vb.org Archive

vb.org Archive (https://vborg.vbsupport.ru/index.php)
-   vBulletin.org Site Feedback (https://vborg.vbsupport.ru/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   Hacks should be released in ONE ZIP file please (https://vborg.vbsupport.ru/showthread.php?t=92234)

Chris M 07-12-2005 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tamarian
For the same reasons I pointed out in the other 2 threads. The pattern now seems to go like this:

Staff decides to do something (usually disabling a stock vB feature, or removing a a hack), then they just do it. Then feedback comes in, then an announcement is posted after the fact saying things will be done this way from now on. If members don't like, 3 things will happen: One mod will say "read the post!", the other will say "We have reasons we cannot tell you" or "what do you really need that for?", and the third will say "We appreciate your opinion, and we may revisit the issue after we upgrade to 3.5"

As for saving Jelsoft bandwidth, despite it being already compressed with Gzip, let me say this: The disk space and bandwidth was initially paid by the founders of the forum, and there are many here who won't mind hosting it. Jelsoft picked it up in order ensure the licensing. Now that it has it and can check the licensing, now it complains about the monthly cost to run it? They can't have it both ways, either let soemoneelse run it and pay for it, or if they prefer to host it to ensure licensing, then they need to pay.

The more they increase control, and decide in the dark about all these issues, and we're just told to do it and "try to understand" without any obvious reason, the more it will driver down the quality of the work people are willing to share.

I know many members don't understand this, for they probably didn't see this pattern, and it only effects developers, but they might be next. They'll be equally outraged if they needed to fill things, or do certain things to download each hack, and being told they have to do it for "undiclosed reasons".

I'm sure you guys mean well, but your are overpolicing this thing to death, and making all authors pay for the sins of of one or two, which is not the right thing to do, period.

Throwing your toys out of the pram won't get this resolved...

Regardless of your objections and countless reasons to continue a losing arguement, the fact remains that for at least until vB.org is upgraded to 3.5 it will enforce this rule :)

In the meantime, the staff will take into account the feedback they have recieved and make a decision on such - Constantly replying and continuing to pester them will not help you or your cause, nor will it allow them the time to think about it if they have to keep "putting the toys back in the pram" ;)

So calm down, leave it where it is, and trust that they are considering it as they have tried to explain numerous times...

Satan

tamarian 07-12-2005 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hellsatan
Throwing your toys out of the pram won't get this resolved...

What have you been smoking dude? Who said anything about me throwing my toys out? I love this place too much to do that, otherwise I wouldn't have cared enough to voice my objections to these new changes, and how they are being enforced.

You like to follow blindly and accept undisclosed reasons for changing things etc. be my guest, you're not alone.

Chris M 07-12-2005 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tamarian
What have you been smoking dude? Who said anything about me throwing my toys out? I love this place too much to do that, otherwise I wouldn't have cared enough to voice my objections to these new changes, and how they are being enforced.

You like to follow blindly and accept undisclosed reasons for changing things etc. be my guest, you're not alone.

Several reasons are not undisclosed - One of them, the main one that should be enough for you, is that the ADMINISTRATORS have decided it would be best...

I'm not following blindly - If you wish to use a tool such as this forum, you have to follow the rules, regardless of your stance for them or not...

You have said several times throughout this thread you are unhappy with the rules - Repeating yourself annoys people...

Satan

tamarian 07-12-2005 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hellsatan
You have said several times throughout this thread you are unhappy with the rules - Repeating yourself annoys people...

You are mistaken, or unaware of the distinction. The forum rules have not changed yet:

https://vborg.vbsupport.ru/rules.php?

My arguments in the last 3 threads are about specific points on changes in the direction and vision of vb.org, and possibly worse changes to come. I am not trying to repeat myself, simply replying to each newly presented argument, such as yours.

This forum started by hack authors who should have a voice. You are entitled to cheerlead these changes as much as you want, and you could care less why they're being done. But I'm entitled to make my objections noted. Deal with it.

Chris M 07-12-2005 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tamarian
You are mistaken, or unaware of the distinction. The forum rules have not changed yet:

https://vborg.vbsupport.ru/rules.php?

My arguments in the last 3 threads are about specific points on changes in the direction and vision of vb.org, and possibly worse changes to come. I am not trying to repeat myself, simply replying to each newly presented argument, such as yours.

