vb.org Archive

vb.org Archive (https://vborg.vbsupport.ru/index.php)
-   Community Lounge (https://vborg.vbsupport.ru/forumdisplay.php?f=13)
-   -   What is your Bounce Rate? (https://vborg.vbsupport.ru/showthread.php?t=192394)

UncoderMom 05-22-2009 04:36 PM

11.15% New Visits
20.56% Overall
9.83% Forum index
5.79% .com page
# Direct Traffic 11,616.00 (75.65%)
#
Search Engines 2,447.00 (15.94%)
#
Referring Sites 1,289.00 (8.39%)
#
Other 3 (0.02%)

13,025 pages were viewed a total of 115,712 times

Stats from april 21st to march 21at. My sites traffic is down too. :(

--------------- Added [DATE]1243014083[/DATE] at [TIME]1243014083[/TIME] ---------------

Quote:

Originally Posted by imported_silkroad (Post 1815140)
No. it is not. I have been over this with many sites.

Most sites that receive traffic mostly from search engine referrals (the long tail traffic) will see very high bounce rates.

This is because most users who search for content using a search engine will click on the site from, say Google, and then they will "go back" if they do not find what they need and select another site (from the search engine). This is the nature of "long tail" traffic.

Almost all sites with high volumes of traffic from search engines referrals have high bounce rates.

So, when you say (incorrectly) "all high bounce rates are bad" what you are saying is "all long-tail search engine referral traffic is bad" because you cannot high search engine traffic without having a high bounce rate.

This is a fact. I wish it was not a fact, but it is.

Forums with 95% of their traffic, which are millions of page views a month, will have high bounce rates. Sites with mostly direct traffic and referral traffic other that search engines, will have a lower bounce rate.

Folks who make blanket statements that "high bounce rate is bad" normally come from sites that have low page views and little traffic from search engine referrals. The proof is in the numbers of high volume sites with mega long-tail search referrals.

--------------- Added [DATE]1242997055[/DATE] at [TIME]1242997055[/TIME] ---------------



It depends on the nature and volume of your traffic.

See my earlier posts.

--------------- Added [DATE]1242997142[/DATE] at [TIME]1242997142[/TIME] ---------------



Then you, more than likely, have site with relatively low page views per month from direct or non-search engine referral traffic


The trick is to KEEP THEM FROM HITTING THE BACK BUTTON. LOL

Keeping your data relevant and your content rich will reduce your bounce rate. Organic, referred or direct.

Spinball 05-24-2009 06:41 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Flawed poll. We have 60.5% bounce rate ;). We have massive penetration into Google and vBSEO installed. The trick is to keep people once they get here. No idea how to do that at the moment.

imported_silkroad 05-24-2009 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Justine (Post 1815161)
(large sites* - 5 million+ page views per month)

Sorry, but we don't need to grasp your message, because your message is incorrect.

If you have 5 million+ page views each month and most of your traffic is from search engine referrals, then please take a screen shot of the relevant data from Google analysts and post the images, showing your time period, page views, bounce rate and corresponding search engine referrals.

Sites with lots of direct traffic and referrals from other web pages get a much lower bounce rate than large sites with mega long-tail search engine referrals.

Frankly, Justine, I don't need a sidebar lecture on the topic (smile!), I want to see your facts :-) I do not think you have a site which gets massive search engine referrals and has a low bounce rate. All sites have the same issue. This is not theory, LOL, is this the nature of sites with massive search engine referrals.

Facts please!

PS: I have many sites with low bounce rates. They all have less traffic and a much lower percentage of search engine referrals. So, according to this poll, ROTFL, it is better to have a site with low traffic than a site with high traffic because the bounce rate is less? Not all sites are the same. You cannot make a blanket statement "low bounce is bad".... .that is why this poll is seriously flawed!

--------------- Added 24 May 2009 at 05:50 ---------------

Quote:

Originally Posted by UncoderMom (Post 1815298)
11.15% New Visits
20.56% Overall
9.83% Forum index
5.79% .com page
# Direct Traffic 11,616.00 (75.65%)
#
Search Engines 2,447.00 (15.94%)
#
Referring Sites 1,289.00 (8.39%)
#
Other 3 (0.02%)

13,025 pages were viewed a total of 115,712 times

Precisely my point, thank you!

This site (above) has a relatively low monthly page view where most traffic is direct traffic. Search engine referrals only account for 16% of the traffic. Naturally, this site will have a lower bounce rate that a site with much more traffic that comes mostly from long tail search engine referrals.

