Quote:
Originally posted by TECK
Stefan, from my experience with search engines (and I did searched a lot), indexes will drop your site for the following reasons:
1. no unique meta tags for each page (most important)
2. popups or any other external links, that direct your crawler outside the site
3. deprecated html code
Now, others will argue with me and tell me: "heh my archive is listed..."
Let me know for how long. I guarantee you that by the end of the month your links are dropped.
The best way to test your links is to go to Google and search for:
site:yoursite.com archive
So, I strongly recommend you Stefan to update your code, related to those issues I mentioned above, orelse the archive pages will NOT be indexed.
vBulletin.org decided to install my archive because of "no. 1 reason", listed above.
I know that "some" people (same who rated 1 my archive) will consider this as "spam" or "advertising" my own code... believe what you want, I simply try to help.
Feel free to read more here to see that what I say is true:
http://www.searchengineforums.com/
|
I'm not going to bother trying to change your mind anymore, but you are wrong TECK and I will prove that to you. Google doesn't kick because of lack of unique meta tags. That is the biggest joke i've ever heard. And #2 is even more rediculous. Guess what, I use 3 popups on my archive and an exit window and I get over 7,000 uniques a day from google, just from this archive. Please don't spread these kind of remarks around, you are misunderstanding how google works. If you don't believe me, then post what you just posted below at SearchEngineForums (which you seem to preach) and they will tell you that you are wrong also. Google doesn't even open javascript files, so how would they know it contains a popup window? As far as #3 goes, there is no proof that google drops old pages that haven't been updated, but i'm sure that they will at some time. That is irrelevant anyways.
You seem to doubt the stuff I say teck, and i'm not too sure why. I've been working on search engines for over 2 years and i've been hired by some of Canada's top companies to search engine optimize their sites for them. My archive isn't as pretty as yours, but it works and I prefer it over yours for a few reasons. First off, the archive is meant for one purpous... to get your posts spidered, not to have users surf on! My archive is dull and has a nice big link pointing to the original thread. Yes, your archive is nice... so nice that most people will probably end up surfing it and never actually visiting the real forum and signing up. This isn't what I want, I want users to get to my forum.
As far as multiple pages, why does it matter? Listen. No one is going to be visiting the actual "index" of threads, only google. That is fine though, because each month it will continue to spider your site, so all your new threads will get added. I know what I am talking about, my forums have 1200+ threads and I continue to get 3000 pages added to google monthly. I have 5500 pages with them now and 3 months ago I had only about 10. Now, people coming from google will go directly to the post, so they wont have to see "50,000 threads" as you so called it. However, you are right, some larger forums that have forums with 10,000 or more threads in a single forums should not use my hack, they should use yours, otherwise alot of their current threads wouldn't get spidered.
As far as what you are saying being true, teck... man... you need some serious lessons. I don't know what threads you were reading over at searchengineforums, but I imagine you chose to read only the ones that would confirm your own opinions. I also urge anyone here to go surf around searchengineforums and you will see that my hack isn't "the devil" that teck makes it out to be. Is teck's hack better than mine? If you want a flashy archive and want your visitors surfing your archive (rather than your forum) then I suggest you go with his. I also suggest you use his if you have an overly large forum with several tens of thousands of threads. But for all the smaller forums out there, I guarentee you will get better results with my hack than teck's. Everything in mine is optimized, where as teck's archive has many small things that will hurt him in the search engine. For instance, on posts in your archive teck... you list the title of the forum first, then the title of the thread. Don't you know that the title is the most important part in google? And google only counts the first 59 characters of the title. anything after that is wasted space. So by putting the title first, you are wasting alot of characters.
There are many other small thinggs like that in teck's archive, but he can figure them out for himself. The bottom line is though, that my forum is recieving 7,000 unique hits from google per day. If you want to see proof, then go to my stats tracker,
http://extremetracking.com/open?login=bforums - The proof is in the pudding. So teck, where are your results? Is your archive bringing you over 7,000 uniques a day from google?
- SkuZZy