vb.org Archive

vb.org Archive (https://vborg.vbsupport.ru/index.php)
-   News and Announcements (https://vborg.vbsupport.ru/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   vBulletin 3.0 Modifications (https://vborg.vbsupport.ru/showthread.php?t=201780)

Paul M 01-14-2009 07:44 PM

vBulletin 3.0 Modifications
 
Now that vBulletin 3.8 has been released we intend to archive the vb 3.0 forums in the next few weeks - in the same manner that the vb 2.x forums were archived last year.

Once archived, the forums will become read only and no downloads will be possible - so if for some reason you still need copies of 3.0 modifications then you will need to download them in the next few weeks.

At this moment in time we are not planning to archive the 3.5 forums, but once vb 4.0 is released we will revisit that decision.

SEOvB 01-14-2009 09:09 PM

Thanks for the warning and update ;)

mac-warez 01-14-2009 11:47 PM

Thanks for the update

Lolliedollie 01-15-2009 12:40 AM

Does that mean you are going to be removing the 3.7 mods too??

Louise. x

Vackrick 01-15-2009 12:41 AM

i dun think so because some of them is still running on 3.7

if they want to remove they will remove the older version of the vbulletin like 3.0 or x

but not 3.6 3.7 and 3.8

kmohamed 01-15-2009 03:28 AM

Thanks for the warning

lazydesis 01-15-2009 04:13 AM

3.0 does not use products .. all other versions after that use products .. so i think they not gonna remove mods after 3.0

excited abt 4.0 :D

RedeemedWarrior 01-15-2009 04:40 AM

thanks for the update!

Rene Kriest 01-15-2009 06:56 AM

Wow, that's shocking news!

Especially the 3.5 to 3.6.x addons are a never ending source of inspiration to me. It seems to me that around the time 3.5 evolved some very creative minds joined forces to produce some high quality bits and bytes for the community. Many of them left or do not have the time to continue their great work but nevertheless keep their quality work a little longer. :)

Marco van Herwaarden 01-15-2009 06:59 AM

Nothing is going to happen to the 3.5 modifications at this time.

Paul M 01-15-2009 07:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lolliedollie (Post 1712770)
Does that mean you are going to be removing the 3.7 mods too??

Louise. x

No.

As the thread states, this refers to 3.0 (only).

Nothing is happening to the 3.5, 3.6, 3.7 or 3.8 sections :)

Hasann 01-15-2009 12:15 PM

why no downloads possible??? whats the main reason?

Wayne Luke 01-15-2009 01:47 PM

I would suspect that having downloads for mods on a version that isn't supported or used anymore would cause more problems than it is worth.

nighteyes 01-15-2009 02:00 PM

I don't really see why you have to block off access to downloads of these older modifications. Sometimes you need access to old code to properly path upgrades to newer products in forums that were badly managed or poorly maintained in the past. I would have thought closing the forums to new replies and making it clear they are read only, unsupported threads would have been enough.

But this site has a whole history of yanking code and making life difficult for some of us. So I'm not surprised. :)

Shelley_c 01-15-2009 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nighteyes (Post 1713392)
I don't really see why you have to block off access to downloads of these older modifications. Sometimes you need access to old code to properly path upgrades to newer products in forums that were badly managed or poorly maintained in the past. I would have thought closing the forums to new replies and making it clear they are read only, unsupported threads would have been enough.

But this site has a whole history of yanking code and making life difficult for some of us. So I'm not surprised. :)

Thank your luck stars you have been alerted of the changes. Normally the forum would have been archived without warning. The announcements is atleast a set forward and gives people the chance to download now what they need rather than wondering what happened to the forums and unable to download anything resulting in questions being asked in the feedback area.

Marco van Herwaarden 01-15-2009 03:05 PM

We have always informed our members in time before we archived a version.

nexialys 01-15-2009 03:07 PM

and it's a good thing...

Shelley_c 01-15-2009 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marco van Herwaarden (Post 1713470)
We have always informed our members in time before we archived a version.

Are you sure about that? Why would brad post in feedback querying the archiving of the x2 series?

nexialys 01-15-2009 03:46 PM

informing members was not always made by announcements sticked on top... i remember each archiving, and i knew about each of the 3 (or 4?) before they were done... i think one of them was announced inside a thread regarding upgrading the forum itself, so it was missed by a lot of people.

btw, NOW it is done for each, so i don't see why the old time is relevant.

Shelley_c 01-15-2009 03:55 PM

That's probably the reason why I missed some. Marco never stated that they integrated notices of the archiving of series/versions within the upgrades announcements. I'm not the one for rushing to get the latest upgrade or hearing about the latest new spiffy release.

Hornstar 01-16-2009 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nighteyes (Post 1713392)
I don't really see why you have to block off access to downloads of these older modifications. Sometimes you need access to old code to properly path upgrades to newer products in forums that were badly managed or poorly maintained in the past. I would have thought closing the forums to new replies and making it clear they are read only, unsupported threads would have been enough.