--------------- Added 24 May 2009 at 05:52 ---------------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spinball (Post 1816139)
Flawed poll. We have 60.5% bounce rate ;). We have massive penetration into Google and vBSEO installed. The trick is to keep people once they get here. No idea how to do that at the moment.

Agreed !!

Folks who do not have massive long tail traffic do not understand this concept. If you try to lower the bounce rate, the effect is that you will lower the amount of long-tail search engine referrals.

It is very difficult to lower bounce rate on these sites. I once made a change that improved bounce rate about 8 percent, and I was happy. Folks who don't have a great deal of long tail search referrals and have mostly direct or site referrals do not grok this concept.

Spinball 05-24-2009 11:56 AM

I have simplified our CMS (vBAdvanced) home page today. Will be interesting if that affects our bounce rate. I suspect it will make little difference.
I think if we need to reduce the bounce rate, we need something to entice them in on EVERY page. A welcome notice at the top for all new visitors which contains something to grab their attention.

imported_silkroad 05-24-2009 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spinball (Post 1816225)
I have simplified our CMS (vBAdvanced) home page today. Will be interesting if that affects our bounce rate. I suspect it will make little difference.
I think if we need to reduce the bounce rate, we need something to entice them in on EVERY page. A welcome notice at the top for all new visitors which contains something to grab their attention.

FYI, the following might work for you.

I was able to reduce bounce rate about 4 or 5 percentage points around a year ago just by moving Similar Threads to the top of the thread view (showthread) versus at the bottom. This is because users that come to visit via search referrals will bounce off if they don't see something they like, and will go back to their Google SERPs.

The problem is that, on a long-time referral to a post, Similar Threads does not work in showthread_showpost (or I could not get it to work). Adding a cloud tag at the top is not very effective, or at least is was not effective for us.

We never had any luck with vBadvanced because 95 percent of the traffic is from long-tail search referrals. Home page direct hits are such a low percentage, that the bounce rate of direct hits are insignificant.

If your have massive traffic from SERPs, then moving Similar Threads to the top of showthread might work for you as it did for us.

EagleNick 05-24-2009 01:41 PM

/// March 31 - April 30 ///

Zagis 05-24-2009 03:59 PM

Apr 23, 2009 - May 23, 2009

38,23% New Visits

32,45% Overall
9,44% Main index (portal)
9,80% Forum index

UncoderMom 05-25-2009 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by imported_silkroad (Post 1816191)
Sorry, but we don't need to grasp your message, because your message is incorrect.

If you have 5 million+ page views each month and most of your traffic is from search engine referrals, then please take a screen shot of the relevant data from Google analysts and post the images, showing your time period, page views, bounce rate and corresponding search engine referrals.

Sites with lots of direct traffic and referrals from other web pages get a much lower bounce rate than large sites with mega long-tail search engine referrals.

Frankly, Justine, I don't need a sidebar lecture on the topic (smile!), I want to see your facts :-) I do not think you have a site which gets massive search engine referrals and has a low bounce rate. All sites have the same issue. This is not theory, LOL, is this the nature of sites with massive search engine referrals.

Facts please!

PS: I have many sites with low bounce rates. They all have less traffic and a much lower percentage of search engine referrals. So, according to this poll, ROTFL, it is better to have a site with low traffic than a site with high traffic because the bounce rate is less? Not all sites are the same. You cannot make a blanket statement "low bounce is bad".... .that is why this poll is seriously flawed!

--------------- Added 24 May 2009 at 05:50 ---------------



Precisely my point, thank you!

This site (above) has a relatively low monthly page view where most traffic is direct traffic. Search engine referrals only account for 16% of the traffic. Naturally, this site will have a lower bounce rate that a site with much more traffic that comes mostly from long tail search engine referrals.

--------------- Added 24 May 2009 at 05:52 ---------------



Agreed !!

Folks who do not have massive long tail traffic do not understand this concept. If you try to lower the bounce rate, the effect is that you will lower the amount of long-tail search engine referrals.

It is very difficult to lower bounce rate on these sites. I once made a change that improved bounce rate about 8 percent, and I was happy. Folks who don't have a great deal of long tail search referrals and have mostly direct or site referrals do not grok this concept.

Well, This time last year... my bounce rates were almost the same except I had almost 500,000 page views a month and my search engine referrals were way higher. What then?

If I dig up a few months prior to that I had more then 750,000 page views on average. I wonder what my rates where then. hmmm


I know where all my traffic is going.. LOL Im guilty myself. FACEBOOK. :eek:

--------------- Added [DATE]1243264692[/DATE] at [TIME]1243264692[/TIME] ---------------

Okay skill road. I'd have to say your theory is a little flawed too.