This forum started by hack authors who should have a voice. You are entitled to cheerlead these changes as much as you want, and you could care less why they're being done. But I'm entitled to make my objections noted. Deal with it.

I'm not denying your right to make objections noted...

You still argue with me when I'm trying to get you to stop arguing...

You have made them known multiple times within this thread and others - I'm tired of reading a thread and having you repeatedly arguing with staff and other members about points you have already made clear earlier on in the thread...

I don't "care less" about them - I think it is a good idea to have them released in one format...

I'm not mistaken - This is an announcement about a new rule - Just because the rules.php file doesn't reflect this does not mean I am mistaken or you are correct ;)

Now you may have many conspiracy theories about this minor issue leading to the corruption of the world and a dictatorship ran by an online community, I don't care...

Your attitude is very confrontational and I simply believed that getting you to stop and let the issue die was the best idea - Apparently you are more stubborn than I anticipated...

You've made your points, the staff have made theirs - Drop the issue, walk away and see what happens...

Satan

tamarian 07-12-2005 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hellsatan
I'm tired of reading a thread and having you repeatedly arguing with staff and other members about points you have already made clear earlier on in the thread...

You have the option to unsubscribe.

Quote:

Now you may have many conspiracy theories about this minor issue leading to the corruption of the world and a dictatorship ran by an online community, I don't care...
That's your mistaken impresison, as I have made no such comparisons. But I think someone did make a reference to politics.

Quote:

Your attitude is very confrontational and I simply believed that getting you to stop and let the issue die was the best idea - Apparently you are more stubborn than I anticipated...
How does that differ from your attitude? Go get your club :)

Quote:

You've made your points, the staff have made theirs - Drop the issue, walk away and see what happens...
I'll try ;)

Paul M 07-12-2005 08:11 PM

I just find it pointless and annoying to have to zip up single files. I have no objection when multiple files are involved. It's also the fact that this request has actually been forced by removing the ability to upload text or php files on any post, not just the first post of hacks - as the saying goes - "a sledgehammer to crack a nut". :)

Chris M 07-12-2005 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tamarian
You have the option to unsubscribe.

I don't subscribe to threads - Contrary to beliefs threads can be viewed by looking in a forum not via an email subscription...

Quote:

Originally Posted by tamarian
That's your mistaken impresison, as I have made no such comparisons. But I think someone did make a reference to politics.

It's called sarcasm...

Quote:

Originally Posted by tamarian
How does that differ from your attitude? Go get your club :)

My attitude is a direct result of your continuing wish to argue - Go figure...

Quote:

Originally Posted by tamarian
I'll try ;)

Trying would involve no longer replying to this thread...

Satan

Regs 07-12-2005 09:09 PM

FWIW,

Erwin did say he was interested in hearing more.

Chris M 07-12-2005 09:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Erwin
Feel free to PM me to discuss.

:)

Satan

tamarian 07-13-2005 12:02 AM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erwin
Feel free to PM me to discuss.
Satan
I did.

Quote:

Trying would involve no longer replying to this thread...
Not really, as far as I'm concerned, I'll try not repeating points.

For example, as a new point, you still think this is a new rule.

It is not even a rule. Rules are placed for actions that you can take, but should not. And if you do not follow those rules, you accept to pay the consequences.

Uplaoding txt or xml or php is no longer possible. It's gone. For hacks, or for normal posts. You cannot do it even if you want to. So a rule for this does not make any sense.

Had it been a rule, it would go something like this "Do not upload large files unless they are compressed as a zip file. If you repeatedly upload large files (larger than 10 kb) without zipping, then ..... "

So that would be a rule.

Sorry you feel annoyed by my posts, but that's your problem.

Chris M 07-13-2005 12:45 AM

Just because you cannot swear (due to the filtering system) does not mean "not swearing" is not a rule any more ;)

It is a rule - Just because you cannot get around it doesn't make it any less of a rule...

The "annoyance" factor is more from your appeared lack of acceptance that the staff have already said they will think about it...

Satan

tamarian 07-13-2005 01:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hellsatan
Just because you cannot swear (due to the filtering system) does not mean "not swearing" is not a rule any more ;)

I assure you, I can swear if I feel like it. Filters only capture a few popular 4 letter words.

