yes to first one
second it's just lame :rolleyes:

YES there should be. for the first one. but that would take a lot of time to moderate all the new threads.

oh yes... i agree with this... but you would need to make sure that you have a mod team on almost all day ...

What it's really importan it's to "force" hackers to have their hacks beta tested. Sometimes there are people that release hacks and admit they haven't tested it. I don't think that helps anyone.

We really appreciate all the work involved in hacking, but releasing something in the full releases forum that hasn't been tested it's bad for everyone.

We think that should be the main reason to start moderating the full releases forum :)

We also would like to show our respect to everyone that is here trying to help others. We are learning so much with you, guys! THANK YOU!

mhmm,

I am not happy with the current result of the poll.

It may be for example that my Hack ist not new, but before I wrote it myself, I searched for an existing, because I don't need to work for develop hacks myself (thanks @all, who wrote hacks I use). But it may be, that I error because of my great english. But perhaps - if someone develops a hack and wants to share it - it is in some points better than the not seen existing. The best would be, to merge the hacks to an optimal Result.

I am afraid that nobody understand or that I wrote something that I don't really - ehm - what's the vokabulary? - that I wrote something that is not consistent with that what my Brain would like to post . So I do it in german again:

Das bisherige Ergebnis der Umfrage gefällt mir persönlich nicht. Es mag sein, das z.B. mein Hack schon eimal da war, das habe ich dann aber beim Durchsuchen der Datenbank aufgrund meiner schlechten Englischkenntnisse übersehen. Leiber nutze ich selbstvertändlich getestete Hacks (danke an alle, die Ihre Ideen teilen). Falls es aber zu mehrfach geposteten Hacks kommen sollte wäre der Idealfall der, dass sich alle Beteiligten zusammen tuen, um das Optimum zu erreichen. Sofortiges Löschen eines Threads wäre dazu der falsche Weg.

Ich erlaube ausdrücklich jedem, der den deutschen Teil versteht und das Recht hat, diesen Beitrag zu editieren, den Müll den ich in Englisch verzapft habe zu berichtigen. Thanks.

I'm sorry Harvey but I really tried to understand your post and couldn't. :( Can anyone please translate it? Thanks.

I voted yes - I would like some moderation to cut-down on repeat hacks and the like.

I dont speak german but I believe he was basically trying to say that people sometimes create hacks because they didn't know it was already released. And this new version they created may sometimes be better than the original & they should be combined.

I'm german,

Reeve of shinra, has postet the right conclusion out of Harveys post. Harvey thought if someone post a better version of an existing hack, he and the Author of the original hack should perhaps work together. Just deleting of the new Hack is the fals way.


Ok now me:
I vote the second option, and it should depend on the days registred. Cause the amount of posts say nothing about the time how often someone reads the forum ;)

TBH I dont give a rats arse cos I was on a site the other day that had the entire hacks database on it so there are people here who obviously post them for those S.O.B's who dont have legit licences.

I think the best bet would be to make the entire site Registered members only.

But then I am a moaning old git.

HM