vb.org Archive

vb.org Archive (https://vborg.vbsupport.ru/index.php)
-   Community Lounge (https://vborg.vbsupport.ru/forumdisplay.php?f=13)
-   -   Kier Throws Down Gauntlet To Template Magicians (https://vborg.vbsupport.ru/showthread.php?t=92116)

sabret00the 07-13-2005 09:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brad
Why support dial-up users? I mean honestly, who would want someone to browse their forum with dial-up? :rolleyes:

dial up is different and this serves them with speed increases, but IE4, isn't forcing them to upgrade for their own good with all the nasty virus's that were tailor made for the browser actually doing them and their address book members a favour?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chroder
On Webmaster-Talk, our stats show there 7714 hits from people using <IE5 from this year.

Albeit, it is a very small chunk of users.

yup define hits and define the total to give us an idea of overall usage.

Corriewf 07-13-2005 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sabret00the
Where's Wayne's post gone?


The first rule about fight club is that we do not talk about fight club. :ninja:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brad
Why support dial-up users? I mean honestly, who would want someone to browse their forum with dial-up? :rolleyes:


If dial up users could upgrade for free then I would block them too.

filburt1 07-13-2005 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brad
Why support dial-up users? I mean honestly, who would want someone to browse their forum with dial-up? :rolleyes:

The majority of Internet users still have it, so you have to. To be honest, though, any decent layout should not weight so much as to take a long time to load in any browser, which ominously leads back to the original matter in that table markup (the model and view) defining a page's layout uses more bandwidth than semantic markup (the model) backed up by a style (the view).

calorie 07-13-2005 10:29 PM

<a href="http://www.corecss.com/properties/full-chart.php" target="_blank">http://www.corecss.com/properties/full-chart.php</a> :ninja:

Chroder 07-13-2005 11:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sabret00the
yup define hits and define the total to give us an idea of overall usage.

Quote:

Hits: Any files requested from the server (including files that are "Pages")
So just about everything ;) Amongst the other browsers, all the <IE4 hits (including IE4 and even IE3) account for about 0.5% of our total hits. (I couldn't find a browser stat that represented "unique visitors". But putting this stat into perspective gives the general idea.)

Wayne Luke 07-13-2005 11:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sabret00the
Where's Wayne's post gone?

It was redundant.. I deleted it.

twoseven 07-13-2005 11:13 PM

my thought is it could all be 1 user 7,000+ hits isnt uncomon if you dont filter that over a time period (say 12hrs) for 1 user. so .5% of the hits could come from 1 user over the duration of your logging period. also it depends when the stats started to be generated.

sabret00the 07-13-2005 11:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chroder
So just about everything ;) Amongst the other browsers, all the <IE4 hits (including IE4 and even IE3) account for about 0.5% of our total hits. (I couldn't find a browser stat that represented "unique visitors". But putting this stat into perspective gives the general idea.)

7,000 hits outta 1million is alot different to 7k outta 50k

Chris M 07-13-2005 11:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sabret00the
7,000 hits outta 1million is alot different to 7k outta 50k

0.5% of the hits suggests the former ;)

At a rough estimate, I'd say it's 7k out of 1.4 million ;)

Satan

bigcurt 07-14-2005 01:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wayne Luke
It was redundant.. I deleted it.

The glorious bold name :paranoid:

Tony G 07-14-2005 03:53 AM

That's one mighty challenge. I'm going to definitely pass. ;)

Reeve of shinra 07-14-2005 04:06 AM

MS doesnt even support IE4 and as a result alot of companies aren't either. I don't see why vb really should at this point.

On the other hand, if they did, maybe there should be a new more css oriented design with an admin option to turn on a style that conforms to IE 4.x. A basic style. Nothing fancy, no extra options.

tamarian 07-14-2005 04:15 AM

This is a great site for that sort of thing:

http://www.alistapart.com/

Revan 07-14-2005 07:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dean C
Filip the best way to learn CSS is to just read the vast amounts of information which are now online, and then if you get stuck as on SitePoint, they have some real CSS gurus there who have never failed me in the past :D!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danny.VBT
HTML Utopia: Designing Without Tables Using CSS, it's a site point book, and a great one at that. Very well worth the money. :up:

Thanks mates, I'll check this out in abit. :) My girl just sent me a 14 page document she wants me to read and comment on, so back to the salt mines ;)

Dean C 07-14-2005 08:09 AM

Are my eyes seeing things or did I just see someone say they strive to support IE4. This is ridiculous. If the biggest organisation in the world has discontinued support for it, that's telling you something. I'd put money on it that there are less than 10k internet users worldwide using IE4.

