I installed it and sent some PMs. It told me they were sent succesfully but nothing was sent to anyone. Does this hack work in 3.6.4?

If you look back 1-2 pages and review it yourself you can have a feel for it

Username need to be html_entity_decode and overridequota option need to be enable when sending PMs
$]

I guess it wouldnt hurt when I release a good version for vb 3.6

https://vborg.vbsupport.ru/showthread.php?t=141459

Have fun.

(ZT, I sent you an PM, but didnt get your respond, so I go ahead and release the new version, for members. Hope you dont mind, otherwise, let me know :) )
---------------------------------------


Never mind on the above release, I release a new one here:
Yet Another Private Message System 1.0.1

I think he is not interesting in this. I have send him PMs for Months now. :)

So anybody - go ahead and Update : Admin Mass Private Message System for vB 3.6

Where did the link go?

i think ZT asked to be removed

@ZT...would you please either update your hack or let others do it...they asked you nicely.....and gave you credit when you even did not answer them..i dont get it.........do you want to punish everyone who used your hack??

@mtha...you are a real gentelman...thank you

No he didn't
He hasen't even been online
Calm Down.

The person that released it had no permission

Hi Shazz,

Honestly though, we're allowed to discuss the changes and explain how to do them, but not allowed to post them? That's not a very logical or practical approach. It's like ridiculous government red tape everywhere, it just hampers everyone.

Everyone comes here for support, and there is red tape everywhere and obviously no support on some threads. I have seen this situation on numerous threads in here over the last few weeks.

VB.org needs to bring in a policy, where if hack authors disappear for a prolonged period, then in the interests of VBulletin hacks and the support level on this great website, other coders should be allowed to offer support and update those hacks, period.

That is a totally workable and acceptable solution in my opinion. And solutions, not rules, are what we need.

What hack author would not want members here to get support from other great coders if they can't be here? If they did have a problem, they could always mention it in the top of the hack thread "no other coders to touch my work", etc. I doubt people would be voting for their hacks though if they did do this.

My submission to VB.org is to update your policy guidelines so that this great site can function in the flawless way it was designed (to give great hacks and great support for those hacks).

Regards

Reggie

lol...i am calm shaz....see......:D

i was just making a point......correct me if i am wrong


if some one makes a chat system for ex. or an arcade system.....and he uses vbulletin members info jut to integrate his chat or arcade system......this person is entitled to say dont use my code


but when you use mebers info (built in vbulletin) to connect to PM system (again built in vbulletin) just to be send in groups....i dont think personally that you can say dont use my code........because the original code is already there

otherwise lets say there are 3 or 4 hacks for 2 Navbar system...3 or 4 paypal donate systems...these all should fight for that connection system too...but they dont...because those (same as this hack) are just modification for the original hack.....

this hack is a modification for the already built in feature in vbulletin........so why do we argue about it...

saying this i am still grateful for ZT for enjoying his hack for so long.....but also to mtha for updating it

i am still calm...:) see