![]() |
opss...
sorry...I see now :o thanks |
Quote:
|
Working fine on my 3.5.3. Is there a way to put this above the quick reply box instead of under it?
Thanks Bob |
i lvoe your hacks! they always go in flawlessly!!!
|
Quote:
|
Noticed a minor issue with this hack a few days back. For all threads that include posts created since I installed this hack, the thread readers show up perfectly. But for older threads, those created before I installed this, the thread readers do not show properly, even if I visit those threads again. Right now I have it set to show readers in the past 60 days.
Here's an example older thread with a newer post: click here and here's a older one that does not have a newer post, and therefore won't show thread readers: click here The user account demo/demo can be used if you'd like to see how the thread readers will not show up. |
Your demo account does not appear to have permission to show this display at all.
FYI, all this does is pull the data from the vb thread marking datrabase, it has no control over what vb puts in that database. You should note that when you visit a thread older than the thread read limit (or any thread you have not previously read) you may have to re-visit it to see yourself in the read list as vb does not update the database until after the display is built. |
Sorry about that; demo accounts can now see the thread readers display at the bottom. I get your point; this hack is just reading what's in the db, not controlling what's in the db. I guess then this needs to be submitted to vb.com as buggy/unexpected behavior with their thread marking system.
No matter how many times I go back to an older thread, with a new user account that has never seen that thread, or a veteran user account even after that 60 day (or whatever you have it set to) window is over, it will not mark as read unless a new post is put into that thread. Couple things could be causing this, but the most likely now that I think about it is that the older threads/posts may have been created when my forum was using 3.0.X, and I have since upgraded (like many of us) to the 3.5.X series. |
Quote:
|
But if I create a brand new account, a user who has seen nothing at all on the board should have everything as unread, right? Turns out they don't, now that I understand what that day-limitting feature really means.
I just did this test, created a virgin account, and went to the board. All threads within the last 60 days are marked unread, but any thread older than that is already marked read for this user. So an old thread that doesn't have posts within the last 60 days can never be marked read again, whether or not a user has ever read that thread. Makes sense I guess, just disappoints me a bit as there are critical posts that I would want new users to read when they are on the board, and as they are older, I can not see who has read and who hasn't gone to those posts. Makes it seem as if they are not important ("nobody has read this thread in the past 60 days"), even if many people have. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:29 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by vBS
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
X vBulletin 3.8.12 by vBS Debug Information | |
---|---|
|
|
![]() |
|
Template Usage:
Phrase Groups Available:
|
Included Files:
Hooks Called:
|