I had this idea that we wouldn't change what the vB style calls for, we would change the bootstrap terms to match, instead?

I WILL help finance this development. PM me please.

vB 4 is worth the development. I am sure it will pay off and probably be ready before the other one.

v4 has its mobile solution most people are happy with. The market is for v3.8B - B as in Bootstrap.

BUT - the v4 people simply don't know what they are missing so if you think you can get a v4.2B style ready first, what's the holdup? Money I gots. We can work on a v3.8B after.

Apologies for the confusion, I am not a coder type. I am just a person that thinks 4 would benefit hugely if someone was to commit some time to bringing it up to date with a responsive theme.

Both versions would, I definitely agree. Problem is most v4 owners I have seen out there are satisfied with the native mobile version.

I see. Thanks for that.
Is it possible to style the mobile version?

Yeah it's not really any different than any other style, in that regard. You can change the templates, and edit the stylevars all day.

Understand we're talking the native v4 mobile style here, not the mobile suite.

Why is the Mobile Suite not appropriate?

I have been looking for an in depth review of its features and faults for a couple of years now and it is becoming more important as the mobile users increase.

Attachment management seems to be the most persistens problem for the default mobile style in 4.2.

We also have many mobile device users who cannot get their heads around not being able to drag and drop images and perhaps other attachments into the edit window.

I didn't see anyone saying anything bad about it.