![]() |
Quote:
|
Seriously I was desperate after discovering that 3.5 doesn;t seem to have a portal system available (yet)
But even so, I like the concept of webtemplates MUCH better. THANKS |
Excellent mod and support Logician, Thanks
I missed this somehow when released. I just saw it listed in the H/O/M poll .. Hmm, I think I'm gonna run back over there and vote :D |
Hey guys can anyone post a link to pages they have made with this hack so i can see the power of it :D
Thanks |
Quote:
Here you go here |
Nice anyone else got any other examples then can show me :D
|
Quote:
Thanks for the quick reply and the fix. It worked as far as it was designed, but unfortunately my original request was flawed. I have 12 "Primary" usergroups. All members belong to at least one of these groups. I also have a couple hundred "Secondary" usergroups, most members belong to several of these each. Using the "Opt-out" paradigm you have here, it is impossible for me to allow access to secondary usergroups without also granting access to entire primary usergroups Example: If a user is a member of primary group 1 and secondary group A, If I try and block access to Primary Group 1 and allow access to Secondary Group A then the user will still not be allowed access because the way you have it written all users that are in primary group 1 are denied access. So I re-wrote your permissions function in your include file to switch the whole system to an "Opt-in" paradigm so that it better matches how vbulletin usually treats permissions. Can you take a look at this and let me know if it looks ok? I have tested it out and it seems to work fine. The only thing I needed to disable was the "Restrict individual users" function that you had, other wise granting access to a user with userid = 20 also grants access to the usergroup with usergroupid = 20. PHP Code:
|
Quote:
The section you commented out checks for paranthesis too so I wouldn't think it is allowing usergroupid 20 when you allowed userid 20. Quote:
I'm sure you'll agree that most of the admin's permission system would depend on "primary usergroups", not "secondary usergroups" so IMO how it is designed is make sense. :) |
I never meant to imply that it worked any way other than what you intended. It is an exceptionally well-written hack. For my own purposes though, I need it to work a different way, I just wanted to have you look over what I did above for a sanity check.
Thanks for clarifying the issue with the ()'s and the individually specified users, it makes much more sense that what I had assumed was going on. Quote:
Again, this is an incredible hack, many thanks for sharing! |
I hate to be a bother, but I'm in need of some help. I searched through the support document, and I've skimmed most of this thread. I'm sorry if this has been asked before.
BUT - I was wondering how could I use the two column theme, but have the content of the one column user-editable while keeping it "moron proof." Actually, if there was a way for them to enter the number (its for scrim record) in a text box, that would be grande (and then another text box to enter the teams they scrimmed). Also, is it possible to add another user editable field (editor I mean) that would show up another main table (for lack of a better word). If you need clarification, I'll post it. Thank you so much! |
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:53 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by vBS
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
X vBulletin 3.8.12 by vBS Debug Information | |
---|---|
|
|
![]() |
|
Template Usage:
Phrase Groups Available:
|
Included Files:
Hooks Called:
|