Quote:

It is a rule - Just because you cannot get around it doesn't make it any less of a rule...

The "annoyance" factor is more from your appeared lack of acceptance that the staff have already said they will think about it...

Satan
Feel free to give a feedback asking for this to be added a s a rule.

I actually do have a lack of acceptance to many things I object to, and I've been doing it since 2000 here and at vb.com. One of my favourites was when Jelsoft stopped offering Impex as a download, and demanded that people send their db's if they want them imported, and Jelsoft staff will do the importing for them.

I objected a lot stronger than I'm doing now. I annoyed a lot of people, and had people actually ask "What are you afraid of from submitting your database..." "Jelsoft already decided that, so stop" etc. blablabla. I kept at it, and thankfully, they dropped that decision.

If that annoys you, be annoyed.

Chris M 07-13-2005 01:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tamarian
I assure you, I can swear if I feel like it. Filters only capture a few popular 4 letter words.



Feel free to give a feedback asking for this to be added a s a rule.

I actually do have a lack of acceptance to many things I object to, and I've been doing it since 2000 here and at vb.com. One of my favourites was when Jelsoft stopped offering Impex as a download, and demanded that people send their db's if they want them imported, and Jelsoft staff will do the importing for them.

I objected a lot stronger than I'm doing now. I annoyed a lot of people, and had people actually ask "What are you afraid of from submitting your database..." "Jelsoft already decided that, so stop" etc. blablabla. I kept at it, and thankfully, they dropped that decision.

If that annoys you, be annoyed.

Honestly, Impex and a User's database are slightly different to objecting to using .zip as the way of uploading your hack/plugin/extension to a hack thread ;)

Satan

Guest190829 07-13-2005 01:26 AM

Where's the off button on this thread...it's just zipping files >_<

tamarian 07-13-2005 01:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hellsatan
Honestly, Impex and a User's database are slightly different to objecting to using .zip as the way of uploading your hack/plugin/extension to a hack thread ;)

It depends on the objective and the reason(s). Some scenarios say it is, some say it isn't. If it's just for the new hack database format, and for some reason that database cannot list anything but zip files, then you'd be right, and I'd be wrong. But that reason would not warrant such secrecy and fear of disclosure.

twoseven 07-13-2005 03:03 AM

do you visit any other forums? do the admins/staff run all changes of said forum through the people? not all forums do and i shouldnt expect this to be any different. even though this is a hacks community it isnt a public forum just as vb is viewable source not gnu. they can discuss what you said in private as all the same arguments have been done most likly.
if your really offened by this you could always release your hacks elsewhere. i know of several other sites that allow for this.

Tony G 07-13-2005 03:57 AM

Our aim isn't to have people stop releasing their hacks here over a bitter argument about zipping up files when releasing mods.

Quote:

It is not even a rule. Rules are placed for actions that you can take, but should not. And if you do not follow those rules, you accept to pay the consequences.

Uplaoding txt or xml or php is no longer possible. It's gone. For hacks, or for normal posts. You cannot do it even if you want to. So a rule for this does not make any sense.

Had it been a rule, it would go something like this "Do not upload large files unless they are compressed as a zip file. If you repeatedly upload large files (larger than 10 kb) without zipping, then ..... "

So that would be a rule.
Oh no, vB.org are making you follow rules? What kind of forum makes you follow rules? I thought they were there just to look good.

Chris M 07-13-2005 07:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tony G
Our aim isn't to have people stop releasing their hacks here over a bitter argument about zipping up files when releasing mods.



Oh no, vB.org are making you follow rules? What kind of forum makes you follow rules? I thought they were there just to look good.

ROFLMFAO :p

I'd imagine it is to make a common file format for the Hack Database, and also to allow users to download all the files in one .zip file so they get all the information they need (assuming the hack author zips up all the files :p) in one place, allowing for less trouble distinguishing the instructions and also allowing them to place all the files within a folder structure somewhere or whatever so they know what hacks they have installed ;)

Satan

Dean C 07-13-2005 08:02 AM

I think a good solution for everyone would be to have it automatically bundle the zip files, it's very possible and not hard to do at all :)

tamarian 07-13-2005 08:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by twoseven
do you visit any other forums? do the admins/staff run all changes of said forum through the people? not all forums do and i shouldnt expect this to be any different.

