![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The staff got involved when you started attacking a member of staffs right to be on the team. From there it desecended into anarchy. This is a lot of little children who are throwing their toys out of the pram and just making themselves look like people who should not even be allowed near a computer. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
It is the architect's job to actually pile the bricks. Once again, however, this has nothing to do with the thread. Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
However I agree with what's been said; this thread has gone slightly off topic and my opinion has been stated already. |
In difference to everything else that has been said, I fully support a site owners right to pick whomever they please to represent and moderate their site. The people who pay the bills are not accountible to anyone here, IMO; so hire who you think will do the best job and I'll continue to contribute in a meaningful way.
You can't please everyone here, so pick a path and follow it. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
I would suggest that elections would open up a whole new can of worms, but thats just my opinion. I would say that you could make recommendations in private, but decisions on how a site is run should fall to the owners.
I would simply ask all of you who own sites consider if these types of policies would be acceptible to your forums. When I hire employees for my companies, I don't mind letting them get interviewed by their peers who will be working with them and getting feedback, but I make the final call on who gets hired and its not open for a vote. (Edit: I'm not knocking your idea, maybe just an issue of choice of words is all.) |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:17 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by vBS
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
X vBulletin 3.8.12 by vBS Debug Information | |
---|---|
|
|
![]() |
|
Template Usage:
Phrase Groups Available:
|
Included Files:
Hooks Called:
|