But this site has a whole history of yanking code and making life difficult for some of us. So I'm not surprised. :)

I think this is a very valid point. It would be very easy to make it clear they are old, unsupported, arhcived modifications. Having it not possible to reply etc. makes this even more clear.

Personally I have no need to download them 3.0.x hacks. but I can only imagine that it could be beneficial keeping them downloadable to those that might need them down the track.

Alfa1 01-17-2009 12:42 AM

Will you move those modifications that work on vb 3.8 to the 3.8 forum?

Dismounted 01-17-2009 03:52 AM

We recommend that you post a new thread in the 3.8 forum - as those who search in the previous forums will not find your modification.

Digital Jedi 01-17-2009 04:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hornstar1337 (Post 1715183)
I think this is a very valid point. It would be very easy to make it clear they are old, unsupported, arhcived modifications. Having it not possible to reply etc. makes this even more clear.

Personally I have no need to download them 3.0.x hacks. but I can only imagine that it could be beneficial keeping them downloadable to those that might need them down the track.

At some point, it isn't worth taking up the space with modifications for a version of vB that only a handful are still using, for an even a smaller number people still using 3.0 modifications, with an even more nominal number of authors offering support for them. Sometimes it's best to do a little trimming if only a tiny few will be inconvenienced. Besides, it's in 3.0 user's best interests to have a reason to stay just a little current, as I can imagine 3.0 has all kinds of vulnerabilities at this point, much less their modifications.

thefifthlord 01-17-2009 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Digital Jedi (Post 1715415)
At some point, it isn't worth taking up the space with modifications for a version of vB that only a handful are still using, for an even a smaller number people still using 3.0 modifications, with an even more nominal number of authors offering support for them. Sometimes it's best to do a little trimming if only a tiny few will be inconvenienced. Besides, it's in 3.0 user's best interests to have a reason to stay just a little current, as I can imagine 3.0 has all kinds of vulnerabilities at this point, much less their modifications.

Perhaps, however this seems like a way for jelsoft to force people to upgrade their vbulletin installations. If people want to use 3.0 and want to develop mods for it, why stop them? I doubt it consumes much bandwidth at all so theres really no reason to archive the forum.

Digital Jedi 01-17-2009 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thefifthlord (Post 1715747)
Perhaps, however this seems like a way for jelsoft to force people to upgrade their vbulletin installations. If people want to use 3.0 and want to develop mods for it, why stop them? I doubt it consumes much bandwidth at all so theres really no reason to archive the forum.

Because at some point, it just doesn't make sense to keep selling parts for the Pintos, when your manufacturing Hybrids.

SCRIPT3R 01-18-2009 12:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Digital Jedi (Post 1715795)
Because at some point, it just doesn't make sense to keep selling parts for the Pintos, when your manufacturing Hybrids.

So you're saying there is financial motivation behind this decision? ;)

Digital Jedi 01-18-2009 03:25 AM

Are you asking me if there's a financial motive to running a business that sells updated software? Why not ask me if there's a financial motive for the grocery store to sell fresh vegetables?

Paul M 01-18-2009 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thefifthlord (Post 1715747)
Perhaps, however this seems like a way for jelsoft to force people to upgrade their vbulletin installations.

Some people have very active imaginations. :)

In fact some people seem to seriously over estimate Jelsofts involvement in vbulletin.org. They provide the servers that we run on, the means for checking if a member is licenced, and a co-ordinator for any advice/issues we may have. Jelsoft do not make any day to day running decisions for vbulletin.org, they are made by the admins.

nexialys 01-18-2009 03:22 PM

from a coder side of things -- which nobody seems to care about, supporting the old hacks that are used by 1% of the population is just harrassment. how much people still use a 3.0 vBulletin, and in that number, how much are using the hacks released here?!... compare to the number of coders who are still supporting their 3.0 hacks, and you will find a number close to zero... forcing these guys to continue supporting their old hacks is just slavery.

oh, btw Paul M, you are right about Jelsoft on vb.org, but i think they are mostly refering to supporting the older versions abroad the system... vbulletin.com is not supporting it anymore, so it's good to follow their support -- if you still have vb 3.0, you have to hire/call for specific support.

Ryan Ashbrook 01-18-2009 05:50 PM

I've already gone through the forum and archived some mods that still interest me that haven't been updated to 3.5 or later.

Porting and updating old mods to work on my forums is kinda like a weird hobby to me...

I only wish I could have gone through the vB2 Archives before they got moved, there's a treasure trove of information in there that I missed out on...

Thanks for the advance warning though. :)

Hornstar 01-18-2009 10:57 PM

that's exactly right. A treasure trove of information awaiting to be ported. There are still many good hacks back in the 3.0.x days that have not been ported for one reason or the other and if given the time they might benefit the imagination of a coder to get ideas on how to port it.

Shazz 01-18-2009 11:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hornstar1337 (Post 1717283)
that's exactly right. A treasure trove of information awaiting to be ported. There are still many good hacks back in the 3.0.x days that have not been ported for one reason or the other and if given the time they might benefit the imagination of a coder to get ideas on how to port it.

Thats like less than 5%.

