So you've changed the window size. You have not changed the quality. In fact, if the video is only available at resolutions under 853X510, wouldn't you actually decrease the quality by stretching it? Or does Youtube just ignore that and display it at the lower size anyway?

If you take a look here, you will see that the videos now play at 720p by default, and you can also choose what quality you like from the menu.

No prob.

It also added hd=1. youtube allows hd embedding. when you play the video it will also say "youtube hd" if it's done correctly. size was just an extra seeting along with the hd setting.

But that doesn't actually answer my question. Specifically, will video without HD versions be stretched, thus lowering their quality?

Did any1 get this to work in 4.0?? If so are there different intstructions from the original post?

Yes, there is a link that you need to look at referring to the 4.x fix in bbcode_video.php - I'm pretty sure it's linked in the head thread of each page of this mod.. .

Why do people not support their Mods?

OMG it's happening already. No, that is not the fix. The fix was given here - a mere dozen posts before the guy asked - apparently reading back one page was too much for him. And it's going to keep happening now. Page after page of new people coming in and not bothering to read back.

This mod isn't supported because the author no longer uses vb. But I sure wish he would mark this as reusable code and send this version to the graveyard!

Hey - That's the link in the post - I'm not about to read 68 pages.

Why can't we have the admins change that link so it stops the confusion instead of slamming the process peeps use. Or just graveyard it as you say. Certainly convinced me not to use it.

I tried once with a different mod that no longer worked. I was only told that it's every person's responsibility to read the entire thread before they install. Sounds good in theory if not in practice.

I agree there really needs to be a procedure to graveyard mods for reasons other than security concerns (though an unsupported non-working mod probably is a security risk in general). Maybe a vote of >x percent of users that have tried it, combined with a lack of communication from the author.