vb.org Archive

vb.org Archive (https://vborg.vbsupport.ru/index.php)
-   Community Lounge (https://vborg.vbsupport.ru/forumdisplay.php?f=13)
-   -   Off topic Stuff from Mentor Thread - and discussion of staying on topic (https://vborg.vbsupport.ru/showthread.php?t=118147)

Roms 06-09-2006 11:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hotwheels
I am by no mean's a coder, and i don't pretend to be. One thing i would try to respect would be a Coder's room. If you have 10 coder's discussing a problem with hook's or php placement, it is better in my opinion to let the coder's discuss in some sort of privacy what the answer may be. Verse's having someone like myself, throw in my nonknowing opinion.
Basically there are area's within vbulletin.org where you can ask for help on code or working with hack's. But as a way to develop code, they need a place that has just a bit of privacy. If we keep pushing the issue's like this, pretty soon, we won't get any hacks. They will all cost money, instead of being able to just come here and down load something......

I honestly can't see that you "respect" anything as you say you do. Why, well anyone that takes someone elses hard work (ie: my heavymetal style) and replaces the "designed by:" with their name instead of the original authors doesn't have an ounce of respect in my book.

smacklan 06-09-2006 11:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Infantrymen
I honestly can't see that you "respect" anything as you say you do. Why, well anyone that takes someone elses hard work (ie: my heavymetal style) and replaces the "designed by:" with their name instead of the original authors doesn't have an ounce of respect in my book.

ouch!

Freesteyelz 06-09-2006 11:27 PM

Let's stay off-topic people! :lick:

tgreer 06-09-2006 11:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hotwheels
I am by no mean's a coder, and i don't pretend to be. One thing i would try to respect would be a Coder's room. If you have 10 coder's discussing a problem with hook's or php placement, it is better in my opinion to let the coder's discuss in some sort of privacy what the answer may be. Verse's having someone like myself, throw in my nonknowing opinion.
Basically there are area's within vbulletin.org where you can ask for help on code or working with hack's. But as a way to develop code, they need a place that has just a bit of privacy. If we keep pushing the issue's like this, pretty soon, we won't get any hacks. They will all cost money, instead of being able to just come here and down load something......

Your thoughts are shared by many... but that wasn't an answer to my question, which essentially boils down to: if you ran this site for Jelsoft, how would YOU moderate it? Or put another way, should this site be run with a strict moderation policy, or a relaxed one?

I vote "strict", and that includes: Keep threads on topic. Delete offensive posts. No profanity (this is a public forum, people of all ages and backgrounds use it, which is an argument for more discretion, not less, in our word choices). Humor and casual conversation in a Lounge area. Site Feedback should only be responded to by staff... no bandwagon runaway threads or member debates, etc.

A "relaxed" policy would be the no-holds barred, post anything anywhere, staff gets in there and mixes it up with the members, kind of style we have now.

hotwheels 06-09-2006 11:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Infantrymen
I honestly can't see that you "respect" anything as you say you do. Why, well anyone that takes someone elses hard work (ie: my heavymetal style) and replaces the "designed by:" with their name instead of the original authors doesn't have an ounce of respect in my book.

I didn't mean for that to happen. I tried to shut off the link and it messed up the screen. I by no mean's want to take credit for anyone else's work, and i find your style's to be simply awesome. I apologize for having my site link in that spot, i just didn't know how to not have a hot link at the bottom of the page. I will change the name back though........seriously, all i was trying to do was loose the hot link in the footer.. I am very sorry man....... Doug (hotwheels)

Quote:

Originally Posted by tgreer
Humor and casual conversation in a Lounge area. Site Feedback should only be responded to by staff... no bandwagon runaway threads or member debates, etc.

I follow you now........and you are right, this topic has nothing to do with site feedback.....and should be in the lounge area.....

Roms 06-09-2006 11:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hotwheels
I didn't mean for that to happen. I tried to shut off the link and it messed up the screen. I by no mean's want to take credit for anyone else's work, and i find your style's to be simply awesome. I apologize for having my site link in that spot, i just didn't know how to not have a hot link at the bottom of the page. I will change the name back though........seriously, all i was trying to do was loose the hot link in the footer.. I am very sorry man....... Doug (hotwheels)

Apology accepted, we're good. ;)

hotwheels 06-09-2006 11:59 PM

I changed it back to Infantrymen too...........Like i say, i got in deeper then i anticipated when i tryed to do some work on the footer area, and not necessarily the hot link, but i tried do some stuff with the footer navbar and couldn't figure out how to make it right. If you go to my site and look at the bottom of the main style (legacy), you will see 3 added link's in the footer bar (spiders, modstats, and files upload center)......I was able to get the links to work correctly, but could never get them to blend into the navbar, if that make's sense. As i was doing that, i tryed to get these on all the style's so that i could quick link to these area's.....In the process, i made error's to several other style's too, and tryed my best to make thing's look right. As such, i was only able to get file upload's up on your style....then i stopped out of frustration cause i couldn't get the bar to look the same......if that make's sense......

anyways, thanks for accepting my apology.........And i seriously want you to know, out of all the style's on my site, the heavy metal version is the best.....simply awesome work.... doug

Roms 06-10-2006 12:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hotwheels
I changed it back to Infantrymen too...........Like i say, i got in deeper then i anticipated when i tryed to do some work on the footer area, and not necessarily the hot link, but i tried do some stuff with the footer navbar and couldn't figure out how to make it right. If you go to my site and look at the bottom of the main style (legacy), you will see 3 added link's in the footer bar (spiders, modstats, and files upload center)......I was able to get the links to work correctly, but could never get them to blend into the navbar, if that make's sense. As i was doing that, i tryed to get these on all the style's so that i could quick link to these area's.....In the process, i made error's to several other style's too, and tryed my best to make thing's look right. As such, i was only able to get file upload's up on your style....then i stopped out of frustration cause i couldn't get the bar to look the same......if that make's sense......

anyways, thanks for accepting my apology.........And i seriously want you to know, out of all the style's on my site, the heavy metal version is the best.....simply awesome work.... doug

I understand, sorry to hear that. It takes a big man to reply as you did and you've really earned my respect. I would be more than willing to modify the footer to work correctly for you on your site. If you post your footer code in this thread and give me a description of how it's supposed to be I'll fix it for you. :) (we can continue our conversation in that thread if needed....)

