Originally Posted by Ellendway (Post 2205034)

Awesome update nhawk!!! Thanks so much. I'll send donate if few days.

Anyway, I've got questions how to fix two things.

1) If I'll use URL address in application form, in topic is this URL "dead".
2) Multi-Line Text is bugged???

I hope the screenshot of my screen will help you.

Originally Posted by Ellendway (Post 2205109)

Thanks for quick fix. It's working good now.

If you will have little more time, you can do it (with links), but no rush :)

Thanks again!

Originally Posted by nhawk (Post 2204626)

That is exactly what the 'Yes/No' option does, it gives the either/or option.

I'll have to think about it, but personally I think combining the two could end up with strange results.

Originally Posted by nhawk (Post 2205168)

It's in today's release on a per-position basis. So, it can be enabled on a position by position basis. Only SINGLE LINE text answers will be parsed for URLS.

Originally Posted by Alan_SP (Post 2205170)

As I said, you're really fast. :up:

Though I would also make multi line answers parsed if it is possible. As I understand we have option if we want links parsed or not, so why not have them parsed everywhere? Please...

Originally Posted by nhawk (Post 2204973)

You asked this same question about one of my other mods. The answer is not any different..

At this point I can't say if I will or won't port any of my mods to 3.8.7.

None of the sites I service run 3.x.x any more and my time is spent servicing 4.x.x sites and mods.

Originally Posted by Alan_SP (Post 2205169)

I want to use users first line answer as variable, that I have ability to add some text to it if I want/need it. That I be able to make such thread names:

User's first answer is: {1}

Or if we could use both I could have:

{1}'s first answer is: {2}

Of course, it doesn't really need to be {1}, it could be also {2}, whatever variable number it is. And yes, I am aware that this could give strange results, but I'm the one who's creating threads names and this is something I do think about.

Now as I understand I can use only first answer as it is, without adding any of my text to it. It is good, but having it as variable would be better in my opinion. I really don't know is it possible, but I already miss it.



Yes, I really want links parsed. For example, when user's apply for moderator I want to ask him for links of threads he started, or he thinks he wrote good posts, as this is something relevant in my opinion what makes good moderator. In that case, having live links is commodity. I now just edit his first post without actually editing anything (links after that become live).

Having ability to choose live or dead links is fine with me, I'm always for having more control than less. :)

Also, I noticed you didn't phrased Start Application button, it's "hard coded" in template. Please, can you phrase it. The button to use when user chooses which application to fill out.

And one new suggestion. Can you make that filled out applications create new posts in already existing thread? Sometimes I'd like to use both options (you can say I like to archive applications in certain thread, to have all of them in one place), and sometimes I'd like only to add new posts to already existing thread.

Of course, I think this to be an addition to creating new threads, not instead of it, just like I can send PM or email too.