Marco van Herwaarden 07-14-2005 08:51 AM

http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp
This will show that only 0.5% of the visitors of w3schools in july 2002 was still using IE4.

http://www.upsdell.com/BrowserNews/stat.htm
Stats on the usage of IE4, vary from 0.05% to 0.45%

Also have a look at:
http://www.thecounter.com/stats/2005/June/browser.php
http://www.ews.uiuc.edu/bstats/latest-month.html
http://www.webreference.com/stats/browser.html (there are still hits on IE3, maybe we should support that too :D)



PS have a look at these stats from 1996: :D
http://www.useit.com/alertbox/browsers_dec96.html

sabret00the 07-14-2005 09:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zachery
We need to support IE4+.

Someone showed a tableless phpbb design, it crashed in IE5:2 Mac, which is baslcy IE5/5.5, which doesn't cut it.

well looking at this: http://www.vbulletin.com/forum/showp...8&postcount=74
let's say this post/requirement by zachery has been negated :)


also from http://www.vbulletin.com/forum/showp...3&postcount=63
Quote:

The style must render identically in all major browsers (IE6, Firefox 1.0, Opera 7.x, Safari 2.x, Konqueror)
i suggest people play on the technicallities of the post.

Zachery 07-14-2005 04:06 PM

Even so, if somthing like that won't manage on IE5 its not going to cut it either. I do know alotof people still running IE5

sabret00the 07-14-2005 05:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zachery
Even so, if somthing like that won't manage on IE5 its not going to cut it either. I do know alotof people still running IE5

5.0 is a big cry from 4.0 and alot easier to support.

Dean C 07-14-2005 05:58 PM

Yep sabe, IE5 is very easy to deal with once you know the bugs it has :)

Chris M 07-14-2005 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dean C
Yep sabe, IE5 is very easy to deal with once you know the bugs it has :)

Shouldn't it be easier to list the bugs it doesn't have? ;)

Satan

Marco van Herwaarden 07-14-2005 07:47 PM

Microsoft call them features. :D

Revan 07-14-2005 07:51 PM

f00ls! No products from M$ have bugs, they have unexpected features.

Onimua 07-15-2005 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Revan
f00ls! No products from M$ have bugs, they have unexpected features.

LOL

Wow... that made my morning. :p

So... anyone advancing on the CSS-only style for vBulletin yet? :ninja:

Chris M 07-15-2005 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Onimua
LOL

Wow... that made my morning. :p

So... anyone advancing on the CSS-only style for vBulletin yet? :ninja:

I'm watching the competition, ready to steal their style ;)

Satan

sabret00the 07-15-2005 11:32 AM

$samepoint_samejoke = array_merge(marco's post, revan's post);

Chris M 07-15-2005 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sabret00the
$samepoint_samejoke = array_merge(marco's post, revan's post);

They aren't arrays :p

Satan

sabret00the 07-15-2005 11:41 AM

damn you

PHP Code:

$original_jokes $DB_site->query("
SELECT *
FROM posts
WHERE postid IN(735835, 735843)
"
);

while (
$og_jokes $DB_site->fetch_array($original_jokes)
{
$samepoint_samejoke[] .= $og_jokes;
}

print_r($samepoint_samejoke); 

they are now :p

Chris M 07-15-2005 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sabret00the
damn you

PHP Code:

$original_jokes $DB_site->query("
SELECT *
FROM posts
WHERE postid IN(735835, 735843)
"
);
 
while (
$og_jokes $DB_site->fetch_array($original_jokes)
{
$samepoint_samejoke[] .= $og_jokes;
}
 
print_r($samepoint_samejoke); 

they are now :p

Indeed :p

However that won't work in 3.5 :p

PHP Code:

$original_jokes $db->query_read(
SELECT * 
FROM posts 
WHERE postid IN(735835, 735843) 
"
); 
 
while (
$og_jokes $db->fetch_array($original_jokes))

$samepoint_samejoke[] .= $og_jokes

 
print_r($samepoint_samejoke); 

Satan

Dean C 07-15-2005 11:48 AM

You're both missing a closing parentheses on this line:
while ($og_jokes = $db->fetch_array($original_jokes)

Shame on you both...

Chris M 07-15-2005 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dean C
You're both missing a closing parentheses on this line:
while ($og_jokes = $db->fetch_array($original_jokes)

Shame on you both...

