Does this work with Mozilla, or just IE?

Waaa, I need help with this. If anyone knows how to use the [ and ] characters in Javascript without them becoming essentially arrays, help me out! I've tried using a backslash before them, using their HTML equivilant, even using the escape(); function. Nothing works :(

I believe it does not work with Mozilla, that is why we have provided an option to turn it off for your members via usercp options.

Ahh sorry, I forgot that :)

btw how can i have the smilies at the cursor position, i think this was mentioned in this thread but it is really hard to read all again :)

I have yet to discover that, and don't think I ever will :(

As for the converting back to visual from BBCode, unless someone can help me figure out how to correctly use [ and ] in Javascript regular expressions, that will not work.

I am working on the buttons staying lit when you press them, but if you move the cursor it still stays lit; this is related to the problem with the smilies at cursor position; I don't know how to grab the position of the cursor in an iframe.

If anyone knows how to grab the position of a cursor in an iframe, then I can do at least one of the things above. At the moment, however, I'm at a standstill.

Yes, this is a very complicated piece of code, very different from the old textboxes that used to be there.

We would really appreciate it if you guys help out and bear with us if/when we find new bugs.:):bunny:

Hi. I got it installed; works great. I'm wondering if anyone can tell me how to make it so Raz's Spell Checker I installed will work again. SC now doesn't show at all and I really want to keep that too if I can. Thanks.

I haven't installed that one, but I think that you should just follow essentially the same directions, just do it on the *_wysiwyg templates.

In the button for the spell checker, make sure you add this in the button syntax:

onClick="Save();"

It's looking awfully good, but before I go to work, do you know if your updates have alleviated my problem (quoted below) with the former version?

Yep, that's fixed.:)