![]() |
vBulletin 3.8 - worst for spam.
I have been inundated with spammers since uploading vBulletin 3.8 and it's disappointing there's no tools to combat it. I have yet to find a mod to prevent it either. Any tips?
|
I had this issue when I updated aswell, and I tried 99% of the things that people told me to do.
In the end I Just went back to 3.7 |
try either question and answer or recapcha in human verification options. I use recapcha and get no spam whatsoever.
That said, I'm still on 3.7 |
Quote:
|
Why would upgrading to 3.8 have anything to do with having more spammers? Aside from the fact that there are more spam prevention tools in 3.8, the methods for preventing spam are the same as before. There's no special vulnerability that's being exploited in 3.8 that isn't in 3.7. Either they're being stopped at registration or they're not.
|
I haven't had one single spammer & I'm using 3.8 so I doubt it's the software.
|
Quote:
|
Have you tried "NoSpam!"? It seems to have all but solved the problem for mass bot registration.
|
Quote:
|
Make sure your questions are not math questions or questions that say "type the word [word] in the box" or "are you a human?". Come up with simple, but impossible for bots to guess questions.
You can use HTML with no spam, so I use small images and ask brain dead questions about them. Like "(Fill in the blank) This is a picture of Super___." and then have a picture of Superman, or "What kind of animal is this?" and then have a picture of a dog. Just make sure you don't name the picture anything remotely close to what the answer is. Also remember that humans can register bots and then send them o'spammin', or bots could have registered months ago and don't start spamming until after you've installed precautions. |
Thanks for the tips. That sounds like a good idea.
Quote:
|
Probably bots registered by their owners. Or they got through the type of questions I mentioned above that are too easy for bots to be programmed to guess, if you happen to have any. (i.e. Are you a human?) Give the hardcore questions I mentioned a try and take a no tolerance policy towards spam if you don't already and delete, not ban, users who clearly appear to be bots.
|
The differences in registration/human verification in vBulletin 3.7 vs. 3.8 is almost nil. I doubt the influx of spammers has anything to do with the upgrade.
|
Quote:
Human spammers are just a fact of life. But VB has LOTS of tools to fight spam bots. My forum gets one or two spammers a month. |
Quote:
|
i thought it was only me i've had mad spam now
|
Quote:
I politely disagree on the ReCapthca statement. |
Quote:
http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/10/02/1415205 Now, I know they've made some improvements, but it's still much harder for a bot to guess random questions like, What color is this image? rather then decode the text from images it's been programed to decode. |
Quote:
There is not a single mention of ReCAPTCHA in the article you linked to. Your reply is "ReCAPTCHA was cracked by the Xrummer spammers." and a linked article. And the article you linked to offers NO supporting evidence that ReCAPTCHA has been cracked. I even searched the page (using firefox search feature) and there is not a single mention of ReCAPTCHA in the article you linked to. Why would you link to an article claiming it mentioned ReCaptcha when in fact it does not? There is a difference between captcha and ReCaptcha. If you have proof supporting that ReCaptcha (not captcha) has been cracked, please post a link. But make sure that the article does in fact mention ReCaptcha. |
The images from reCAPTCHA are images that haven't been able to be deciphered by computers with OCR. It relies on users submissions. The first image has a known answer (the "control" word), while the second does not. A known answer is one that was a "second image" but X users had the same answer, and it is assumed correct, and "promoted".
|
I tend to find recaptcha to be less accurate.
It allows a certain fudge factor when entering words with similar looking letters. If you try, you can purposely enter two wrong words and it will verify, as long as the letters you entered look similar. Try replacing e with o and r with n etc. |
Agreed Bellardia,
The best spam prevention i've seen is using the built in akismet filters and the human verification question and answer methods. I've used that setup on numerous forums to stop automated spam dead in its tracks |
Quote:
Either way, what are you disagreeing with me with? We had a huge number of discussion here in October when several people's boards were suddenly getting deluged with spam. Several people pointing out ReCAPTCHA's flaws. So I'm not sure if you're disagreeing with that, or disagreeing with my point that security questions are much harder for bots to guess. |
Quote:
I disagree with your statement - Quote:
|
Quote:
|
It's stopped it on mine too. I'm going by the reports of many other members who have reported it being circumvented.
|
Just to let you know I run a board with reCAPTCHA, and I've been spammed by Xrummer 5.
I have seen a method to trick it thinking it's failed to register so I will try this method. |
I had about 100 spam posts everyday once I switched to 3.8.0. I used the email verification thing, and now I'm just watching the spam users register, and my board statistics go up, but them not being able to post. :)
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:42 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by vBS
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
X vBulletin 3.8.12 by vBS Debug Information | |
---|---|
|
|
![]() |
|
Template Usage:
Phrase Groups Available:
|
Included Files:
Hooks Called:
|