I think we all understand this, however if you look back a page you'll see that someone has pretty much successfully ported this modification into 4.0.X with few issues and the only thing stopping them releasing it is questions over ownership of the code. This is why some of us are extra antsy about it's release as a 4.0.X mod..

Frustrating indeed!

Yeah what he said!! ;)

Can you tell us what you changed so we can do it ourselves? Kind of like a fix for his mod, I have seen that done before. So you will be given the credit for fixing his code for vb4.

No not really there was to many changes I do not even remember what I changed at this point. There would be no way for me to even write directions as there was a bit of code changes some little things some bigger things. I replaced whole templates.

Sorry I couldn't be more helpful.

You know, there's nothing wrong with posting just the modified files in THIS thread, as long as the coder hasn't said otherwise.

It is modified files and templates.

Actually, you may not unless the developer says it's OK. Developers don't like people modifying their code and redistributing it without their permission.

In this case probably close to 90% of the code is stock VB 3.8 code. Most of the custom code is with the templates which BBR-APBT had to rewrite for VB 4, the rest of the "custom" code is SQL queries which I wouldnt classify a SQL query as "custom".

If BBR-APBT were to take his mod, strip out all the VB stock code and then do a 'diff' to Abes code I'm sure only a few lines would match

just my 2cents

I guess that?s right too :)

Can I suggest that the "supported" checkmark is removed if the developer is not actually supporting the product?