![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Panjo keeps buyer and seller contact info. Panjo does not sell the info. Panjo plans to send its own 'marketing' emails. For example, a digest of items that might interest a buyer. However a member would be able to unsubscribe from any non transactional email. We haven't sent marketing emails to date. That is on our product roadmap. Members have requested 'what's new' and other similar email subscription options. Those emails would drive members to your site. |
Quote:
At present, we don't support modifying the page title. We have that on the product roadmap. |
Quote:
Example: Listings created in the Panjo plugin on this Porsche community create thread posts in this Porsche classifieds subforum. |
Still waiting to hear back from Tom Mourmouras on skype still nothing
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
You can find more Panjo contact info here: http://panjo.com/Contact |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Force, all of them from DBTech should be updated, no new version number, just files patched.
|
It does say some are hot fixed but I can't find a list of what ones have been
|
All of them have that had the php warnings. :)
|
Hmm. The entire mod seems to have just vanished from my site. Just blank. Which is mildly embarrassing.
|
Quote:
|
Any Screen shots please?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If you aren't on vBulletin version 4.2.2, you can find Panjo screen shots here and on the Panjo blog. |
Got a question for you.
Someone playfully clicked on the "Buy Now" button and completed the form but he has no real intention of buying the item. In this case, the ad is then marked as "SOLD". How can the advertiser/admin change the status back to normal? Thanks. |
1 Attachment(s)
|
Quote:
If the seller listed 1 of something for sale and a buyer playfully purchased it with no intent to purchase, there isn't a shortcut for the seller to relist the item. At this time, the seller has to relist the item from scratch. And again, if the buyer actually paid, the seller would owe the buyer a refund. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Server Error in '/' Application.
Runtime Error etc etc ... (today, when trying to list new item) What's the deal, yo. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Anyone else have reviews?
|
Mine is pre-installed with Vbulletin. There have been some feedback from users saying they have problem posting ads but we already have more than 1k ads posted. The page sometimes load a little slow too.
I like how the thumbnails are displayed on the main page. Click here if you like to see more of my site's users feedback |
Quote:
http://panjo.com/Examples |
Quote:
I'm afraid that's pretty much instantly turned me off on the idea of using Panjo to replace our classifieds. Most especially the part about sellers needing to create a Panjo account!?!? WTF? |
Quote:
1) The Panjo plugin helps facilitate the exchange of buyer and seller information in the case of a successful sale. Thus, buyers and sellers need to agree to terms and conditions related to the release of their contact information. 2) For sites using Panjo to generate revenue, the Panjo plugin is involved in the collection of fees. Sellers need to agree to terms related to fee collection. |
Hi Panjo
Any chance of removing the (Local Pickup) prefix in the thread title? Kinda ugly aesthetically. Here's a link to it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Some of this info is already outdated since they switched to PayPal.
I have been implementing this and have asked lots of questions, so here is how I understand it. Panjo currently uses PayPal as the payment processor so the only fee the seller pays is the paypal fee's + and fees imposed by the forums. At this time the PayPal fees are immediately taken out and the seller get the price of the sold item minus paypal fee. What is a little hazy is when the forum owners get paid if they are charging a fee. As I understand it Panjo collects this separately and later from the seller to then pay the forum owners BUT they are working to have this all be part of the paypal system so that at the time of the sale the seller and the forum operator gets paid. |
Quote:
As it is now, the seller is paid, then asked for some of that payment back after 30 days. When the seller posts his item for sale, notification of the forum transaction fee is in fine print using nebulous language. "30 Days after your item sells, [Your Forum] will ask for a [X]% contribution." To me, that makes the fee sound optional, and I can't really imagine my members wanting to pay a fee that comes a month after they're done with the transaction. I know I'd be annoyed. Here's a stop-gap measure: Panjo should instead charge the forum fee (as a separate transaction) at the time the item is purchased. That way the seller associates it with the sale and is just happy to get paid. You also know they have the money in their paypal account because they just got paid! I don't mind if Panjo then waits a month to send me the fee. I'm more interested in the experience of my forum members. |
I agree and I pointed out that it looks shady (the fine print) and also in order for this to work they really need to put the forum owners first since without them there is no point.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:59 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by vBS
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
X vBulletin 3.8.12 by vBS Debug Information | |
---|---|
|
|
![]() |
|
Template Usage:
Phrase Groups Available:
|
Included Files:
Hooks Called:
|