Digital Jedi |
08-25-2008 02:18 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shelley_c
(Post 1606110)
To be fair Danny, I don't think it's fair play when the dedicated member (Boofo) in question isn't here to defend himself as being branded as arrogant (note!! the same member) who had dedicated his time when vborg needed him (the same person you and co) worked along side. Makes me laugh how you can discriminate such a valued member of the community because things went pear shaped but he wasn't so arrogant when he donated his time to help in support and submitted his modifications.
I'm sure the thread will be closed but just a note that the unprofessional statement from you should be brought into pm with boofo.
|
I believe that 90% of all conflicts on forums are a result of miscommunication. Case in point:
1. Jase2 says Boofo won't come back because of the staff's arrogant tone.
2. Danny asks the rhetorical question of how can the staff be considered arrogant, when the staff has donated their time to helping boofo (and everyone) with code related questions.
3. Shelly says, she doesn't think it's fair to call Boofo arrogant when he's not around. :confused:
I didn't get to communicate much with Boofo before he left, but I liked him well enough. I did do a lot of reading of old posts on this forum, and Boofo did seem to be a little confrontational at times. But most of them, like most confrontations, are due to breakdowns in communication. Either someone reads someone else's post wrong, or we don't type our post out clearly enough to convey the mood behind it. Though, I have to say, the ladder is the most difficult to perfect. Nine times out of ten, people are going to imbue a post with whatever perception they have of that person when reading it. And if the post is a dissenting view, then it's even more likely to be read with a hostile tone, even if one was never intended.
|