ok now what can we do without the the file :confused:

my thoughts exactly. here i searched for this crap, and finely found it, only to discover the main ingrediant is missing.

I think in these such cases, delete the whole thread, so people arent adding this and than finding out there is something missing.
(like i did)

yeah your right Tora Tora because we cant force the hack writter to write the instructions because I think sometimes it takes along time to do so

anyway I hope Scott with have the time to rewrite the instructions :( because it is a hack I would love to have

How do you think about *.js ?

it wasnt the instructions that caused the problems though. It was the file that was attached that did.
That is why i said, if the hack is presented, and a good portion of it is taken away, than axe the whole works, because hes not going to be able to post the java script again. :)

I see.

ztsky since you think it is ok to post the source code why don't you also put your *valid* vb license information in your profile.

Sorry, I wasn't aware of that rule. It makes since though. How stupid of me. I'm sure, however, many users would be happy with the improvement. Maybe you could include it in the next version.

Everyone, this "hack" was not in it's own right a hack but rather an improvement in the vbcode.js script. I unfortunately didn't know about posting vB source code so my attaching the script went against the rules. Therefore the script has been removed.

Scott

vB Dev Team,

Just a note. If you do decide to use the vbcode.js script could you please let me know. Either per email or PM or even a post, doesn't matter.

Scott

Why haven't the VB develpoers created an area on the webserver that is protected for valid license holders, like the members area, where files like this can be downloaded.

If it doesn't happen I can see customers moving to FREE open source alternatives as soon as they become as powerfull, and with hacks easily available.