For all above I agree, as we know some times is how we see it. Its only opinions.

For this maybe I don't understand the answer, or I was not clearly what I mentioned. I did not say for usergroups but for id fields.

id field(biograghy) | 5(posts)
id location | 10 posts

and so on

If you mean all this as usergroup, its ok, sorry for misunderstanding :confused:

Yes, I did not read your post thoroughly, for some reason I saw usergroupid rather than fieldid. :)

However, to me I think it is better to have 1 number for grace posts that applies to having to fill out any fields. For example, suppose you have 6 profile fields you have set as required via this product, and field1 has 10 grace posts, field2 has 20 grace posts, and so on. A new user would be "bothered" by the error message instructing them to fill out a profile field at 6 different times. I think it is better to bother them once, and get everything done at the same time. :)

Yes, that's a good point.
It depends what fields has every forum that needs to force users.
If you put them all at once maybe it will happen as you say.

I don't think that there will be so many fields to use this modification. But it will be much help when ever we make a new field. You know what will happen. Mod will force users with the standard post count. Many fields that I have seen are different regardless of the type of forum.

We may force them to put there "Real name" after 1 post, but we cannot force them to write in which forum are fun, after three months (this field I had experience before 6 months on a Site that I was register.

Any way this could be an + option and all other exists to.
Lets see here other users what to say. And finaly as it is, is very good :D