Hornstar 01-19-2009 03:56 AM

most likely but still a percentage that would end up benefiting maybe a much higher percentage if some were ported. Either way, just a suggestion for vb to consider.
//my 2 cents

Digital Jedi 01-19-2009 07:10 AM

What's in the 3.0 section that hasn't already been worked into vB core functionality?

Ryan Ashbrook 01-19-2009 11:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Digital Jedi (Post 1717606)
What's in the 3.0 section that hasn't already been worked into vB core functionality?

From my current list:

Download Thread
Email Client
Hacks Database
Karma for Posting in Special Threads
Top Stats (a.k.a. Server Stats... without using Debug Mode. Though I guess some of this gets covered in the ACP)
Triple Triad
Age Limit for specific forums
Anonymous Poster / Anonymous Moderator
HTTP Authentication for Non-Forum Pages
Rap Battle System

There's no need for most of these hacks to be added to the core, but I couldn't find any versions for newer vB versions. (Well, I didn't exactly look hard, I mainly used the Similar Threads feature to determine whether it's worth archiving or not.)

The real question, though, is how many hacks that are available in the 3.0.x section are now paid products. The two that spring to mind are:

RPG System
Almost any type of elaborate SEO Plugin

Digital Jedi 01-20-2009 05:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ryan Ashbrook (Post 1718402)
From my current list:

Download Thread
Email Client
Hacks Database
Karma for Posting in Special Threads
Top Stats (a.k.a. Server Stats... without using Debug Mode. Though I guess some of this gets covered in the ACP)
Triple Triad
Age Limit for specific forums
Anonymous Poster / Anonymous Moderator
HTTP Authentication for Non-Forum Pages
Rap Battle System

There's no need for most of these hacks to be added to the core, but I couldn't find any versions for newer vB versions. (Well, I didn't exactly look hard, I mainly used the Similar Threads feature to determine whether it's worth archiving or not.)

The real question, though, is how many hacks that are available in the 3.0.x section are now paid products. The two that spring to mind are:

RPG System
Almost any type of elaborate SEO Plugin

Rap Battle System? I must have missed that one. I always just used threads. I can say that the Age Limit thing can be handled by vB core if you know how to work usergroups, and Triple Triad still continues to be updated. I think we'll see an RPG in the near future. Then there's TfSEO 2.

Ryan Ashbrook 01-20-2009 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Digital Jedi (Post 1718634)
Rap Battle System? I must have missed that one. I always just used threads. I can say that the Age Limit thing can be handled by vB core if you know how to work usergroups, and Triple Triad still continues to be updated. I think we'll see an RPG in the near future. Then there's TfSEO 2.

Rap Battle System is in the Beta Modifications forum.

I didn't know Triple Triad was still updated, I know I've looked for it previously too.

There was RPG Inferno but Inferno Technologies seems to have dropped off the face of the Earth.

I forgot about TfSEO.

Zachariah 01-29-2009 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nighteyes (Post 1713392)
But this site has a whole history of yanking code and making life difficult for some of us. So I'm not surprised. :)

You could go to PHPBB

zirzirnet 10-04-2009 03:42 AM

3.0 does not use products .. all other versions after that use products .. so i think they not gonna remove mods after 3.0

excited abt 4.0


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:24 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by vBS
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

X vBulletin 3.8.12 by vBS Debug Information
  • Page Generation 0.01345 seconds
  • Memory Usage 1,829KB
  • Queries Executed 10 (?)
More Information
Template Usage:
  • (1)ad_footer_end
  • (1)ad_footer_start
  • (1)ad_header_end
  • (1)ad_header_logo
  • (1)ad_navbar_below
  • (14)bbcode_quote_printable
  • (1)footer
  • (1)gobutton
  • (1)header
  • (1)headinclude
  • (6)option
  • (1)pagenav
  • (1)pagenav_curpage
  • (1)pagenav_pagelink
  • (1)post_thanks_navbar_search
  • (1)printthread
  • (40)printthreadbit
  • (1)spacer_close
  • (1)spacer_open 

Phrase Groups Available:
  • global
  • postbit
  • showthread
Included Files:
  • ./printthread.php
  • ./global.php
  • ./includes/init.php
  • ./includes/class_core.php
  • ./includes/config.php
  • ./includes/functions.php
  • ./includes/class_hook.php
  • ./includes/modsystem_functions.php
  • ./includes/class_bbcode_alt.php
  • ./includes/class_bbcode.php
  • ./includes/functions_bigthree.php 

Hooks Called:
  • init_startup
  • init_startup_session_setup_start
  • init_startup_session_setup_complete
  • cache_permissions
  • fetch_threadinfo_query
  • fetch_threadinfo
  • fetch_foruminfo
  • style_fetch
  • cache_templates
  • global_start
  • parse_templates
  • global_setup_complete
  • printthread_start
  • pagenav_page
  • pagenav_complete
  • bbcode_fetch_tags
  • bbcode_create
  • bbcode_parse_start
  • bbcode_parse_complete_precache
  • bbcode_parse_complete
  • printthread_post
  • printthread_complete