Yes, and if you view the code, it uses Mozilla-specific extensions instead of W3C-compliant CSS.

I like it enough to resear a way to do it with W3C compliant code. And when I figure it out..I WILL POST IT FOR EVERYONE.

lmao go for it

i do know the basics already. have to know them to do most web.dev. outside of wysiwyg editors.
and filburt
if your going to be so anonymous why even post? its like me posting about a hack i have then saying go figure it out on your own. there is always psudo-code or even letting us know the logic behind it.

A smart guy Knows stuff....

a wise man shares his knowledge.

a Smartass knows stuff and ....

....well i don't know what he does but i think he posts stuff and teases people and is mean.

Is there a rule that I can't post threads now or something? Respectfully, you all need to calm down. If you don't care about my post, then don't reply to it.

We care that's why we post. We care that you are essentially saying:

"neh neh neneneh...I know something you don't and I'm not gona tell you" <play the annoying rythm in your head>

If it won't work with IE, then it won't be any good to me, anyway. ;)

yea does kinda defeat the purpose if 90% of the people out there cant see it doesnt it.

Use it as a way of advocating alternate browsers to that garbage of a software XD