If I am not using crosslinking, do I need to do any of the template changes?

artpapa: In the meantime you can remove the '?' image via your main css options where you added the glossary code to at the very bottom, delete the image that is used. For more information to what I mean look in the install readme.

dendrob: I can't really say, I've been try to get this released but I havn't had much free time in the past week and a half. Anyway before I release the new version I need to first finish the install text and then it'd be done for this version. So lets cross our fingers and hope I finish this week! lol

dilbert: If your not using crosslinking all you have to do is disable the option in your settings, no template changes needed.

I have what is probably a stupid question, but I can't figure it out. I assume my answer is in the "extra css" that got added, but I don't see a font color to change. My problem is that the hover text is white on a very light yellow background and so it is unreadable. Which variable do I need to change to get the font color black or some dark color so that it can be read. Otherwise, this is an awsome hack that my users will love.

I am crossing everything I've got !!! $20 says, you won't finish it by Wednesday ! ;)

Just curious, are you planning to port this hack to 3.6 ?

It works fine as it is on 3.6.0 Beta 1, as far as I can tell.. :)

Oh !!! Sweeet !!!

First of all, I would like to thank you for this outstandingly wonderful product! I appreciate the great coding and hard work you have put into it!

I have a few bugs to consider on your next release, as I think fixes for them will really enhannce the performance.

1) On the "Add Glossary Term" Screen (the one using the WYSIWYG editor, not the one in the AdminCP), it would be nice to have options to place the term online and specify the category.

2) On the search results, crosslinked items do not parse the links, but show them like: "<a href=etc". This makes the search results bulky and such. It would be great to see the links show up.

Thanks again for your hard work!

Hola,

Awesome program. I have converted over from cinq's glossary because of lack of support. There are a few things I noticed that seem to not crosslink properly...

1. Punctuation, if the term has a period at the end it will not link.
2. Paranthesis.... example... Ca(OH)2 ... will not cross link.

Ohh, it would be really cool if it would give the glossary definiton when a user mouses over the word... I was doing this with cinq's version.

Anyways, like I said... great program, keep the awesome work up and thanks!!

offline, all these issues were already addressed earlier in the thread