Precisely the same problem.

Doable... but then it's more intensive and I personally wouldn't want have added something intensive to every page.

yo,yo. Nice idea, but why dont improve the code itself. If i watch the code of templates there is about 30% to save i think. Nobody needs things like

cellpadding="0" if cellpadding=0 do the same; for a lot of other parts it goes the same ...

Not exactly true: cellpadding=0 is not valid, cellpadding='0' and cellpadding="0" are the same, but cellpadding=0 is not...

Example, <img src=image name.jpg alt=an image on my webpage border=0> << very bad...

Yup, because for it to be XHTML valid, all attributes MUST be quoted regardless of datatype of value (i.e. even if it is a number, or a string without spaces, it still needs quoting).

And of course, feel free to modify all of your code, and then you will see why vBulletin left some pieces of styling and spacing within HTML and not CSS... compatibility for CSS is still shakey for those not using the very latest browsers (still shakey for some that are using the latest browsers).

Am I missing something, as you've mentioned both lite and extreme versions? I only see one at the beginning of the thread, is this the lite version? I've probably missed something and looked like a fool, lol :p

Anybody??? Am I doomed to suffer from slow loading times and bloated bandwidth usage forever. Noooooooo

Use the version in post 65. :)

what exactly does that do though in comparison to the other one?

Which other one ?

That is basically the final version that people came up with - it uses the more agressive stripping except for the listed scripts, where it uses the 'lite' version.

Kick a$$!!!!!!
great hack =)