Take care,
Roms

hotwheels 06-10-2006 12:10 AM

Right on man, i appreciate it..........I will get everything and post it up......thanks, doug

Gio~Logist 06-10-2006 12:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tgreer
Please stay on-topic :). The topic of this thread is, is it okay to go off-topic? My point of view is, not in a professional, technical resource forum. For example, imagine a site administrator who is wondering if she should do anything about off-topic posts, comes here, and sees this thread? How would your quoted post benefit her? Instead of seeing a quality discussion on the topic, she'd have to wade through "lol" and childish non-sequitor insults.

Quote:

Originally Posted by tgreer
I'm not picking the topics, Lottis... you can see the topic by looking at the title of the thread. This one is "...discussion of staying on topic". The "mentor" discussion is a different thread. If you, I, or anyone else wants to talk about something else, we start another thread. I'm not being dogmatic, that's just how forums work.

Ok, I'm really very curious. Try, if you can, to forget any impression you may have formed about me... respond to what I'm saying, not that it's me saying it:

Does anyone see the difference between an official, corporate, technical resource site, and a general-purpose (or even niche) site that primarily exists as a self-contained community? If not - then we'll never see eye-to-eye. If so, though:

Don't you think that this site, owned by a software vendor, and used by that vendor as their official site for product customization, needs to have perhaps a different standard, in terms of thread moderation, than, as an example, a gaming clan site? A car fan forum? A general-purpose discussion group?

I use the word "professional" a lot, and I use it mainly as an antonym to "amateur". Note, I'm placing no value judgments on either term. I'm an amateur at lots of things which I enjoy immensely: publishing haibun, writing for school textbooks, playing guitar. I'm not insulted when someone calls me an amateur at any of those things, and I'm not insulting anyone who runs an amateur forum.

I'm a professional, though, at programming, and at site administration/moderation, and have been for decades (I ran some very high-traffic Compuserve Forums, pre-internet). One of the tools I use in my profession is vBulletin. When I visit either of their sites, I expect professional-level help and support for the software I've purchased.

In my opinion, part of the problem with .org is that it is not professional-grade. It's run more like a gaming clan for vb hacks. I think that needs to change, and that part of the change from an amateur hacker club to a professional software support forum, is better thread moderation.

How you run your site really isn't relevant to how this site should be run, is it?

You say that you are a professional programmer (as i may say so if someone asks, as well as a professional designer). However, may i ask what makes this official? Nothing, it's based on our experience and skill. Others can actually probably disagree with us. The same way others can disagree with this not being a professional site. May i ask what officially made this one? The fact that jelsoft owns it just means that they pay for the bills and come here to manage from time to time. In the end, it's run by unpaid volunteers.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Ohiosweetheart
T... this is not a professionally run site sweetie. It's a site run by volunteers, for people to offer modifications to vB and for others to come to, to get those modifications. While doing so, people "hang out", enjoy each other, talk about their sites, compare notes, pick up ideas, make friends, joke and kid around, etc.
.Org never was, isn't, and never will be, a professional site, that I can see. And truthfully, that's ok with me, and most others.

Agreed.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boofo
No I won't. This is the offtopic thread that was split, can't you read? You don't need both threads for your rants. Please do your whining somewhere else.

And this is why i love Boofo. Agreed.


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by vBS
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

X vBulletin 3.8.12 by vBS Debug Information
  • Page Generation 0.01174 seconds
  • Memory Usage 1,785KB
  • Queries Executed 10 (?)
More Information
Template Usage:
  • (1)ad_footer_end
  • (1)ad_footer_start
  • (1)ad_header_end
  • (1)ad_header_logo
  • (1)ad_navbar_below
  • (11)bbcode_quote_printable
  • (1)footer
  • (1)gobutton
  • (1)header
  • (1)headinclude
  • (6)option
  • (1)pagenav
  • (1)pagenav_curpage
  • (3)pagenav_pagelink
  • (1)post_thanks_navbar_search
  • (1)printthread
  • (10)printthreadbit
  • (1)spacer_close
  • (1)spacer_open 

Phrase Groups Available:
  • global
  • postbit
  • showthread
Included Files:
  • ./printthread.php
  • ./global.php
  • ./includes/init.php
  • ./includes/class_core.php
  • ./includes/config.php
  • ./includes/functions.php
  • ./includes/class_hook.php
  • ./includes/modsystem_functions.php
  • ./includes/class_bbcode_alt.php
  • ./includes/class_bbcode.php
  • ./includes/functions_bigthree.php 

Hooks Called:
  • init_startup
  • init_startup_session_setup_start
  • init_startup_session_setup_complete
  • cache_permissions
  • fetch_threadinfo_query
  • fetch_threadinfo
  • fetch_foruminfo
  • style_fetch
  • cache_templates
  • global_start
  • parse_templates
  • global_setup_complete
  • printthread_start
  • pagenav_page
  • pagenav_complete
  • bbcode_fetch_tags
  • bbcode_create
  • bbcode_parse_start
  • bbcode_parse_complete_precache
  • bbcode_parse_complete
  • printthread_post
  • printthread_complete