Here is just an example....



* 32,998
Visits

* 453,249
Pageviews

* 13.74
Pages/Visit

* 8.56%
Bounce Rate

* 00:15:40
Avg. Time on Site

* 5.00%
% New Visits



*
Direct Traffic 21,355.00 (64.72%)
*
Referring Sites 6,179.00 (18.73%)
*
Search Engines 5,461.00 (16.55%)
*
Other 3 (0.01%)


Thats just one of my 30 day pulls. I can show you dozens more all with around a 10% average bounce rate. :eek:

Heres another from the same time year before this one.



* 43,164
Visits

* 793,287
Pageviews

* 18.38
Pages/Visit

* 7.87%
Bounce Rate

* 00:18:39
Avg. Time on Site

* 5.48%
% New Visits

# Direct Traffic 33,535.00 (77.69%)
#
Referring Sites 7,914.00 (18.33%)
#
Search Engines 1,715.00 (3.97%)

lasto 05-25-2009 03:24 PM

Ive had a few cheques Bounce during this credit crunch does that count :)

UncoderMom 05-25-2009 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lasto (Post 1816894)
Ive had a few cheques Bounce during this credit crunch does that count :)

HAHAHA Dont think so. LOL

EWGF 05-26-2009 03:31 PM

25 april - 25 may

20,25% Overall
14,52% Frontpage
10,80% Forum index

imported_silkroad 05-26-2009 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by UncoderMom (Post 1816850)
Well,
# Direct Traffic 33,535.00 (77.69%)
#
Referring Sites 7,914.00 (18.33%)
#
Search Engines 1,715.00 (3.97%)

You can easily see have have almost no search engine traffic compared to direct traffic and site referrals.

That is why your bounce rate is so low.

Site with mostly direct traffic or referring sites have much lower bounce rates. Your site is a perfect example of why bounce stats without traffic source stats are meaningless.

1,715 search referrals a month? Our site gets that much search referral traffic in less than one hour.

--------------- Added [DATE]1243356486[/DATE] at [TIME]1243356486[/TIME] ---------------

Quote:

Originally Posted by EWGF (Post 1817528)
25 april - 25 may

20,25% Overall
14,52% Frontpage
10,80% Forum index

These stats are completely meaningless.

If you are going to publish / post bounce rates, you must post your traffic stats, including traffic sources.

(See earlier posts).

UncoderMom 05-26-2009 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by imported_silkroad (Post 1817540)
You can easily see have have almost no search engine traffic compared to direct traffic and site referrals.

That is why your bounce rate is so low.

Site with mostly direct traffic or referring sites have much lower bounce rates. Your site is a perfect example of why bounce stats without traffic source stats are meaningless.

1,715 search referrals a month? Our site gets that much search referral traffic in less than one hour.

--------------- Added [DATE]1243356486[/DATE] at [TIME]1243356486[/TIME] ---------------



These stats are completely meaningless.

If you are going to publish / post bounce rates, you must post your traffic stats, including traffic sources.

(See earlier posts).

That stat you are referring to... Is one of my earliest ones because my site was only a few months old (explains low search engine referrals). I've given you several examples to show you differences in page views. Since you referred to my last one being off because of low page views./... Now its search engines? Which is it?

The truth is there is no ONE thing. Referrals are just as good as any search engine hit. The bottom line is and always will be with bounce rates is to get them to STAY and not click off. Make your landing pages HOT so they want to investigate instead of hitting the back button or the red X. PERIOD. It has always been my top priority. I think that reflects itself in my always low bounce rate. So believe what you want and I'll believe mine. If you have 5,000,000 page views and you have a 50 or 60 bounce rate. I can promise you, your doing something wrong. JMO

1Unreal 05-27-2009 06:46 PM

36.24% - Seems about average.

Alfa1 08-28-2009 03:22 PM

Are there any high traffic sites that have decreased their bounce rate a lot? I would love to know how others have improved bounce rate.

I have 10 million page views and an average bounce rate of 66%. 77% of visits come trough search engines.

TimberFloorAu 08-29-2009 05:54 PM

Our commercial site is:

20 % bounce rate on home page
Direct Traffic (51.43%)

Search Engines (37.14%)

Referring Sites (11.43%)

Average time on site 19 mins 07 seconds

imported_silkroad 08-29-2009 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by UncoderMom (Post 1816850)
Search Engines 1,715.00 (3.97%)

Normally pages with low search engine referrals have a low bounce rate.

You have a 4 percent rate of search engine referrals, so you will have a low bounce rate. I a site with 5M PVs from 95 percent search referrals will have a bounce rate nearly 70 percent.

