Okay, I am officially done fixing the bugs. I'm about to write up some quick documentation. It's going to be short and sweet for the moment, I'll try to do some more in-depth later.

After I get that typed out then the new addon will be published here. I'll post the thread URL and send out an announcement thingy for everyone.

If by chance you do not hear back from me today, it's because my DSL or power went out. It is storming like crazy here today and we usually loose one or the other during such bad weather.

Oh i am really bored with ppl complain for something they didnt payed a dime, they didnt contribute a single idea, they didnt pay some respect... (not that doing this they will be ok to complain, but u get what i mean)

The guy is doing a wonderfull job, stop make him feel bad....

i'll be as succinct on this subject as i can be:

first, jason doesn't have to do this. he could just say 'the heck with it' and move on, much like what happened to the timeslip database hack, but he didn't. he's taking time from his business and personal life to get this done for us. he isn't being paid to do so, so i think quite a bit of consideration should be given.

second, my forum members have been screaming for the return of this hack. i've been keeping them updated just as jason updates us. they're aching for it nearly as badly as they are for the timeslip database hack, but they're in the same boat i'm in: we have to wait for everything to be done and tested.

i'm more than happy to wait for this. it's a tremendous help to my site, with the dozens of transactions between members taking place, however we all want a hack that's free of bugs and if it means waiting a few extra days, then so be it.

i would much rather have something that works right the first time than have it not work and be buggy.




kudos to you jason, one for doing this in the first place and two for putting up with us. :tup:

Don't upgrade.
With comments like that you only look like a monkeys ass, fool...
Thanks for all you hard work Jason!

After reading all the comments I have thought it over and I apologize to you jason.

Thanks to all for their feedback.

I feel like a little kid on christmas morning :D

Yay, finally some DRAMA! ;) Keep up the good work Jason. Love ya so much, I just peed a little in my pants.

ATTENTION EVERYONE:

iTrader v2.0.0 has officially been released! (The new version for vB 3.5.x)...

Give it a whirl and post your comments in that thread.

Thanks :)

omg, here comes the pee

will you still have support for this hack? is there a update to this also?

No, there will not be any more releases for vB 3.0.x...

I would recommend upgrading to vB 3.5.x, it makes implemeting custom things like this MUCH easier.

HAHHA

Thanks Jason!

I hope it is OK, just thought I'd put the link to the iTrader v2.0.0 here.

hi all, i have 3.5.1 has this compatible with it yet?

i had it before upgrading and my members are getting toey and want it back :)

for the 3.5.x version the link is right above your post.

yes but is it exactly the same database/table/data wise?

i only ask because i was using Trader Ratings previously and i have loads of data from forum members still there just waiting for me to reinstall this. im hopeing that when i reinstall, all that data will become visible again. ie; all their feedback etc

tables have changed names etc So there is a upgrade script to move all the data to the new structure.

thanks sniper, will definately give installing this a shot ASAP. thanks again! :)

thanks! i just upgraded my board to 3.5x & will re-install this asap. :)

can anyone help me display the "summary page" that was featured with Trader Ratings 1.20?

when i added a menu item to navbar for itrader it always shows my OWN rating. The code is below, which limits it to logged in members only. All help appreciated :)

I get this error. What should I do?

I am getting this error when I click the Trader Rating from a member profile.

Can anyone help?

I got it fixed (the error I had) but one more thing.

I have made it so the url is required, and in the readme it says to edit out the 'optional' if you do this. Problem is, I can't find where to edit it at all.

when I try to install this, and get to the /install_traderratings.php and click on the add templates, i get the following error immediately..

Fatal error: Call to a member function query_first() on a non-object in /home/thatgirl/public_html/legacy/swap/admincp/install_traderratings.php on line 468

similar when I try upgrade.. and I cant get it working :/

Hey GSX,
When I changed mine from Required to Optional, it did it on it's own. I changed it in the iTrader settings page...
Hope that helps somehow.

Could someone tell me if there is anyway to start a member off with a certain # of feedback? For example if on my php board someone had 50 feedback is there a way I can manually change their feedback in iTrader to read 50 positive feedback without having to retype each feedback?

I am getting this on a fresh install. Please help.

Thank you! :)

Me too.:surprised:

me 2 same error, fresh install today

Fatal error: Call to a member function on a non-object in /home/groupbuy/public_html/forums/admincp/install_traderratings.php on line 468

is there a hack to keep some users from leaving feedback?

I have a user who insists on abusing this and I'd really hate for him to ruin it for everyone

same error

How i fix???
Fatal error: Call to a member function on a non-object in /home/content/s/h/a/shanevas2/html/admincp/install_traderratings.php on line 468

Installed it, admin can rate but users receive message: "The iTrader system is currently closed"
Anyone can help?

Any chance of this working on 3.6.8? I see this on a vB i am on and they use 3.6.8.

SVT

Fatal error: Call to a member function on a non-object in /home/content/m/o/f/mofohex/html/forum/admincp/install_traderratings.php on line 468
i broke it before i even got it, whats going on here?

I also have this problem (as above)

A fix or a way to resolve the issue would be great.

I'm guessing this mod no longer has support then.. i see people have been waiting for a response to the same problem as me since 2006...

My question exactly.