a magic bullet. The magic bullet is work.

Look at how your total bandwidth usage per pageload went down from nearly 5mb to only just under 700kb.

EDIT: oops I had tested your main page before, not the forums. Here's what you have done for the main page:

http://www.webpagetest.org/result/140827_2J_2YS/

Still, that's half the bandwidth and the load time is cut in half.

You still need to fix item #24 for even better results:

http://www.webpagetest.org/jpeginfo/...nime-logos.jpg


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:52 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by vBS
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

X vBulletin 3.8.12 by vBS Debug Information
  • Page Generation 0.01361 seconds
  • Memory Usage 1,764KB
  • Queries Executed 10 (?)
More Information
Template Usage:
  • (1)ad_footer_end
  • (1)ad_footer_start
  • (1)ad_header_end
  • (1)ad_header_logo
  • (1)ad_navbar_below
  • (2)bbcode_html_printable
  • (6)bbcode_quote_printable
  • (1)footer
  • (1)gobutton
  • (1)header
  • (1)headinclude
  • (6)option
  • (1)post_thanks_navbar_search
  • (1)printthread
  • (23)printthreadbit
  • (1)spacer_close
  • (1)spacer_open 

Phrase Groups Available:
  • global
  • postbit
  • showthread
Included Files:
  • ./printthread.php
  • ./global.php
  • ./includes/init.php
  • ./includes/class_core.php
  • ./includes/config.php
  • ./includes/functions.php
  • ./includes/class_hook.php
  • ./includes/modsystem_functions.php
  • ./includes/class_bbcode_alt.php
  • ./includes/class_bbcode.php
  • ./includes/functions_bigthree.php 

Hooks Called:
  • init_startup
  • init_startup_session_setup_start
  • init_startup_session_setup_complete
  • cache_permissions
  • fetch_threadinfo_query
  • fetch_threadinfo
  • fetch_foruminfo
  • style_fetch
  • cache_templates
  • global_start
  • parse_templates
  • global_setup_complete
  • printthread_start
  • bbcode_fetch_tags
  • bbcode_create
  • bbcode_parse_start
  • bbcode_parse_complete_precache
  • bbcode_parse_complete
  • printthread_post
  • printthread_complete