That is why I said earlier, as have others, bounce rates without overall stats are meaningless, period.

ZiG 08-29-2009 08:16 PM

my bounce rate is at 50%, im having a very difficult time getting members to register and post on the forums. my community is very inactive and dead :(

matthewhotdude 09-01-2009 09:34 PM

67% :(

GTX2 12-08-2009 12:23 PM

Hi all !

I've red all comments above and would like your help.
I've bet on google since 2001 and took about 4 years to get all my content indexed and daily updated (using vbseo and sitemaps mostly).

I've got about 100k unique visitors per month, mostly from google (85%).
This if course means a high bounce rate (about 60%).

What would reduce most this bounce rate in my case?
I've moved similarthreads into the top of showthread to check results.
What more should i do to avoid this?

Thanks

Princeton 12-08-2009 12:46 PM

you need to pay attention to individual pages such as a portal or index page

forums will have a high bounce rate if you have a lot of traffic (indexed pages) from SEs

12-10-2009 10:44 AM

The lower the better as people are staying and looking at the content of your site instead of just moving along to the next site. There was a video of a SEO specialist talking about bounce rate as being the most representative analytic. He was also saying that a number to strive for should be 30 to 35%.

12-17-2009 03:11 AM

Depends a lot. I have few sites with bounce over 50 but thats not stopping the site from earning. On the other end, I have a website with bounce under 20.
Bounce is important but is not everything. For example if you have ads on the site, clicking on them immediately after visiting your blog will be counted as bounce, but may still bring you cash.

GTX2 01-09-2010 08:58 PM

I don't know if its a coincidence or not, but after moving similar threads to top, i stop having a daily bounce rate of 60% to start having a bounce rate of 2% .....
is it possible ??

google analytics says it...

fattony69 01-09-2010 09:11 PM

My bounce rate (according to Google Analytics) is 8.80%.

iamacyborg 01-12-2010 09:37 AM

Bounce rate on portal is 39%, forum 17%, wiki 9%, which seems quite good.

vietfancy 01-12-2010 11:23 AM

my bounce rate is pretty high: 60%.

valdet 10-05-2010 01:32 PM

bumping an old thread..

Can anyone share any practical tips about reducing the bounce rates.

My stats
  • Search Engines 210k visits (75.02%)
  • Direct Traffic 63k visits (19.68%)
  • Referring Sites 16k visits (5.30%)
  • Bounce rates 45%.
As you see from search engine referrals, my content is very relevant and I receive most of traffic from SE's but bounce rates for SE traffic only are even higher.

I've researched many articles/threads/blog posts and till now I had little success.


I appreciate any tips from other vBulletin developers.

Thanks.


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:57 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by vBS
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

X vBulletin 3.8.12 by vBS Debug Information
  • Page Generation 0.01369 seconds
  • Memory Usage 1,832KB
  • Queries Executed 10 (?)
More Information
Template Usage:
  • (1)ad_footer_end
  • (1)ad_footer_start
  • (1)ad_header_end
  • (1)ad_header_logo
  • (1)ad_navbar_below
  • (11)bbcode_quote_printable
  • (1)footer
  • (1)gobutton
  • (1)header
  • (1)headinclude
  • (6)option
  • (1)pagenav
  • (1)pagenav_curpage
  • (1)pagenav_pagelink
  • (1)post_thanks_navbar_search
  • (1)printthread
  • (28)printthreadbit
  • (1)spacer_close
  • (1)spacer_open 

Phrase Groups Available:
  • global
  • postbit
  • showthread
Included Files:
  • ./printthread.php
  • ./global.php
  • ./includes/init.php
  • ./includes/class_core.php
  • ./includes/config.php
  • ./includes/functions.php
  • ./includes/class_hook.php
  • ./includes/modsystem_functions.php
  • ./includes/class_bbcode_alt.php
  • ./includes/class_bbcode.php
  • ./includes/functions_bigthree.php 

Hooks Called:
  • init_startup
  • init_startup_session_setup_start
  • init_startup_session_setup_complete
  • cache_permissions
  • fetch_threadinfo_query
  • fetch_threadinfo
  • fetch_foruminfo
  • style_fetch
  • cache_templates
  • global_start
  • parse_templates
  • global_setup_complete
  • printthread_start
  • pagenav_page
  • pagenav_complete
  • bbcode_fetch_tags
  • bbcode_create
  • bbcode_parse_start
  • bbcode_parse_complete_precache
  • bbcode_parse_complete
  • printthread_post
  • printthread_complete