Thats nice, but I won't run it or recomend it to anyone because of the back link. Or the copyright text in general, since this is completely a backend feature that a normal user will never see.

Not that i have a problem with copyrights, or authors wanting to benifit from their work.

Agreed. Why would I put your copyright on the frontend of my site when it's a backend feature?

Seems like you just want to cash in on big forums linking to you.

Guys, you discourage me!

I'm disappointed that simpler mods have got attention more than this one.

mate, he didnt mean to discourage you.
but how many copyrights we gonna put on forumhome ?
i have already three huh.

anyway Best ever hack for 3.7.0 :up:
:D

Sorry but I have to agree as well, having a compulsory copyright is a big turnoff for me to use this feature since it is back-end. I can understand a major front-end feature having one (like VBCredits points system for example, which I agreed to having in my footer) but not something like this. If most/all authors decided to copyright their work like this, then the footers of forums would be extremely unattractive since they would be essentially full of spam links.

SO I have much respect for authors who understand this issue and give users the option to display the copyright or not from the ACP, and chances are I would be more obliged to do so knowing that its not being forced.

Don't mean to discourage either, just hope that you reconsider this decision because it really is a great feature that shouldn't be burdened with something which makes it less attractive to install/use.

Otherwise well done on great work :)

Cheers :)

Can you add this same resource from the mod EZ Bouced Email Management?

Thanks a lot, This is a great starting point for a great addon. I do think that it needs the features Alfa1 suggested making it more like VBouncer. Also a catch-all address can be hard for a lot of users. I get hundreds, usually 200 - 300 a day of attempted spams to non existant addresses. These will all now not be refused and dump all the spams into the catch-all.

Yes, it's a better idea to use an MTA with VERP support (that sends only bounces with the VERP address pattern to a bounce mailbox), instead of a catch-all address.

That would require this add-on to actually use VERP (mailbox+memberid@ourdomain), rather than a proprietary pattern similar to VERP :(

I agree. My MTA calls it + addressing I think. If the format was changed slightly to mailbox+messageid@domain.com then people could use a compatible MTA or if they do not have one they could use a catch-all. I think the messageid idea is good to verify the bounce is not a fake bounce causing havoc to your members.

For me, I use Gmail. it handles the spam very well. Spam messages go to the spam box, and the bounce messages will be returned to me.

This is very easy and nice.