damnit mine isnt working either, the image limits can be bigger than what i specified. im done farting with it for tonight....

how can i uninstall this hack?

i get this error after remove this mode
### UPDATE QUERY GENERATED BY fetch_query_sql() ###
`title` = 'members',
`description` = '',
`usertitle` = '',
`opentag` = '<FONT color=\"996633\">',
`closetag` = '</FONT>',
`passwordexpires` = '0',
`passwordhistory` = '0',
`ispublicgroup` = '0',
`canoverride` = '0',
`custompermissions` = '0',
`maxsiglines` = '',
`maxsigfontsize` = '',
`maxsigimgsize` = '',
`maxsigimgwidth` = '',
`maxsigimgheight` = '',
`maxsigimages` = '',
`sigforbiddencodes` = '',
`forumpermissions` = '782591',
`attachlimit` = '5000000',
`pmquota` = '50',
`pmpermissions` = '0',
`pmsendmax` = '2',
`calendarpermissions` = '33',
`wolpermissions` = '1',
`adminpermissions` = '0',
`genericpermissions` = '203964103',
`genericoptions` = '12',
`profilepicmaxwidth` = '100',
`profilepicmaxheight` = '100',
`profilepicmaxsize` = '25000',
`avatarmaxwidth` = '50',
`avatarmaxheight` = '50',
`avatarmaxsize` = '20000'
WHERE usergroupid=14;

MySQL Error : Unknown column 'maxsiglines' in 'field list'
Error Number : 1054

Uninstall it correctly.

How????

Its not working for me. I am using vb v3.5.2


The signature font still shows the same size?

anyone managed to make it work under 3.5.2?

I'm running vb 3.5.2. I test for myself and see that I can't use the codes in banned list. But still, there are members who are able to put banned codes in their signature? Really have no idea. It is a bug?

Thanks!

Everything installed nicely, but it does not function while using 3.5.2. Do you have a fix for this, or am I doing something wrong. It appears others are having the same issue.

I really like what you did with this hack, and I am real anxious to get this working properly.

Thanks in advance :)

Edited: Fixed my own problem. Deleted it, reinstalled it, and now it works on my 3.5.2 board. Nice hack and thanks a bunch for all your hard work. :)

Awesome hack, installed!

Any chance future versions could detect and deny animated GIFs?

Is this not a usergroup option now?

It is for avatars, but not for sig images, afaik.

Not entirely sure what's happening. I reset the sigs for everyone, set the sig limits to 550x250 and 65k, and still, a user has a 686x200 235k image in PNG format in his sig. What gives?

Edit: It seems like this is a problem with other file formats as well. The host is always photobucket. Guess there is a problem with that host?

Edit2: Oh man, this really irks me. I deleted all the sigs and had people redo them. Now it turns out that this only works for some, and not for others, which basically defeats the purpose. I mean if I have to manually edit sigs and send PMs to those who have oversized sigs, then there was really no point for me to put the burden of redoing sigs on all users. I realize this is not a bug in the extension. I just hope that my experience will serve others so that they will consider whether to delete everyones sig or not.

im running it on 3.5.2 and im set the size for regular users now it dont seem to be affecting curent signs should it?

I dont' understand why people say this sort of thing. Sig Width and height is very practical. It's no different than avatar width and height. If you don't put limits on it, people will use a half dozen images and some are just huge.

Yes, I understand that you can choose to turn sigs off if you don't want to view them, but why not have the option of setting a dimension and filesize limit? There are still people on dialup of which some I know get pretty irked having to wait for some a-hole's obnoxious sig to download.


JM2CW

No, read the earlier pages of this thread, current sigs are not affected.
Neither are new sigs in many cases when you allow external links.

3.5.3 user here.

Restricting sig limits is not working.

Someone has hard tested this on 3.5.3?

mmm but seems workin on 3.5.2 and doesnt work on 3.5.3

Yes, unfortunately it doesn't work on 3.5.3. We need an update please!

Fixed - Open bitfields_siglimits.xml change
To
At least it works on mine now and i run 3.5.3

I don't see any reason why it should not work on 3.5.3

It works fine in 3.5.3 for me.

Maybe if it does not work, then you will need to re-upload all the files and add the product again and the set the usergroup permissios (basically a re-install)

Installed and working on 3.5.3

I thought i'd wait until i'd had this installed a few days, so that my users and moderators could get used to it and so I could judge how well it works for me.

I love it, you've saved me a load of work. :)

My moderators like it, but say it's doing them out of a job.

My users hate it though, they're complaining that they can't sneak in a banner a few K over the limit or a few pixels over the limit, hoping nobody would notice. Hehehe... Jobs a good'un... :D

Thanks for this hack!

*klicks install*

No way. Tested on vb 3.5.3 and with IMG users can make signatures with any restriction.
Maybe something i did not set?

Either your permissions are not set correctly or allow_url_fopen is false

where i see the allow_url ?

Edit to add:

i set the limit in usergroup registered
only there. there's something else i have to modify?

I set:
Signature Image(s) Maximum Width (pixels) 10
Signature Image(s) Maximum Height (pixels) 10

and i still see my signature with an image of w 500 h 100

When importing the product-siglimits.xml, it shows "XML error: at line 277 not well-formed (invalid token)"

I am using a chinese version vbb 3.53, what should this error be?

yet another awesome work from KirbyDe;)
Installed on 3.5.3 and all options work fine unless Link to Exnternal Websites
anyways ;) /me Clicks Install

I installed this hack long time ago but I wasn't using it on my site. Finally today I started to use it along with some modifications of my own to allow users to display/hide the images on the signature.

This hack is great!

How difficult is to use the "link to external sites" feature also in images?... I mean, to restrict images only to the domains specified in the Internal URL field.

Is that possible?

I'm still having this issue.

Turns out I was experiencing this problem as I was testing it in the admin usergroup. I would suggest adding that this hack is exempt for admins.

Admins are not exempt.
If permissions don't show up in the rules box, then there are no limits.

my version is 3.5.3 and it's working will , but there is a something

if a member already using an Forbidden BBCode , the plugin should disable this right ?

cause the effect is only for the coming actions not the previous actions

thnx for the plugin :)

I installed this and edited the usergroup permissions set max image width to 400 and it still lets me use big images. what did I do wrong? i uploaded bitfield_siglimits.xml to forum/includes/xml and installed product-siglimits.xml as a product. did i miss something? the directions in the text file are very brief for a newb like me. please help im sick of ultra wide sigs messing up the design


cheers for a great idea :)

p.s. im using 3.5.3

i know im probably jus being n00b and retardy but please help me :)

I've set the limits. Im looking at them right now.