It's not the same. You and I don't come here to chat and post only. The main purpose of vb.org is to serve as a central point for release software modifications, the work of many authors.

You are entitled to suggest that authors should have no say about their work, I just think it's wrong, and the more it's done, the more it will reduce the quality of work being released.

Quote:

even though this is a hacks community it isnt a public forum just as vb is viewable source not gnu. they can discuss what you said in private as all the same arguments have been done most likly..
Not sure what GNU has to do with this.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tony G
Oh no, vB.org are making you follow rules? What kind of forum makes you follow rules? I thought they were there just to look good.

So why be so secretive to hide the reason for such a "rule" change?

Forum mods don't usually have to go in these circles trying to justify why the rules are being changed, yet can't say why, then try different reasons, like bandwith, yeah, that's the ticket.

Erwin 07-15-2005 05:55 AM

I am still amazed that this discussion is still going on - people, all we are asking is that you zip up files before attaching them - this is a download site - zipping up the downloads is a reasonable request.

I do note that the whole debate is fueled only by a small minority of members.

Bear in mind that things like this are always under review and such requirements may change when the needs of the site changes - if so, we will notify the members.

I am happy to discuss this further via PM.

What I'll do is split this thread up so that the discussion occurs in the Site Feedback forum.

Erwin 07-15-2005 06:03 AM

Thread split and moved. :)

Feel free to keep discussing.

Erwin 07-15-2005 06:12 AM

I do want to add that if lots of hack authors start complaining that zipping up attachments is too much of an inconvenience and that it really is a huge problem, then obviously we will review the need to do it. I do not want to appear that we are not listening to feedback. However, it does appear that most hack authors don't really care and would not mind zipping up attachments. Please correct me if I am wrong though.

Paul M 07-15-2005 06:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Erwin
Thread split and moved. :)

Feel free to keep discussing.

There seems little point really - as your next post seems to make it clear that if only a "minority" express a view [care] then you aren't going to review anything. :)

Revan 07-15-2005 07:17 AM

I don't mind zipping up hacks, even if it's only 1 file. When dloading a hack, however, unzipping 1 file is hassle.
I'd prefer it if you could allow an un-zipped hack to be released if it only contained 1 file (install instructions included).

Marco van Herwaarden 07-15-2005 08:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Revan
I don't mind zipping up hacks, even if it's only 1 file. When dloading a hack, however, unzipping 1 file is hassle.
I'd prefer it if you could allow an un-zipped hack to be released if it only contained 1 file (install instructions included).

I understand what you mean, although i don't agree in every situation.

What i do myself for a hack is adding the version number to the zipped name, while the hackfile itself stay with one name. Example:

My Hack v1.00.zip
-->myhack.php

My Hack v1.01.zip
-->myhack.php

This makes it easier to keep multiple versions, without changing the file names.

Also you can put in the directory structure if you are using zip-files. I see a lot less mistakes if you zip your files relative to the forumhome directory, then to instruct to upload to a specific directory.

The above are all arguments that have been used in our discussion before we started the zip-file request.

In the end we are trying to improve things, and if something doesn't work out as we expected, we can always review it, and make adjustments, or turn things back.

Erwin 07-15-2005 09:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul M
There seems little point really - as your next post seems to make it clear that if only a "minority" express a view [care] then you aren't going to review anything. :)

That may be the case, but that doesn't mean we should close this thread and stop further discussion. :) I moved this discussion out of Announcements as such discussions belong here rather than there.

Chris M 07-15-2005 10:17 AM

Agreed Marco ;)

But I also agree with what Paul M says - We should re-allow .txt files for single instruction files;)

Satan

tamarian 07-15-2005 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Erwin
I am still amazed that this discussion is still going on - people, all we are asking is that you zip up files before attaching them - this is a download site - zipping up the downloads is a reasonable request.

Not really. I've already been zipping up my multiple-file hacks before this started. It is a download site, but a download site running gzip by default, so zipping files is redundant.

Vb.org is not really "asking", you disabled the possibility of uploading anything other than zip files, so the request doesn't make any sense.

The outrage of some developers (minority?) is due to forcing zips for single files, even for posts that are not hacks.

