Other Idea:

- Is Important to Add a Yes/No Option to Allow (or Not) Users to Rate Their Own Posts. ;)

(Like on the Post Thank You Hack there's an Option to Allow or Not Users to Thank Themselves).

(In many cases Admins Won't Like Users to Rate/Rank Their Own Posts).

My Best Regards.

:)

inciarco, thanks for your feedback.

Since their vote is only one of many, it really makes no difference.


I'll look into adding this into next version


This was designed this way since hiding and highlighting posts is a user option (user = member)


This means you do not want to use the highlighting option.
Simply disable this feature and the post will have its original Alt1 and Alt2 colours.
Or, if you only want one side to have the Alt colour then why not insert that colour as the value?

there seems to be a major Bug. sometimes it works only on second click.
checking with firebug i can see that the first ajax request most always returns a 503

Very nice work here mate congrats i will try it. ;)

I am unable to duplicate this on Firefox running Firebug.
It always works on first click for me.
Can you provide more details please.

Thanks for this useful mod, nominated for MOTM!

Bugs Report:
1. When a user sets to auto collapse the lowest ranked posts, and then manually expands those posts, the reply & multi-quote buttons do not show up in both IE7 & FF3. Not sure if you intentionally left those buttons out, but those buttons may still be needed even for lowest ranked posts.

2. Clicking on the "# rank" link does not change it to "+upvote / -downvote" in IE7, but does work in FF3.

The Member Option (or Choosing to Apply that Option in All Cases) is Working Ok.

What is Not Working Fine is that If I Choose to Hide Very Low Ranked Posts, then the Hiding of Posts Only Work for Registered Members and Not For Unregistered Members.

If I'm a Unregistered Member then I can see Low Ranked Posts as well as the Other Posts No Matter the User's Will to Hide those Posts; the Hiding Rules are Only Applying to Registered Users and Not to Unregistered Ones.

It Should Apply to Registered Members as well as for Unregistered Members, (All Usergroups).

Make the Test:

- Choose to Hide Very Low Ranked Posts.
- Logged as Any User Verify that Any Post is Being Hide.
- Now as a Guest (Non Registered User), in Other Window, see that same Post... You'll see that It's Not Being Hidden for Guests. (That's the Bug - Hidden for Registered Users and Not for Unregistered ones). :confused:

I Hope You can Fix that Bug on your Next Update. ;)

Really Great Mod, Congratulations and Once Again Thank You For Sharing It. :up:

My Best Regards.

:)

Actually I noticed that when the Highlight Option is Enabled, and I try to select a Post to Moderate it in any way, then the Moderation Color don't Overwrite the Hoghlight Color, so I was planning to Enable Only the Highlight for the Title and leave the Content with the Original Color (Leaving Blank that particular Hightlight Option), so that when I Moderate the Content/Body of the Post has the Moderation Background Color, but as I explained when I leaved the Field Blank then a Neutral Color Appeared Damaging the Layout Background Color for the Post's Body/Content, that's why I suggested that when Leaving any of those 2 Fields Blank, then the Mod Leaves the Original Alt1 and/or Alt2 CSS Classes of those Table Cells, so that when Moderating those Posts the Post gets the Moderation Background Color when Clicking the Selection Box of that Post.

(Moderate the Post can mean Copy it, and is important to have the Visual Background Help to know which Posts are being Moderated at certain time).

I Hope this can be Applied, is a Simple Logic Sentence, <if> Field/Option is Not Blank then Apply Background Color </if>, and you see that if Field is Blank then No Style will be Applied to the Cell and the Forum Softeware will use the Defaul Alt1 or Alt2 CSS Style.

My Best Regards.

:)

i dont know what more details i could provide... it just doesnt work on the first click. and the ajax call returns a 503.

i dont' know what more details i can get out of this. suggestions please?

solved the problem. don't know why i didn't looked in the response directly.
my database user didnt have rights to use 'Lock Tables'. don't know why this doesn't make problmes in the rest of the board.