It was my version of Erwin's microstats. I never released it because it was based it on his code.

Taking into account the slow speed of loading of vb3 pages, I can expect this to worsen in 3.5... But yeah, seeing the AJAX technology, I was like "woah! wtf is that?".. lol.

vB3's pages don't load slowly for me - Its about as fast as vB2 ever was :ermm:

Satan

vB3 was faster for me, less nested tables, less overall code in the page, external css file support. 10x faster, rendering times should be down as well

Well on the concept of OOP you would think that it would be faster. Also with the ability to reload content without refreshing is going to be or at least appear faster to the end user.

"less" code in the page doesn't mean anything.. they're just stored eleswhere for retrival...

vb3 is slower than vb2 in terms of page rendering.. there is hardly any JS code in vb2 whereas vb3 is bloated with JS which tend to lag browsers and cause delays. the PHP code might be more "optimized" in vb3, but it doesn't mean its any faster than vb2 when it comes to page rendering.

i dont think i have plans on upgrading to vb3.5. just thinking about all the bloated "AJAX" JS code it will have makes me look the other way. I took vb3 and basically rewrote and eliminated almost all the excessive JS code.

You know there is a switch, that when you flip, it turns off the js ;)

Actually, vB3 overall, bboth on php render time and browser render time, the stock skin is faster. (assuming optmial conditionals for connections etc)

I'd love to see these benchmarks, as I don't believe it for a second ;)

you mean theirs actual stats, groovy

[high]* sabret00the eagerly awaits.[/high]

Also with vb 3 theres more conflicts with otehr browsers .... Maybe could be cleared up with 3.5.