The outrage of another minority who speculate on the real motive (maybe just me), is that you are penalizing the many for the sins of the few. This is the case here, and is the case for disabling the who installed this hack feature. This an alarming trend, and can only get worse.

The more you put the squeeze on authors and make things less pleasant, with less tools, less say, plus a bit of suspicion, you grow a sense of "us" and "them" on this forum, you'd get less motivation, less interest and less quality of future releases. There's no real winners in this scenaro, not even Jelsoft.

Erwin 07-15-2005 09:53 PM

We are discussing this matter (as in vB.org staff, vB.com staff and Jelsoft) so please give us some time to reach a resolution.

In the meantime, I am closing this thread - not because I want to stifle further discussion but because I understand (truly I do) the concerns of the members and will bring up their concerns with relevant people.

Thank you for your patience, and again, my PM box and the PM box of staff are open. My apologies if any inconvenience has been caused in the meantime. We hope to reach a resolution soon.

Erwin 07-16-2005 03:25 AM

UPDATE: If you have multiple files, please ZIP them up. But if it's one file, for the moment, you can upload it as TXT, XML or PHP, without zipping. :)

Thread re-opened.

Link14716 07-16-2005 03:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Erwin
UPDATE: If you have multiple files, please ZIP them up. But if it's one file, for the moment, you can upload it as TXT, XML or PHP, without zipping. :)

Thread re-opened.

That makes a bit more sense. https://vborg.vbsupport.ru/external/2011/01/19.gif

Paul M 07-16-2005 04:44 AM

A sensible choice indeed. :)

Tony G 07-16-2005 04:55 AM

Now we can all make up and stop arguing? ;)

Guest190829 07-16-2005 06:12 AM

Yay, thank you Erwin, for stopping the havoc. :bunny:

^^ that smilie isn't used much...

tamarian 07-16-2005 06:26 AM

Thanks Erwin, et al. :up:

Paul M 07-16-2005 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tony G
Now we can all make up and stop arguing? ;)

Outside, now ...... ;)

kooks47 10-10-2005 08:56 PM

awesome man... nice job

Chris M 10-10-2005 09:31 PM

kooks47,

You are currently showing up as unlicensed. To be able to download hacks and/or receive support here at vBulletin.org, we ask you to please click here (vB-germany users click here) and enter your email address, to show us that you are licensed.

You will need to use your customer number and password (which will be in the email you got when you paid for your license) to access that page. Please note that your email is case sensitive. The update of your account may take up to one hour.

Thank you.


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:32 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by vBS
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

X vBulletin 3.8.12 by vBS Debug Information
  • Page Generation 0.02286 seconds
  • Memory Usage 1,871KB
  • Queries Executed 10 (?)
More Information
Template Usage:
  • (1)ad_footer_end
  • (1)ad_footer_start
  • (1)ad_header_end
  • (1)ad_header_logo
  • (1)ad_navbar_below
  • (32)bbcode_quote_printable
  • (1)footer
  • (1)gobutton
  • (1)header
  • (1)headinclude
  • (6)option
  • (1)pagenav
  • (1)pagenav_curpage
  • (3)pagenav_pagelink
  • (1)post_thanks_navbar_search
  • (1)printthread
  • (40)printthreadbit
  • (1)spacer_close
  • (1)spacer_open 

Phrase Groups Available:
  • global
  • postbit
  • showthread
Included Files:
  • ./printthread.php
  • ./global.php
  • ./includes/init.php
  • ./includes/class_core.php
  • ./includes/config.php
  • ./includes/functions.php
  • ./includes/class_hook.php
  • ./includes/modsystem_functions.php
  • ./includes/class_bbcode_alt.php
  • ./includes/class_bbcode.php
  • ./includes/functions_bigthree.php 

Hooks Called:
  • init_startup
  • init_startup_session_setup_start
  • init_startup_session_setup_complete
  • cache_permissions
  • fetch_threadinfo_query
  • fetch_threadinfo
  • fetch_foruminfo
  • style_fetch
  • cache_templates
  • global_start
  • parse_templates
  • global_setup_complete
  • printthread_start
  • pagenav_page
  • pagenav_complete
  • bbcode_fetch_tags
  • bbcode_create
  • bbcode_parse_start
  • bbcode_parse_complete_precache
  • bbcode_parse_complete
  • printthread_post
  • printthread_complete