I merely copied his code and altered it :p

He is to blame lol:squareeyed:

Corrected in mine ;)

Satan

sabret00the 07-15-2005 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hellsatan
I merely copied his code and altered it :p

He is to blame lol:squareeyed:

Corrected in mine ;)

Satan

a mistake in code is the sign of a true coding genius ;) :p

Marco van Herwaarden 07-15-2005 06:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sabret00the
a mistake in code is the sign of a true coding genius

That is why they made me a mod, i am a genius in making mistakes.

Corriewf 07-15-2005 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MarcoH64
That is why they made me a mod, i am a genius in making mistakes.


I thoughts its because you deposited $1,000.00 in Brad's checking account.

sabret00the 07-15-2005 07:00 PM

Getting back on topic though, things are really hotting up in the thread, as discussion heats up over the matter you can really feel tempers flaring as vB fan-boys go against xhtml-activists, but for all the love of discussion nobody as of yes has excepted the challenge (which is why it needs the exposure of the .org portal). could this all go pear shaped? or will xhtml win out sighting a full template re-structure for 3.5 gold, it's all very exciting, especially with a perspective spot up for grabs in the admincp credits, we'll all have to watch very closely to see what happens as the battle of xhtml vs mega tablage battle continues. will the moaners show off their sheer ability or will they finally sit in silence, if you're good at xhtml you can decide, if you're not then support the threads with a post in the hope of an outcome eihter way, it's upto youuuuuuuuu.

Quote:

Originally Posted by MarcoH64
That is why they made me a mod, i am a genius in making mistakes.

as a fellow genius, i reckonised you. :ninja:

in a strange twist of fate, the thread now has it's own thread and move's here: http://www.vbulletin.com/forum/showthread.php?t=146952

we'll tell you more about this as it happens :anchorman:

twoseven 07-15-2005 07:58 PM

sabre u mean
Quote:

Originally Posted by sabret00the
excepted

or accepted?
excepted means: To leave out
accepted means: To answer affirmatively
which one did u mean in your post?

Marco van Herwaarden 07-15-2005 08:21 PM

He is trying to look like a genius. :D

sabret00the 07-15-2005 08:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by twoseven
sabre u mean

excepted
or accepted?
excepted means: To leave out
accepted means: To answer affirmatively
which one did u mean in your post?

totally meant accepted. :o

Quote:

Originally Posted by MarcoH64
He is trying to look like a genius.

you know me too well :ninja: ;)

Chris M 07-15-2005 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MarcoH64
He is trying to look like a genius. :D

Trying but failing miserably ;)

Satan

Erwin 07-15-2005 11:34 PM

I have seen one or two vB forums that uses no tables. Very nice looking but can't remember the links.


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by vBS
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

X vBulletin 3.8.12 by vBS Debug Information
  • Page Generation 0.01655 seconds
  • Memory Usage 1,845KB
  • Queries Executed 10 (?)
More Information
Template Usage:
  • (1)ad_footer_end
  • (1)ad_footer_start
  • (1)ad_header_end
  • (1)ad_header_logo
  • (1)ad_navbar_below
  • (3)bbcode_php_printable
  • (30)bbcode_quote_printable
  • (1)footer
  • (1)gobutton
  • (1)header
  • (1)headinclude
  • (6)option
  • (1)pagenav
  • (1)pagenav_curpage
  • (2)pagenav_pagelink
  • (1)post_thanks_navbar_search
  • (1)printthread
  • (40)printthreadbit
  • (1)spacer_close
  • (1)spacer_open 

Phrase Groups Available:
  • global
  • postbit
  • showthread
Included Files:
  • ./printthread.php
  • ./global.php
  • ./includes/init.php
  • ./includes/class_core.php
  • ./includes/config.php
  • ./includes/functions.php
  • ./includes/class_hook.php
  • ./includes/modsystem_functions.php
  • ./includes/class_bbcode_alt.php
  • ./includes/class_bbcode.php
  • ./includes/functions_bigthree.php 

Hooks Called:
  • init_startup
  • init_startup_session_setup_start
  • init_startup_session_setup_complete
  • cache_permissions
  • fetch_threadinfo_query
  • fetch_threadinfo
  • fetch_foruminfo
  • style_fetch
  • cache_templates
  • global_start
  • parse_templates
  • global_setup_complete
  • printthread_start
  • pagenav_page
  • pagenav_complete
  • bbcode_fetch_tags
  • bbcode_create
  • bbcode_parse_start
  • bbcode_parse_complete_precache
  • bbcode_parse_complete
  • printthread_post
  • printthread_complete