does the paid version work with DC's url rewrite? If not I won't consider purchasing.

Then why did you put this in the vB3.5 Plugins forum? Also, if this is still in beta, it should be in the 3.5 beta forum.

The beta thing helps when we have a beta forum lol

If the free version works fine for you, fab. However, there is a natural progression with software, bug fixes, enhancements. For instance, the above version will probably stop due to running out of memory with forums over a certain size.

The pagination was almost right, but if there were to many deleted posts in a forum the forum/archive pagination would be a little different.

The new version also creates the files in a subdirectory rather than the root, a little safer to make a directory chmod 777 than the root.

It is also better setup for running of the scheduled task.

I have also personally added it to a number of clients sites, and so adapted it for more permentations of servers/software versions.

Probably fit better within the extensions forum, but that had only just been started when I submitted this.

With all due Respect- there is no way in a Blue Hell that I would even consider purchasing this. vbSEO was worth it- your addon isn't, I feel that if you release a Mod/addon here then you should release a final on here (unless it is a dead project) for the members and not leave it in beta, while you have a paid final version on your site.
This should be rule of the community.

With all due respect to T2DMan (whom I think highly of), I have to agree to some extent with the post above. Not so much about never purchasing, but about the way a lot of developers seem to be using vbulletin.org. I see a nasty trend of using it to develop/test something, then charging people who have been helping development once it is finished (or usable). If a post is created regarding a mod/hack at vbulletin.org by the author, it should be released free as the initial post states once it is finished. Otherwise I think it only fair that the post is removed entirely because then it just becomes a big advertisement posing as a free mod. If they then later want to do a major upgrade it (not just fix it), then I see no problem for them charging for new versions with new features. I don't like the way vbulletin.org is basically being used to advertise and lure users without offering them anything substantial (sort of like bait and switch). I just think things need to be more upfront.

Sincerely
-Vissa

Please be patient as the staff discusses the current situation. For the time being I've removed the link to the paid modification it is site/hack promotion.

So the one that is done well, is a paid hack and the one that isn't is free, right? Sounds to me like you used vb.org to work the bugs out so you could charge for the completed product. Not good.

Agreed. Essentially, we were used. Taken advantage of.